Azam Hadipour1,2, Vahid Bayati1,2, Mohammad Rashno1,3, Mahmoud Orazizadeh1,4. 1. Cellular and Molecular Research Center (CMRC), Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. 2. Department of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. 3. Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. 4. Department of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. Email: orazizadehm@gmail.com.
Skeletal muscle, is a crucial part of movement, posture,
temperature management, and a variety of metabolic
processes (1). Skeletal muscle injuries commonly
result from various types of traumatic incidents such
as excessive exercise, contusions, lacerations, surgical
incisions (2). After a mild injury, a group of specific stem
cells of skeletal muscle known as satellite cells activates,
proliferates, and also fuses to repair current cells or
produce new ones to back the typical myofibers (3).In other hand, evidence is presented to show that
more than 20% loss of muscles may be equal to the loss
regenerative process. In this case, a mass of scar tissue
forms instead of degenerated muscle tissue, resulting in a
loss of function (4) that is called volumetric muscle loss
(VML) injury (5). VML injury characteristics are listed
as loss of muscle fibers, gross fibrosis, persistent strength
deficits, limb dysfunction, and chronic disability (6).
Furthermore, tissue availability and donor site morbidity
are critical factors that affect the clinical management of
VML (7, 8).Regenerative medicine strategies of skeletal muscle
repair potentially, offer solutions to the many limitations
of current therapies (9). Tissue engineering approaches to
regenerate damaged tissues also involve a combination of
desirable stem cells, biomaterial scaffolds, and signaling
factors such as growth factors (10).Adipose derived stem cells (ADSCs) are thought to be
an ideal candidate for application in regenerative therapies.
Compared to other mesenchymal stem cells, such as bone
marrow stem cells, ADSCs may be extracted simply
and repeatedly, by a minimally invasive procedure and
consequently, low morbidity (11). ADSCs possess potential
for differentiation into a variety of cell types including
adipocytes, osteoblasts, chondrocytes and myocytes (12).Scaffolds can be used as a model for directing tissue
reformation, and preparing a matrix for optimal cell
microenvironment. In addition, scaffolds act as a
delivery vehicle for bioactive substances, and local
niches for in situ tissue regeneration (13). Scaffolds
may be fabricated of either natural [such as extracellular
matrix (ECM)] or synthetic materials [such as poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL)].Actually, in order to obtaining desirable tissueengineered ECM scaffold, some studies have focused on
the standard characteristics, including histocompatibility,
bioactivity, porosity, degradability, non-toxicity and
mechanical properties (14).Human amniotic membrane (HAM), a natural scaffold,
has been utilized in some recent investigations, such
as ocular surface reconstruction (15) and wound
healing management (16). Different characters such
as biology, structure and mechanical properties, make
HAM as a high potential scaffold biomaterial (17).
Histologically, HAM is composed of simple cuboidal
epithelial cells, laid on the dense basement membrane.
Underlying layer occupied by many collagen fibers
with different orientations, and stem cells. Its basement
membrane composed of collagen types I, III and IV,
laminin and fibronectin (18). It is also inexpensive and
widely available (19), and decellularization reduces
not only HAM’s immunogenicity, but also exposes its
ECM proteins, making it an ideal candidate for tissue
engineering (20).It has been previously reported that electrospun
polymer nanofibers have been demonstrated to present
topographical cues in supporting stem cell expansion,
migration, and differentiation. For example, an
electrospun PCL, the most important synthetic polymers,
is used for developing nanofibrous scaffold. Because of
its cytocompatibility, biodegradability, and mechanical
resistance for PCL and PCL-based materials, it has
received great attention in tissue engineering studies
(21). On the other hand, PCL is a biopolymer with high
hydrophobicity, which is crucial to create an engineered
scaffold that could be mechanically competent and
topographically favorable for cell attachment and
alignment for the regeneration and remodeling processes
of highly organized tissue, like the skeletal muscles (21-
23). HAM is not able to direct stem cells in a desirable
orientation and alignment during the formation of tissue
substitutes. On the other hand, a composite scaffold
of both HAM and oriented nanofibers can establish
a scaffold with appropriate mechanical strength and
alignment. Mechanical stimulation of the 3D constructs
that were fabricated of nanofibers composites, can further
be in favor of enhanced growth, increased contraction
forces, and proper alignment of the muscle fibers (24).Taken together, it is quite important to investigate
novel therapeutic strategies to target skeletal muscle
regeneration. Therefore, we developed a bi-layered biocomposite by using electrospun fibers of PCL in random
and aligned pattern upon a freeze-dried HAM. And also,
we evaluated its probable biological properties and role in
the ADSCs differentiation into skeletal myoblasts.
Materials and Methods
All experiments were conducted in accordance with the
institutional guidelines by the Ethical Committee of The
Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (IR.
AJUMS.REC.1396.231).
Human amniotic membrane collection and
decellularization
This work is a basic research study that undertook to
improve the knowledge related to tissue engineering of
skeletal muscle procedure. After taking the consent from
the mothers, HAM was obtained following caesarean
section deliveries. Human immunodeficiency virus type
II, syphilis, gonorrhea, toxoplasmosis, human hepatitis
virus types B and C, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) were all
tested serologically in all tissues. HAMs were separated
from the chorion and washed several times with sterile
phosphate buffer saline (PBS, 7640658, Invitrogen,
USA) containing 0.1% antibiotic-antimycotic (4127401,
Gibco, USA), until all blood and blood clots were washed
away. Then, they were cut into smaller pieces and frozen
at -80°C. Three freeze-thaw cycles were performed on
these components, ranging from 37°C to -80°C. Then,
the tissues were incubated in a trypsin-EDTA solution
overnight at 4°C. In the next step, the tissues were washed
by complete DMEM (7130456, Gibco, USA). By using a
cell scraper, epithelial cells of HAM were gently removed
at 4°C to minimize degradation of scaffold proteins. After
three washes with PBS, the decellularized HAM (DHAM)
was stored at -80°C for up to 3 months.
Characterization of decellularized human amniotic
membrane
Intact and DHAM tissues were evaluated using
Olympus BX51 light microscope. Specimens were fixed
using 10% (w/v) neutral-buffered formalin, dehydrated
and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections were cut using
a microtome at 5 µm and stained using hematoxylin and
eosin (H&E). All sections were histologically evaluated
by using an Olympus BX51 light microscope.
Fabrication of composite PCL-DHAM scaffolds
PCL (Sigma, USA) polymer was dissolved in 12%
(w/v) concentration of a 1:1 solvent mixture of
dichloromethane (75-09-2, DCM, Sigma-Aldrich, USA)
and dimethyl formamide (68-12-2, DMF, Sigma-Aldrich,
USA), then loaded into a 10 ml syringe equipped with a
-gauge blunt needle and spun onto DHAMs attached on a
mandrel collector at 22 kV of applied voltage, 1 ml/hour
of polymer flow rate, 16 cm of deposition distance, and
~2500 RPM of rotating speed for aligned nanofibers and
~1000 RPM for random nanofibers (17). The electrospun
fibers were fabricated on DHAM via electrospinning to
produce a composite of PCL-DHAM scaffold. Finally,
three scaffolds were developed and used in the subsequent
experiments as DHAM, randomized fibers on DHAM
(Random) and aligned fibers on DHAM (Aligned).
In vitro degradation
Electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds were placed in 24- well plate containing 1 ml of a
phosphate buffer solution (PBS, pH=7.4) in each well and were incubated at 37°C and 5%
CO2 for 14 days. After degradation period, the samples were washed and
subsequently dried in a vacuum oven, at room temperature for 24 hours. Scanning electron
microscope (SEM) of scaffolds was performed to assess the changes in nanofibers morphology
during this period.
Mechanical testing
The mechanical properties of three samples consist of
the rehydrated DHAM, random and aligned were survived
at a cross head rate of 10 mm/minutes using a universal
testing machine (STM-20, Iran). Testing machine was
equipped by the specimen holders specifically designed
for the nanofibrous samples. All of the samples were
cut into 50 mm×10 mm rectangular-shape strips, and
thickness of each sample was sharply measured via a
micrometer before the test (n=3). Stress-strain, ultimate
tensile strength, and Young’s modulus was evaluated by
examining 3 specimens from each type of sample.
Isolation and culture of adipose derived stem cells
ADSCs were isolated from adult Wistar rats (male, 8 weeks, weight 150-200 g). Anesthesia
was intraperitoneally performed by injecting ketamine (85 mg/ kg, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and
xylazine (15 mg/kg, Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Then, the gonadal fat pad was carefully
dissected, harvested and placed in the ice cold PBS. After rinsing with PBS in a 50 ml
conical tube, adipose tissue was digested in collagenase type I (0.1%, C9891, ICN,
Biomedicals, USA), then dissolved in DMEM for 45 minutes at 37°C with shaking. The
resultant suspension was passed through a 70-μm filter to remove undissociated tissue,
neutralized by DMEM containing 10% FBS (102-70-106, Gibco, Heat-inactivated, NY, USA) and
centrifuged at 2000 RPM for 5 minutes. The total samples were re-centrifuged at 2000 RPM
for 5 minutes. Then, the supernatant was discarded and the pellet called stromal vascular
fraction (SVF). In the next step, SVF pellets were suspended in DMEM containing 10% FBS,
and penicillin/streptomycin (26332-014, Sigma, NY, USA) and incubated at 37°C, 5%
CO2 overnight. After 24 hours, the medium was completely replaced with a
fresh one. This medium replacement performed one every 72 hours. Reaching 80% confluence,
cells were detached by 0.25% trypsin (27250-018, Sigma, NY, USA) containing 0.1% EDTA
(27239-08, Sigma, NY, USA) and subcultivated at the density of 4000 cells/cm2 .
After 4 passages, the potency of isolated ADSCs was assessed using differentiation
potential assay and flowcytometry and used in subsequent experiments.
Culturing of ADSCs on the PCL-DHAM scaffolds
Scaffolds (7×5 mm, n=3 for each time point) were previously disinfected by 70% v/v
alcohol/water solution (70:30) for one hour and rinsed with DMEM containing 10% FBS. ADSCs
were cultured on the PCL-DHAM scaffolds with various surface topographies (such as aligned
and random) at the density of 4000 cells/cm2 and allowed to reach 80%
confluence. Then induction of myogenic differentiation was applied.
Induction of myogenic differentiation
To induce myogenic differentiation, ADSCs were
cultured in DMEM containing 10 % FBS and 3µM
5-azacytidine for 24 hours. On the second day, the culture
medium was changed by DMEM supplemented with 5%
horse serum (H55000, Gibco, USA) for 7 days. On day
7, the culture medium was discarded and the cells on
scaffolds were fixed with glutaraldehyde (Sigma, USA)
for 2 hours and examined by SEM, immunofluorescence
and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or assessing myogenic differentiation.
MTT Assay
Cell viability was determined by an MTT assay. To determine the effects of the PCL-DHAM
on the viability of ADSCs, the cells were seeded on the PCL-DHAM at 2×104
cells/cm2 , and incubated in a cell culture incubator for 24 hours (37°C, 5%
CO2 ). After the predetermined time points, the cells were washed twice in
PBS (pH=7.4) and treated with tetrazolium salt (MTT, 3-(4, 5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-
2,5-diphenyl-2H tetrazolium bromide) for 2 hours at 37°C. Then, they were washed again in
PBS and treated with DMSO (Sigma, USA) or 15 minutes, in the dark at room temperature
(25°C). Optical density (OD) values of living cells were measured by ELISA (enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay) assay, and recorded at a wavelength of 570 nm. MTT results for each
sample were compared to controls (cells cultured on plain plastic surfaces of flasks).
Myogenic differentiation assessment
To assess myogenic differentiation (myotube formation),
samples were fixed by 2.5% glutaraldehyde buffer
(glutaraldehyde plus 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer,
pH=7.2) for 2 hours, rinsed with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer
three times, dehydrated through a series of ethyl alcohol
solutions (20-100 % v/v ethyl alcohol in distilled water)
and then air dried. Specimens were gold-sputtered
(Edwards SB, operating at 0.2 mbar, 1 kV, 20 mA for
1 minute) and examined by SEM (LEO, Zeiss 1455) at
an accelerating voltage of 7.5 kV and working distance
7-9 mm.
Immunofluorescence staining
Myogenically differentiated ADSCs grown on PCL-DHAM scaffolds were rinsed with PBS, fixed by 4%
paraformaldehyde (Sigma, USA) for 20 minutes at
4˚C, permeabilized with 0.5%Triton X100 (Merck, NJ,
USA) for 10 minutes and blocked by 3% BSA (Sigma,
USA) to prevents non-specific binding for 1 hour at
room temperature. The cells were incubated with mouse
monoclonal anti-myosin (fast skeletal, 1:100, Sigma,
USA) at 4˚C overnight. Next day, cells were rinsed with
PBS three times and incubated with goat anti-mouse FITC conjugated secondary antibody (1:100, Sigma, USA) for
2 hours at room temperature in the dark. Then, DAPI
(1:15000, Sigma, USA) as a nuclear marker was added to
the cells for 40 minutes at room temperature. Finally, the
samples (i.e. cells on scaffolds) were examined 1under
fluorescence microscope (Olympus IX71, Japan). The
corresponding negative controls were set by omitting the
primary antibodies in the standard procedure. Therefore,
any observed fluorescence resulted from the nonspecific
binding of secondary antibody to the sample (17).
Real-time polymerase chain reaction
On day 7, total RNA was extracted from the cells of
PCL-DHAM and DHAM by using RNeasy plus mini kit
(Qiagen, MD, USA) and, subjected to DNase (Qiagen, MD,
USA), quantified and then stored in the RNase free water
at -80°C. Using Quanti Nova® Reverse Transcription kit
(Qiagen, MD, USA) cDNA was synthesized according
to manufacturer’s instruction. SYBER green-based realtime PCR primers (TaKaRa, Japan) were designed to span
exon/intron junctions using the Primer Express Software
(version 3). The sequences of primers were as follows:Mhc -F: 5ˊ-ggctggctggacaagaaca-3ˊR: 5ˊ-ccaccactacttgcctctgc-3ˊMyogenin-F: 5ˊ-ctgaccctacagacgcccac-3ˊR: 5ˊ-tgtccacgatggacgtaagg-3ˊTwo step real-time PCR was performed using SYBR® Premix Ex-TaqTM (TaKaRa,
Japan) according to its protocol using Light Cycler®. The comparative threshold cycle (CT)
was the method of choice for the analysis of the obtained data, in which the formula
2-∆∆CT was used as ∆CT=CT of target gene-CT of housekeeping gene
(normalization) and ∆∆CT=∆CT of sample-∆CT ∆CT of calibrator (control group). The
β-actin was applied as a housekeeping gene.
Statistical analysis
All quantitative data were expressed as mean ± SD.
One-way ANOVA was performed to assess statistically
significant differences in the results of different
experimental groups (version 16, SPSS Inc., USA).
P<0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Results
Histological characterization of HAM and DHAM
Using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining,
intact HAM and decellularized-HAM (DHAM) were
histologically evaluated. Histological assessments
confirmed that the decellularization procedure was
successfully carried out and no cells were detected in
different parts of treated HAM (Fig.1A, B).
Fig.1
Characterization of HAM and DHAM. A. H&E stained intact HAM. B.
H&E stained DHAM (scale bar: 200 µm). Mechanical characterization of rehydrated
DHAM, aligned and random patterns. Aˊ. Stress-strain curve. Bˊ.
Young’s modulus and UTS. Both significantly different in comparison with PCL
nanofibers (P<0.05, n=3). DHAM; Decellularized human amniotic membrane and UTS;
Ultimate tensile strength.
Mechanical properties of amniotic bio-composites
The tensile strength of rehydrated DHAM, random and
aligned were evaluated by a mechanical testing device. The
tensile testing curves of these three samples (rehydrated
DHAM, random and aligned) are shown in Figure 1Aˊ and
Bˊ. All of the samples illustrated a typical linear stress-strain behavior in the first stage (< 10% initial strain). It
seems that the specimens present an elastic region and at
the yield stress changed from an elastic region to a plastic
region. Young’s modulus of the rehydrated aligned fibers
increased significantly in comparison with rehydrated
random scaffold (P<0.01). The ultimate tensile strength
(UTS) and Young’s module of rehydrated DHAM were
0.16 ± 0.035 and 0.976 ± 0.028 respectively. Moreover,
the results illustrated the higher UTS and Young’s
modulus for rehydrated aligned (0.41 ± 0.107 and 2.48
± 0.216) in comparison with rehydrated random (0.26 ±
0.116 and 1.34 ± 0.207). The Young’s modulus showed
similar trend for the tensile strength in both of aligned and
random samples compared to rehydrated DHAM sample.
Tensile Young’s modulus and UTS of rehydrated random
and aligned, were significantly enhanced in comparison
with rehydrated DHAM alone (Fig.1Bˊ).Characterization of HAM and DHAM. A. H&E stained intact HAM. B.
H&E stained DHAM (scale bar: 200 µm). Mechanical characterization of rehydrated
DHAM, aligned and random patterns. Aˊ. Stress-strain curve. Bˊ.
Young’s modulus and UTS. Both significantly different in comparison with PCL
nanofibers (P<0.05, n=3). DHAM; Decellularized human amniotic membrane and UTS;
Ultimate tensile strength.
Scan electron microscopy characterization of bio-composites
SEM micrographs of aligned and random nanofibers
are shown in Figure 2A-E. A clear difference was
observed between engineered PCL-DHAM and DHAM
alone (Fig.2). The thickness of engineered PCL-DHAM
and DHAM were 0.15 ± 0.012 and 0.075 ± 0.010 mm,
respectively.
Fig.2
Chracterization of DHAM, random and aligned pattern. SEM characterization of all samples.
A. DHAM. B, D. Random pattern. C, E. Aligned
pattern (B, C; Low magnifcation: X500, D, E; High magnification: X1500). F.
Fiber diameter distribution histogram. Results are presented as the mean ± SD.
*; P<0.05, SEM; Scan electron microscopy, and DHAM; Decellularized human
amniotic membrane.
Micrographs A-E illustrated the detectable differences
between aligned (collector speed of 2500 RPM) and
random (collector speed of 1000 RPM), which 2500
RPM showed a more organized, when aligned nanofibers
arrangement compared to 1000 RPM (random nanofibers).
These images suggest that 2500 RPM represents aligned
electrospun fibers, where 1000 RPM represents randomly
oriented fibers.Nanofibers diameter was measured using Image J
software. We observed that the aligned fibers presented
a mean diameter of 1.266 μm, that significantly was
different (P<0.01) from the random pattern nanofibers
(0.69 μm, Fig.2F).In the random fibers, the majority of fiber diameters
were in the 0.4 μm range and in aligned fibers, the
diameter appears more than control group, the majority
of the fiber diameters was in the 1 μm range, that was
significant [(P<0.05), n=50 per fiber type, Fig.2F].Chracterization of DHAM, random and aligned pattern. SEM characterization of all samples.
A. DHAM. B, D. Random pattern. C, E. Aligned
pattern (B, C; Low magnifcation: X500, D, E; High magnification: X1500). F.
Fiber diameter distribution histogram. Results are presented as the mean ± SD.
*; P<0.05, SEM; Scan electron microscopy, and DHAM; Decellularized human
amniotic membrane.
In vitro degradation of nanofibrous scaffolds
The morphological changes in engineered scaffold during in vitro
degradation after a 2-week period was evaluated and significant morphological changes were
observed for aligned and random scaffold (Fig.3A-D). The PCL can be dissolved in water at
a temperature of 40˚C and hence biodegradability of PCL engineered scaffolds increased in
PBS over the 2-week period.
Fig.3
Biodegradability and cell viability of scaffolds. A. Aligned scaffold before
biodegradability test, B. Aligned scaffold after 2-weeks biodegradability
test, C. Random scaffold before biodegradability test, and
D. Random scaffold after 2-weeks biodegradability test. E.
Comparison of cell viability after 24 hours. MTT assay. Simple, two dimensional (2D)
ordinary culture. Random; Random pattern, Aligned; Align pattern, Control; DHAM alone,
DHAM; Decellularized human amniotic membrane, and *; P<0.01.
Cell viability on engineered PCL-DHAM
The viability of ADSC on scaffolds was assessed
through the measuring metabolic activity of cultured cells
by MTT assay. Cell viability was calculated by division
of the related absorbance (at 570 nm) to the absorbance
of control group (tissue culture plate) (Fig.3E). All of the
groups revealed higher cell viability in comparison with
control. Relative viability percent of the aligned pattern
illustrated the higher viability (220.83%) compared to
DHAM and random (P<0.01, Fig.3E). However, there
was no significant difference between DHAM with
random scaffold.Biodegradability and cell viability of scaffolds. A. Aligned scaffold before
biodegradability test, B. Aligned scaffold after 2-weeks biodegradability
test, C. Random scaffold before biodegradability test, and
D. Random scaffold after 2-weeks biodegradability test. E.
Comparison of cell viability after 24 hours. MTT assay. Simple, two dimensional (2D)
ordinary culture. Random; Random pattern, Aligned; Align pattern, Control; DHAM alone,
DHAM; Decellularized human amniotic membrane, and *; P<0.01.
Myogenic differentiation of ADSCs
To confirm myogenic differentiation of ADSCs grown
on amniotic scaffolds with different surface topographies,
specific protein of skeletal myoblasts was detected using
mouse anti-myosin (fast skeletal). Immunofluorescence
analysis demonstrated that cells cultured on various
scaffolds with different surface morphologies were
differentiated into myoblasts and produced fast skeletal myosin proteins when cultured in defined myogenic
differentiation medium. A stronger expression was
observed in the aligned pattern in comparison with
random pattern that clearly was noticeable (Fig.4A-C).
Fig.4
Evaluation of differentiated cells. I. Immunocytochemistry evaluation of differentiated ADSCs
grown on amniotic scaffolds with different surface topographies. A.
Negative control, B. Random, C. Aligned. Remarkable
differentiation in aligned as compared with random (scale bar: 50 μm). Expression of
D. Mhc2 and E.
Myogenin mRNA in experimental groups. Mhc2 and
Myogenin mRNA expression increased in aligned pattern compared with
random pattern (P<0.005). Data are presented as the mean ± SD of two separate
experiments. *; Comparison of random and aligned pattern, P<0.05, and ADSCs;
Adipose derived stem cells.
Expression of myogenic differentiation markers
After 7 days of myogenic differentiation induction, quantitative RT-PCR demonstrated
that mRNA expression of Mhc2 and Myogenin was increased
significantly in both aligned and random samples in comparison with control
(P<0.001). For Mhc2 and Myogenin, cells cultured
on aligned pattern showed significant (P<0.005) highly expression compared with
random pattern (Fig.4D, E).Evaluation of differentiated cells. I. Immunocytochemistry evaluation of differentiated ADSCs
grown on amniotic scaffolds with different surface topographies. A.
Negative control, B. Random, C. Aligned. Remarkable
differentiation in aligned as compared with random (scale bar: 50 μm). Expression of
D. Mhc2 and E.
Myogenin mRNA in experimental groups. Mhc2 and
Myogenin mRNA expression increased in aligned pattern compared with
random pattern (P<0.005). Data are presented as the mean ± SD of two separate
experiments. *; Comparison of random and aligned pattern, P<0.05, and ADSCs;
Adipose derived stem cells.
Myotube formation
Myotube formation, was clearly observed in both
scaffold, random and aligned. The myotubes were oriented
approximately parallel to the axes of parallel fibers in
aligned. In random pattern, the cells were less organized,
and their fusion was detected with no obvious orientation.
No apparent myotube formation was observed on DHAM
(Fig.5).
Fig.5
SEM evaluation of differentiated ADSCs grown on scaffolds with different surface topographies at
low (up row) and high (down row) magnification. A, D. DHAM. B,
E. Random, C, F. Aligned (A, C; X500 magnification, D, F; X1000
magnification). Arrows indicate the myotubes. SEM; Scan electron microscopy, ADSCs;
Adipose derived stem cells, and DHAM; Decellularized human amniotic membrane.
Thus, aligned pattern showed the higher organization and
parallel attachment and orientation compared with random
pattern , while both showed higher organization compared
with DHAM. To reveal these different presentations of
myotube formation, two different magnifications of SEM in
two rows have been shown (Fig.5).Myotube diameter was measured using Image J software
and aligned pattern was presented myotube formation
with a mean diameter of 13.261 ± 0.612 µm, that was
significantly different (P<0.05) from the random pattern
(2.222 ± 0.69 µm, Fig.6).
Fig.6
Comparison of myotube diameters between random and aligned.
Results are presented as the mean ± SD. *; P<0.05.
SEM evaluation of differentiated ADSCs grown on scaffolds with different surface topographies at
low (up row) and high (down row) magnification. A, D. DHAM. B,
E. Random, C, F. Aligned (A, C; X500 magnification, D, F; X1000
magnification). Arrows indicate the myotubes. SEM; Scan electron microscopy, ADSCs;
Adipose derived stem cells, and DHAM; Decellularized human amniotic membrane.Comparison of myotube diameters between random and aligned.
Results are presented as the mean ± SD. *; P<0.05.
Discussion
One of the critical challenges for bioengineers in the
skeletal muscle regeneration is to create and maintain the
myogenic cells organization and remodeling (25). It may
overcome some of direct cell application limitations and achieve a myoblasts substitute for degenerated muscle,
on an appropriate scaffold that supports their growth and
myotube formation (26).The HAM, an important choice for scaffold material,
has achieved the interest of researchers in the field
of regenerative medicine (17). Despite the noticeable
regenerative potential of HAM, the high preservation
cost and relatively weak mechanical strength are the
main limitations of its application in fresh and dehydrated
forms (18).In the present study, we designed and fabricated an
engineered biocomposite scaffold of DHAM and PCL
to achieve a desirable and more applicable scaffold for
myotube differentiation and remodeling. Our established
PCL-DHAM biocomposite ameliorated the alignment
pattern, stiffness, biodegradability and the mechanical
characteristics of engineered scaffold. Our data showed
that aligned PCL superimposed on DHAM promoted
cell growth and improved the route of differentiation and
enhanced the myotube formation.Some studies have been designed a biocomposite
scaffold that an electrospun fibers plus DHAM was applied
for skeletal tissue repair and showed the advantages of
both DHAM and electrospun fiber mesh (21, 22). Hasmad
et al. (22) have applied a biomimetic scaffold composed
of DHAM and poly lactic-glycolic acid (PLGA) for
reconstruction of skeletal muscle and they found that the
aligned biocomposite scaffold can improve this process.
They have used a combination of PLGA and DHAM
for assessment the viability and migration rate and also
the alignment pattern of skeletal muscle cells. They also
evaluated the role of different time points (3, 5, 7 minutes)
in designing an electrospun PLGA information a suitable
biocomposite with DHAM for alignment of skeletal
muscle cells. Therefore, the purpose of their study was
evaluation the behavior of differentiated skeletal muscle
cells, by using a blend scaffold (PLGA-DHAM), and
different time points. Whereas, in our study, we have used
a differential bio-composite of DHAM (PCL-DHAM)
for evaluation of the differentiation process progress
of stem cells derived from adipose tissue into skeletal
muscle. The main point in our study was an evaluation of
the differentiation mechanism of a selected stem cell to
skeletal muscle cells, but in their study, reconstruction of
skeletal muscle cells was investigated.Previous studies have shown that simple and cost-effective methods for decellularization and preservation
of HAM using new chemical and mechanical procedures
do not deteriorate the mechanical properties of the tissue
(27). In recent years, a number of methods for the removal
of cells from HAM have been developed (28). In this
study, cells were removed from HAM using 0.1% EDTA
and mechanical scraping of the remaining epithelial
cells. As reported in some earlier studies, no significant
cytotoxicity, and no changes were observed in the rate of
cell proliferation by MTT assay (19, 21, 22). It should be
noted that in our method, because of using mechanical
method such as scraping, the chance of artifacts increased.It has been previously reported the difficulties of
handling the freshly prepared DHAM and lyophilized
DHAM. In contrast, the composite membrane is robust
and easy to manipulate in both states, lyophilized and
rehydrated. The rehydrated DHAM is prone to adhere
to itself and difficult to unfold. Unlike to previous
studies, the rehydrated composite membrane that was
prepared from PCL and DHAM, keeps the membrane
shape well, as a result of higher levels of stiffness (29).
The mechanical properties of the rehydrated DHAM
and composite membrane were characterized. The
data showed that the DHAM, and its UTS and Young’s
modulus were markedly lower than the composite
membrane. Therefore, the composite could remarkably
improve the tensile and mechanical properties of
DHAM. On the other hand, some studies have shown
that the amniotic composite membranes exhibit major
advantages for clinical applications in treating ocular,
skin and urinary bladder damages (29-31).It is well known that mechanical properties of materials
which are utilized for muscle tissue engineering can also
significantly affect myogenic differentiation. Soft scaffolds
are suitable for neurogenic capabilities and stiffer features
present myogenic traits. And also, rigid biomaterials that
mimic collagenous characteristics lead to osteogenesis. In
addition, an intermediate stiffness similar to muscle tissue
is resulted in myogenic differentiation (32).Many studies have shown that interactions between
matrix elasticity and cell-generated forces affect the
intracellular signaling or mechanical transduction
(32, 33). The first step in muscle regeneration
is differentiation of MSCs into myoblasts, but
the subsequent fusion of myoblasts and further
differentiation into functional myotubes must be
happened (33). Substrate stiffness cues have been
indicated to play an important role in the formation
of functional myotubes. The combination of multipolymer composites, molecular weights of polymers,
crosslinking agents and cross- linking times are
variables of which the changes can control the
substrate stiffness (34). These results are in agreement
with our study in which the elastic modulus of the
resulting substrates was mostly in favor of myogenic
differentiation and myotube formation in aligned
group (~2.5 MPa).To induce myoblast alignment, electrospinning
was applied to generate aligned nanofiber scaffolds.
Electrospun fibers exhibit a 3D structure that is similar
to the physical structure of native collagen fibers or
ECM. Despite the fact that electrospun scaffolds display
3D structures, the dense packing of electrospun fibers
prevented cell infiltration into the fiber network in some
studies (32-34). This leads to cells proliferated mostly
on the top side of the electrospun fibers, resulting in
tissue formation similar to that formed using other 2D
topographic substrates (35). To overcome of this problem, several substrates and scaffolds have been produced
with a variety of surface topographical features (such as
aligned, randomized, and patterned) (32-35).According to the aforementioned , it seems our results
also suggest that topographical cues and the stiffness of
PCL-DHAM composites synergistically stimulate muscle
cell differentiation (25, 34-38).Considering 5 minutes for the electroporation, and
subsequently, electrospun fiber’s surface and DHAM
protein component interaction, we observed generating
an integrated membrane structure that not only strongly
ameliorated the mechanical properties of the DHAM,
but also presented more elasticity of nanofibers network.
Recently, it has been shown that direct electrospinning of a
3D aligned nanofibrous tube has been recognized by cells,
promoting cell alignment and myotube formation. Using
oriented cellulose nanowhiskers, Dugan et al. (39) showed
that myoblasts could successfully sense the topography of
such a surface, and myotubes formed by myoblast fusion
were nearly oriented in the same direction as the cellulose
nano-whiskers. These studies are in consistent with our
findings that indicates cells’ sensitivity to topographical
features, which affects the cell orientation, shape, and
differentiation.The present study reports that the CL-DHAM composite,
a myogenic biomimetic scaffold, is capable of providing a
preferred environment for directing ADSC differentiation
toward myogenic, as shown by myogenic marker genes
and SEM. Our data showed that the DHAM composite
by having properties such as good mechanic and
topography can provide the cues and suitable elasticity
for the alignment and further fusion of myoblasts and
reformation the skeletal muscle.
Conclusion
PCL-DHAM biocomposite as a scaffold demonstrated a
promising potential in facilitating myogenic differentiation
of stem cells, such as ADSCs by modulating an appropriate
environment for the selected stem cells. Therefore, a
biomimetic composite prepared from a nanofibrous scaffold,
may represent a promising biomaterial for applying in
bioengineered peripheral muscle repair and myogenic
differentiation.
Authors: Keith W VanDusen; Brian C Syverud; Michael L Williams; Jonah D Lee; Lisa M Larkin Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2014-06-23 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Alessandro F Martins; Suelen P Facchi; Paulo C F da Câmara; Samira E A Camargo; Carlos H R Camargo; Ketul C Popat; Matt J Kipper Journal: J Colloid Interface Sci Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 8.128
Authors: Huanhuan Liu; Zhengbing Zhou; Hui Lin; Juan Wu; Brian Ginn; Ji Suk Choi; Xuesong Jiang; Liam Chung; Jennifer H Elisseeff; Samuel Yiu; Hai-Quan Mao Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 9.229