Literature DB >> 23096994

The biology of biologics: basic science and clinical concepts.

Yuri W Novitsky1, Michael J Rosen.   

Abstract

The repair of complex abdominal wall defects remains one of the most challenging procedures facing reconstructive surgeons. Through these collaborative efforts, defects that were once thought to be impossible to reconstruct can now be repaired, and patients who were left to a miserable quality of life are now offered hope. Among the most important advances in this field have been the adoption of component separation and many of its modifications, the development of new lightweight synthetic mesh, and the explosion of biologic mesh into the surgical armamentarium of the reconstructive surgeon. While biologic grafts are gaining in popularity, the molecular processes and host reactions to biologic grafts are not only unclear but often misunderstood and misrepresented. As a result, comprehensive analysis of basic science concepts presented in this review should help a practicing surgeon with understanding what biologics actually do and what we can expect biologic meshes to accomplish. This article focuses on summarizing the current basic science evidence and the clinical outcomes of utilization of these grafts published in the peer-reviewed literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23096994     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31825f395b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  26 in total

Review 1.  Surgical mesh for ventral incisional hernia repairs: Understanding mesh design.

Authors:  Ali Rastegarpour; Michael Cheung; Madhurima Vardhan; Mohamed M Ibrahim; Charles E Butler; Howard Levinson
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 0.947

2.  The Adjunctive Use of Biologically Engineered Products in Plastic Surgery Practice.

Authors:  R Michael Johnson; Lucas M Harrison; Spencer R Anderson
Journal:  J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec       Date:  2018-01-31

3.  The battle between biological and synthetic meshes in ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  A Montgomery
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-01-13       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 4.  Biologic versus Synthetic Mesh Reinforcement: What are the Pros and Cons?

Authors:  James F FitzGerald; Anjali S Kumar
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-12

5.  Efficacy of porcine acellular dermal matrix in the management of lower eyelid retraction: case series and review of the literature.

Authors:  Lindsay A McGrath; Thomas G Hardy; Alan A McNab
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  Biomaterials: so many choices, so little time. What are the differences?

Authors:  John D Hunter; Jamie A Cannon
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-12

7.  Cell-coating affects tissue integration of synthetic and biologic meshes: comparative analysis of the onlay and underlay mesh positioning in rats.

Authors:  Arnab Majumder; Yue Gao; Emanuel E Sadava; James M Anderson; Yuri W Novitsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  First human use of hybrid synthetic/biologic mesh in ventral hernia repair: a multicenter trial.

Authors:  James G Bittner; Kevin El-Hayek; Andrew T Strong; Melissa Phillips LaPinska; Jin S Yoo; Eric M Pauli; Matthew Kroh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The effects of Losartan on abdominal wall fascial healing.

Authors:  C N Criss; Y Gao; G De Silva; J Yang; J M Anderson; Y W Novitsky; H Soltanian; M J Rosen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Risk factors, outcomes, and complications associated with combined ventral hernia and enterocutaneous fistula single-staged abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  K M Klifto; S Othman; C A Messa; W Piwnica-Worms; J P Fischer; S J Kovach
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.