Literature DB >> 14579089

Comparison of 180 degrees and 360 degrees data acquisition for determination of left ventricular function from gated myocardial perfusion tomography and gated blood pool tomography.

Christian Vanhove1, Philippe R Franken, Michel Defrise, Axel Bossuyt.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to address the issue of 180 degrees versus 360 degrees data collection for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular volume measurements using gated myocardial perfusion tomography (gMPT) and gated blood pool tomography (gBPT). Thirty patients with known coronary artery disease were injected in a random sequence with 925 MBq of technetium-99m tetrofosmin and, within 2 days, with 740 MBq of (99m)Tc-labelled human serum albumin. gMPT and gBPT were acquired using 360 degrees data collection and reconstructed by filtered backprojection using all the acquired projection images and separately using only projection images acquired from 45 degrees LPO to 45 degrees RAO. In order to have the same global count densities, the counts in the 360 degrees data set were redistributed using binomial deviates just before reconstruction. After reorientation along the left ventricular long axis, LVEF and left ventricular volumes were calculated using fully automatic algorithms. Twenty-eight patients also underwent planar radionuclide angiocardiography (PRNA) on the same day as the gBPT. For the gMPT studies, the correlation between 180 degrees data collection and 360 degrees data collection was excellent ( r>0.98). Bland-Altman analysis revealed small systematic and random differences (<6%) between 180 degrees and 360 degrees. For the gBPT studies, the correlation between 180 degrees data collection and 360 degrees data collection was very good ( r>0.93). However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed systematic differences of 26% and random differences of 17%. When PRNA was used as a reference, the best results were obtained with gMPT acquired using 180 degrees data, while the worst results were obtained with gBPT acquired using 180 degrees data. In conclusion, when evaluating LVEF and left ventricular volumes from gMPT, either 180 degrees or 360 degrees orbits can be used. However, 360 degrees data acquisition is recommended when evaluating LVEF and left ventricular volumes from gBPT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14579089     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1267-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  17 in total

1.  Accuracy and reproducibility of left ventricular function from quantitative, gated, single photon emission computed tomography using dynamic myocardial phantoms: effect of pre-reconstruction filters.

Authors:  N Kubo; M Mabuchi; C Katoh; K Morita; E Tsukamoto; Y Morita; N Tamaki
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.690

2.  Gated SPET quantification of small hearts: mathematical simulation and clinical application.

Authors:  K Nakajima; J Taki; T Higuchi; M Kawano; M Taniguchi; K Maruhashi; S Sakazume; N Tonami
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-09

3.  Differential effect of 180 degrees and 360 degrees acquisition orbits on the accuracy of SPECT imaging: quantitative evaluation in phantoms.

Authors:  Yi-Hwa Liu; Peter T Lam; Albert J Sinusas; Frans J Th Wackers
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  An investigation of the estimation of ejection fractions and cardiac volumes by a quantitative gated SPECT software package in simulated gated SPECT images.

Authors:  A D Achtert; M A King; S T Dahlberg; P H Pretorius; K J LaCroix; B M Tsui
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Comparison between 180 degrees and 360 degrees data collection in technetium-99m MIBI SPECT of the myocardium.

Authors:  J C Maublant; P Peycelon; F Kwiatkowski; J R Lusson; R H Standke; A Veyre
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Investigation of causes of geometric distortion in 180 degrees and 360 degrees angular sampling in SPECT.

Authors:  K Knesaurek; M A King; S J Glick; B C Penney
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Automatic determination of left ventricular ejection fraction from gated blood-pool tomography.

Authors:  C Vanhove; P R Franken; M Defrise; A Momen; H Everaert; A Bossuyt
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Clinical comparison of 180-degree and 360-degree data collection of technetium 99m sestamibi SPECT for detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  M R Freeman; C Konstantinou; A Barr; N D Greyson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Accuracy of ventricular volume and ejection fraction measured by gated myocardial SPECT: comparison of 4 software programs.

Authors:  K Nakajima; T Higuchi; J Taki; M Kawano; N Tonami
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  6 in total

1.  Tomographic equilibrium radionuclide angiography: has its time arrived?

Authors:  Steven C Port
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Gated SPECT in assessment of regional and global left ventricular function: major tool of modern nuclear imaging.

Authors:  Aiden Abidov; Guido Germano; Rory Hachamovitch; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  SPECT radionuclide angiography: it is time for a consensus statement.

Authors:  Doumit Daou
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Gated SPECT in assessment of regional and global left ventricular function: an update.

Authors:  Aiden Abidov; Guido Germano; Rory Hachamovitch; Piotr Slomka; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Comparison of 180° and 360° Arc Data Acquisition to Measure Scintigraphic Parameters from Gated Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Is There Any Difference?

Authors:  Hamid Javadi; Ali Mahmoud-Pashazadeh; Mehdi Mogharrabi; Darioush Iranpour; Abdollatif Amini; Mohammadreza Pourbehi; Mehdi Akbarzadeh; Iraj Nabipour; Majid Assadi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther       Date:  2016-02-05

6.  Fast technetium-99m liver SPECT for evaluation of the pretreatment procedure for radioembolization dosimetry.

Authors:  Sandra van der Velden; Martijn M A Dietze; Max A Viergever; Hugo W A M de Jong
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.071

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.