Literature DB >> 27873338

High myopes have lower normalised corneal tangent moduli (less 'stiff' corneas) than low myopes.

Ying Hon1, Guo-Zhen Chen2, Shu-Hao Lu2, David C C Lam2, Andrew K C Lam1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare corneal tangent moduli between low and high myopes.
METHODS: Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) of 32 low and 32 high myopes were obtained using an Ocular Response Analyzer, followed by a corneal indentation device that measured corneal stiffness. Corneal topography, pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry intraocular pressure (GAT-IOP), and corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) were also obtained. Corneal tangent modulus was calculated on the basis of corneal stiffness, central corneal thickness and corneal radius. Comparisons between groups and associations between corneal biomechanical and ocular parameters were performed.
RESULTS: Corneal tangent moduli were positively correlated with GAT-IOP (R2 = 0.078, p = 0.025), and IOPcc (R2 = 0.12, p = 0.006). Despite similarity in corneal thickness and radius, high myopes exhibited a significantly higher IOPcc (16.4 ± 2.51 mmHg) than low myopes (13.1 ± 1.96 mmHg; t(62) = -5.57, p < 0.0001). Both groups had similar corneal stiffness (0.063 ± 0.0085 and 0.063 ± 0.0079 N mm-1 for low and high myopes, respectively) and CRF (9.6 ± 1.58 and 9.5 ± 1.90 mmHg for low and high myopes, respectively). Moreover, high myopes exhibited a significantly lower CH (9.5 ± 1.51 mmHg) than low myopes (10.6 ± 1.38 mmHg; t(62) = 2.92, p = 0.005). After normalising corneal tangent moduli to the mean intraocular pressure in normal eyes (15.5 mmHg) using IOPcc, high myopes showed a significantly lower corneal tangent moduli (0.47 ± 0.087 MPa) than low myopes (0.57 ± 0.099 MPa; t(62) = 4.17, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: High myopes had lower normalised corneal tangent moduli than low myopes, which indicated that their corneas were less stiff. This is the first in vivo study comparing elastic moduli of the cornea in different refractive groups. Further studies are warranted to understand whether a less stiff cornea is a cause for or an outcome from myopia development.
© 2016 The Authors Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2016 The College of Optometrists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corneal biomechanics; corneal indentation; elastic modulus; stiffness

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27873338     DOI: 10.1111/opo.12335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  12 in total

1.  Optical coherence elastography for assessing the influence of intraocular pressure on elastic wave dispersion in the cornea.

Authors:  Michael G Sun; Taeyoon Son; Joseph Crutison; Victor Guaiquil; Shujun Lin; Lara Nammari; Dieter Klatt; Xincheng Yao; Mark I Rosenblatt; Thomas J Royston
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2022-01-29

2.  Biophysical properties of corneal cells reflect high myopia progression.

Authors:  Ying Xin; Byung Soo Kang; Yong-Ping Zheng; Sze Wan Shan; Chea-Su Kee; Youhua Tan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.699

3.  In vivo measurement of regional corneal tangent modulus.

Authors:  Ying Hon; Guo-Zhen Chen; Shu-Hao Lu; David Cc Lam; Andrew Kc Lam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  High myopia induced by form deprivation is associated with altered corneal biomechanical properties in chicks.

Authors:  Byung Soo Kang; Li-Ke Wang; Yong-Ping Zheng; Jeremy A Guggenheim; William K Stell; Chea-Su Kee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Preliminary Investigation of the Mechanical Anisotropy of the Normal Human Corneal Stroma.

Authors:  Chao Xue; Yaoqi Xiang; Min Shen; Di Wu; Yan Wang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Association between long-term orthokeratology responses and corneal biomechanics.

Authors:  Andrew K C Lam; Ying Hon; Stanley Y Y Leung; Lu Shu-Ho; Jones Chong; David C C Lam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A clinical method for estimating the modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo.

Authors:  David C Pye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Varying Severities of Myopia.

Authors:  Mohammad-Reza Sedaghat; Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Abbas Azimi; Zohreh Fakhimi; Mohammed Ziaei; Zeynad Danesh; Cynthia J Roberts; Naeemeh Monfared; Alireza Jamali
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-21

9.  Comparison of Corneal Wave Speed and Ocular Rigidity in Normal and Glaucomatous Eyes.

Authors:  Arash Kazemi; Boran Zhou; Xiaoming Zhang; Arthur J Sit
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.290

10.  Age-Related Variations of Rabbit Corneal Geometrical and Clinical Biomechanical Parameters.

Authors:  Haixia Zhang; Xiao Qin; Xiaomeng Cao; Di Zhang; Lin Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-13       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.