Literature DB >> 27867654

Patient-prosthesis mismatch: surgical aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement in high risk patients with aortic stenosis.

Ravi K Ghanta1, Irving L Kron1.   

Abstract

Patient prosthesis mismatch (PPM) can occur when a prosthetic aortic valve has an effective orifice area (EOA) less than that of a native valve. A recent study by Zorn and colleagues evaluated the incidence and significance of PPM in high risk patients with severe aortic stenosis who were randomized to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). TAVR is associated with decreased incidence of severe PPM compared to traditional SAVR valves. Severe PPM increases risk for death at 1 year postoperatively in high risk patients. The increased incidence of PPM is largely due to differences in valve design and should encourage development of newer SAVR valves to reduce risk for PPM. In addition more vigorous approaches to root enlargement in small annulus should be performed with SAVR to prevent PPM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; aortic valve replacement; outcomes; transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)

Year:  2016        PMID: 27867654      PMCID: PMC5107449          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.09.62

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  9 in total

Review 1.  The impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186 patients with 133 141 patient-years.

Authors:  Stuart J Head; Mostafa M Mokhles; Ruben L J Osnabrugge; Philippe Pibarot; Michael J Mack; Johanna J M Takkenberg; Ad J J C Bogers; Arie Pieter Kappetein
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Is prosthesis-patient mismatch a clinically relevant entity?

Authors:  Tirone E David
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Incidence and sequelae of prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter versus surgical valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: a PARTNER trial cohort--a analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Pibarot; Neil J Weissman; William J Stewart; Rebecca T Hahn; Brian R Lindman; Thomas McAndrew; Susheel K Kodali; Michael J Mack; Vinod H Thourani; D Craig Miller; Lars G Svensson; Howard C Herrmann; Craig R Smith; Josep Rodés-Cabau; John Webb; Scott Lim; Ke Xu; Irene Hueter; Pamela S Douglas; Martin B Leon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  One-year outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial: a prospective multicenter study of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System.

Authors:  Alfred A Kocher; Günther Laufer; Axel Haverich; Malakh Shrestha; Thomas Walther; Martin Misfeld; Joerg Kempfert; Linda Gillam; Christoph Schmitz; Thorsten C Wahlers; Jens Wippermann; Friedrich W Mohr; Matthias Roth; Adalbert Skwara; Parwis Rahmanian; Dominik Wiedemann; Michael A Borger
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis.

Authors:  David H Adams; Jeffrey J Popma; Michael J Reardon; Steven J Yakubov; Joseph S Coselli; G Michael Deeb; Thomas G Gleason; Maurice Buchbinder; James Hermiller; Neal S Kleiman; Stan Chetcuti; John Heiser; William Merhi; George Zorn; Peter Tadros; Newell Robinson; George Petrossian; G Chad Hughes; J Kevin Harrison; John Conte; Brijeshwar Maini; Mubashir Mumtaz; Sharla Chenoweth; Jae K Oh
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Contemporary real-world outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement in 141,905 low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients.

Authors:  Vinod H Thourani; Rakesh M Suri; Rebecca L Gunter; Shubin Sheng; Sean M O'Brien; Gorav Ailawadi; Wilson Y Szeto; Todd M Dewey; Robert A Guyton; Joseph E Bavaria; Vasilis Babaliaros; James S Gammie; Lars Svensson; Mathew Williams; Vinay Badhwar; Michael J Mack
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: A randomized trial of a self-expanding prosthesis.

Authors:  George L Zorn; Stephen H Little; Peter Tadros; G Michael Deeb; Thomas G Gleason; John Heiser; Neal S Kleiman; Jae K Oh; Jeffrey J Popma; David Adams; Jian Huang; Michael J Reardon
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 8.  The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch.

Authors:  S H Rahimtoola
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Comparison of hemodynamic performance of self-expandable CoreValve versus balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN aortic valves inserted by catheter for aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Luis Nombela-Franco; Marc Ruel; Sam Radhakrishnan; John G Webb; Marc Hansen; Marino Labinaz; Chris Thompson; Stephen Fremes; Eric Dumont; Robert DeLarochellière; Daniel Doyle; Marina Urena; Michael Mok; Henrique Barbosa Ribeiro; Idan Roifman; Stuart Watkins; Jean G Dumesnil; Philippe Pibarot; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 2.778

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Early and mid-term results of isolated aortic valve neocuspidization in patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Yasunori Iida; Susumu Fujii; Sho Akiyama; Shigeharu Sawa
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-07-25

2.  Early outcomes of patient-prosthesis mismatch following aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Serik Aitaliyev; Egle Rumbinaitė; Karolina Mėlinytė-Ankudavičė; Rokas Nekrošius; Vytenis Keturakis; Rimantas Benetis
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 1.581

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.