Literature DB >> 26438439

Updated Evidence of Acellular Dermal Matrix Use for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis.

Kyeong-Tae Lee1, Goo-Hyun Mun2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has increased exponentially, debates regarding its safety are still ongoing. There have been several meta-analyses; however, potential learning curve effects of using ADM might affect their outcomes. The present meta-analysis reappraised the potential benefits and risks of ADM on the outcome of implant-based breast reconstruction using recent publications.
METHODS: Electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies comparing the outcome of ADM use with traditional submuscular technique, which were published from 2011 to 2014. The relative risks of postoperative complications and mean difference of expander dynamics between the two groups were computed.
RESULTS: A total of 23 studies representing 6199 cases were analyzed. There was one randomized controlled study and three prospective cohort studies. The use of ADM significantly elevated the risks of infection, seroma, and mastectomy flap necrosis, but did not affect the risks of implant loss, unplanned reoperation, and total complications. The risks of capsular contracture and implant malposition were significantly reduced by the application of ADM. The ADM allows for significantly greater intraoperative expansion and reduced frequency of injection to complete expansion.
CONCLUSIONS: According to this meta-analysis, the increasing risks for serious complication and overall morbidity related to ADM use might not be remarkable, while its benefits for preventing late complications and improving expander dynamics might be appreciable. Although future well-controlled studies would be required, the implant-based breast reconstruction using ADM may be reliable and advantageous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26438439     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4873-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  37 in total

1.  Surveillance and Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Breast Oncologic Surgery with Immediate Reconstruction.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Katelin B Nickel; Ida K Fox
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-11

2.  Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits.

Authors:  Michael Sorkin; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Jeffrey H Kozlow; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Evidence for the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Paula R Gravina; Rowland W Pettit; Matthew J Davis; Sebastian J Winocour; Jesse C Selber
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 4.  Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jordan Kaplan; Ryan D Wagner; Tara L Braun; Carrie Chu; Sebastian J Winocour
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Efficacy of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Capsular Contracture of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Arm Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Liu; Jinfei Hou; Zhipeng Li; Bin Wang; Jiaming Sun
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.326

6.  Hyperbaric oxygen treatment for mastectomy flap ischaemia: A case series of 50 breasts.

Authors:  Nicole E Spruijt; Lisette T Hoekstra; Johan Wilmink; Maarten M Hoogbergen
Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 0.887

7.  The relationship of human acellular dermal matrix thickness on complication rate and patient-reported outcomes in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Seung Eun Hong; Jung-Hoon Kim
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

8.  Comparison of one-stage direct-to-implant with acellular dermal matrix and two-stage immediate implant-based breast reconstruction-a cohort study.

Authors:  Mette Eline Brunbjerg; Thomas Bo Jensen; Jens Overgaard; Peer Christiansen; Tine Engberg Damsgaard
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

9.  Comparisons of Therapeutic and Aesthetic Effects of One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with and without Biological Matrix.

Authors:  Peng Gao; Zhongzhao Wang; Xiangyi Kong; Xiangyu Wang; Yi Fang; Jing Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 3.989

10.  Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery Correlation Between Practice and Evidence.

Authors:  Peter Mankowski; Abhiram Cherukupalli; Karen Slater; Nick Carr
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 0.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.