Literature DB >> 27877538

Substrate stiffness affects skeletal myoblast differentiation in vitro.

Sara Romanazzo1, Giancarlo Forte2, Mitsuhiro Ebara2, Koichiro Uto2, Stefania Pagliari2, Takao Aoyagi2, Enrico Traversa3, Akiyoshi Taniguchi4.   

Abstract

To maximize the therapeutic efficacy of cardiac muscle constructs produced by stem cells and tissue engineering protocols, suitable scaffolds should be designed to recapitulate all the characteristics of native muscle and mimic the microenvironment encountered by cells in vivo. Moreover, so not to interfere with cardiac contractility, the scaffold should be deformable enough to withstand muscle contraction. Recently, it was suggested that the mechanical properties of scaffolds can interfere with stem/progenitor cell functions, and thus careful consideration is required when choosing polymers for targeted applications. In this study, cross-linked poly-ε-caprolactone membranes having similar chemical composition and controlled stiffness in a supra-physiological range were challenged with two sources of myoblasts to evaluate the suitability of substrates with different stiffness for cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation. Furthermore, muscle-specific and non-related feeder layers were prepared on stiff surfaces to reveal the contribution of biological and mechanical cues to skeletal muscle progenitor differentiation. We demonstrated that substrate stiffness does affect myogenic differentiation, meaning that softer substrates can promote differentiation and that a muscle-specific feeder layer can improve the degree of maturation in skeletal muscle stem cells.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac tissue engineering; mechanobiology; myoblasts; substrate stiffness

Year:  2012        PMID: 27877538      PMCID: PMC5099771          DOI: 10.1088/1468-6996/13/6/064211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater        ISSN: 1468-6996            Impact factor:   8.090


  49 in total

1.  Isolation and characterization of human fetal myoblasts.

Authors:  Ariya D Lapan; Emanuela Gussoni
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

Review 2.  Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate.

Authors:  Dennis E Discher; Paul Janmey; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Criticality of the biological and physical stimuli array inducing resident cardiac stem cell determination.

Authors:  Giancarlo Forte; Felicia Carotenuto; Francesca Pagliari; Stefania Pagliari; Paolo Cossa; Roberta Fiaccavento; Arti Ahluwalia; Giovanni Vozzi; Bruna Vinci; Annalucia Serafino; Antonio Rinaldi; Enrico Traversa; Luciana Carosella; Marilena Minieri; Paolo Di Nardo
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 4.  Challenges in cardiac tissue engineering.

Authors:  Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic; Nina Tandon; Amandine Godier; Robert Maidhof; Anna Marsano; Timothy P Martens; Milica Radisic
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.389

5.  Myogenic differentiation in permanent clonal mouse myoblast cell lines: regulation by macromolecular growth factors in the culture medium.

Authors:  T A Linkhart; C H Clegg; S D Hauschika
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  Gene profiling studies in skeletal muscle by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  Shephali Bhatnagar; Siva K Panguluri; Ashok Kumar
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

7.  Morphofunctional integration between skeletal myoblasts and adult cardiomyocytes in coculture is favored by direct cell-cell contacts and relaxin treatment.

Authors:  Lucia Formigli; Fabio Francini; Alessia Tani; Roberta Squecco; Daniele Nosi; Lucia Polidori; Silvia Nistri; Laura Chiappini; Valentina Cesati; Alessandra Pacini; Avio M Perna; Giovanni E Orlandini; Sandra Zecchi Orlandini; Daniele Bani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 4.249

8.  Influence of substrate stiffness on the phenotype of heart cells.

Authors:  Bashir Bhana; Rohin K Iyer; Wen Li Kelly Chen; Ruogang Zhao; Krista L Sider; Morakot Likhitpanichkul; Craig A Simmons; Milica Radisic
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Characterization of human myoblast cultures for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jens Stern-Straeter; Gregor Bran; Frank Riedel; Alexander Sauter; Karl Hörmann; Ulrich Reinhart Goessler
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.101

10.  Simple and high yielding method for preparing tissue specific extracellular matrix coatings for cell culture.

Authors:  Jessica A DeQuach; Valeria Mezzano; Amar Miglani; Stephan Lange; Gordon M Keller; Farah Sheikh; Karen L Christman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Microfluidic devices for disease modeling in muscle tissue.

Authors:  Mollie M Smoak; Hannah A Pearce; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Tuning Myogenesis by Controlling Gelatin Hydrogel Properties through Hydrogen Peroxide-Mediated Cross-Linking and Degradation.

Authors:  Wildan Mubarok; Kelum Chamara Manoj Lakmal Elvitigala; Shinji Sakai
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-06-17

3.  Changes in Elastic Moduli of Fibrin Hydrogels Within the Myogenic Range Alter Behavior of Murine C2C12 and Human C25 Myoblasts Differently.

Authors:  Janine Tomasch; Babette Maleiner; Philipp Heher; Manuel Rufin; Orestis G Andriotis; Philipp J Thurner; Heinz Redl; Christiane Fuchs; Andreas H Teuschl-Woller
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-20

4.  Extracellular matrix remodelling induced by alternating electrical and mechanical stimulations increases the contraction of engineered skeletal muscle tissues.

Authors:  Hyeonyu Kim; Min-Cheol Kim; H Harry Asada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Characterization of Gelatin Hydrogels Cross-Linked with Microbial Transglutaminase as Engineered Skeletal Muscle Substrates.

Authors:  Divya Gupta; Jeffrey W Santoso; Megan L McCain
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-06

6.  Bioinspired electrospun dECM scaffolds guide cell growth and control the formation of myotubes.

Authors:  Mollie M Smoak; Katie J Hogan; K Jane Grande-Allen; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Aligned Poly(ε-caprolactone) Nanofibers Superimposed on Decellularized Human Amniotic Membrane Promoted Myogenic Differentiation of Adipose Derived Stem Cells.

Authors:  Azam Hadipour; Vahid Bayati; Mohammad Rashno; Mahmoud Orazizadeh
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.479

8.  Nanocomposite Conductive Bioinks Based on Low-Concentration GelMA and MXene Nanosheets/Gold Nanoparticles Providing Enhanced Printability of Functional Skeletal Muscle Tissues.

Authors:  Selwa Boularaoui; Aya Shanti; Michele Lanotte; Shaohong Luo; Sarah Bawazir; Sungmun Lee; Nicolas Christoforou; Kamran A Khan; Cesare Stefanini
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2021-11-22

9.  New volumetric CNT-doped gelatin-cellulose scaffolds for skeletal muscle tissue engineering.

Authors:  Ferran Velasco-Mallorquí; Juan M Fernández-Costa; Luisa Neves; Javier Ramón-Azcón
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2020-05-29

10.  TGF-β Regulates Collagen Type I Expression in Myoblasts and Myotubes via Transient Ctgf and Fgf-2 Expression.

Authors:  Michèle M G Hillege; Ricardo A Galli Caro; Carla Offringa; Gerard M J de Wit; Richard T Jaspers; Willem M H Hoogaars
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 6.600

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.