| Literature DB >> 27869802 |
Louise Carter1, Dominic G Rothwell1, Barbara Mesquita1, Christopher Smowton1, Hui Sun Leong2, Fabiola Fernandez-Gutierrez1, Yaoyong Li3, Deborah J Burt1, Jenny Antonello1, Christopher J Morrow1, Cassandra L Hodgkinson1, Karen Morris1, Lynsey Priest1, Mathew Carter1, Crispin Miller2,4, Andrew Hughes5, Fiona Blackhall6,7, Caroline Dive1,7, Ged Brady1.
Abstract
In most patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC)-a metastatic, aggressive disease-the condition is initially chemosensitive but then relapses with acquired chemoresistance. In a minority of patients, however, relapse occurs within 3 months of initial treatment; in these cases, disease is defined as chemorefractory. The molecular mechanisms that differentiate chemosensitive from chemorefractory disease are currently unknown. To identify genetic features that distinguish chemosensitive from chemorefractory disease, we examined copy-number aberrations (CNAs) in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from pretreatment SCLC blood samples. After analysis of 88 CTCs isolated from 13 patients (training set), we generated a CNA-based classifier that we validated in 18 additional patients (testing set, 112 CTC samples) and in six SCLC patient-derived CTC explant tumors. The classifier correctly assigned 83.3% of the cases as chemorefractory or chemosensitive. Furthermore, a significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (PFS) (Kaplan-Meier P value = 0.0166) between patients designated as chemorefractory or chemosensitive by using the baseline CNA classifier. Notably, CTC CNA profiles obtained at relapse from five patients with initially chemosensitive disease did not switch to a chemorefractory CNA profile, which suggests that the genetic basis for initial chemoresistance differs from that underlying acquired chemoresistance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27869802 DOI: 10.1038/nm.4239
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Med ISSN: 1078-8956 Impact factor: 53.440