Literature DB >> 27867408

Reliability of a measurement method for the cross-sectional area of the longus colli using real-time ultrasound imaging.

Cliona O'Riordan1, Pepijn Van De Ven2, John Nelson2, Karen McCreesh1, Amanda Clifford1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Real-time ultrasound imaging is an established objective outcome measurement with proven reliability. However, it is still largely biased by user-ability. Published research in the area of real-time ultrasound imaging reliability in the cervical region and in particular the deep cervical flexors is quite sparse. The purpose of this investigation was to examine if a novice ultrasound user could agree favourably with an experienced ultrasound sonographer in measuring the cross-sectional area of the longus colli.
METHODS: Ultrasound images were captured from 22 healthy subjects on two different occasions, one week apart, by a novice ultrasound user. They were acquired using a GE Healthcare LOGIQe ultrasound machine, at a depth of 3-4 cm with the transducer frequency set to 8 MHz, in line with previous research guidelines. Cross-sectional area was then measured on-screen by both a novice and experienced ultrasound user to determine inter-rater reliability. Intra-rater reliability was also analysed using cross-sectional area figures from days one and two.
RESULTS: Intra-rater reliability for real-time ultrasound imaging for the cross-sectional area of the longus colli was "excellent" (intra-class correlation 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.95). Inter-rater reliability was "moderate" but in keeping with previous published research (intra-class correlation 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-0.77).
CONCLUSION: Difficulties in identifying the borders of the longus colli muscle due to its deep anatomical location and surrounding structures make it difficult for assessors to agree favourably on cross-sectional area measurements, leading to "moderate" levels of inter-rater reliability and poor agreement. Intra-rater reliability is excellent, and in this instance indicates that a novice user can be just as reliable as a more experienced ultrasound user.

Keywords:  Real-time; longus colli; reliability; ultrasound

Year:  2016        PMID: 27867408      PMCID: PMC5105367          DOI: 10.1177/1742271X16659099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  23 in total

1.  Low back pain.

Authors:  George E Ehrlich
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Reliability of ultrasonography for the cervical multifidus muscle in asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Eythor Kristjansson
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2004-05

Review 3.  Ultrasonography of the cervical muscles: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Khodabakhsh Javanshir; Mohsen Amiri; Mohammad Ali Mohseni-Bandpei; Asghar Rezasoltani; César Fernández-de-las-Peñas
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 1.437

4.  The use of real-time ultrasound feedback in teaching abdominal hollowing exercises to healthy subjects.

Authors:  Sharon M Henry; Karen C Westervelt
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  The use of real-time ultrasound imaging for biofeedback of lumbar multifidus muscle contraction in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Khai Van; Julie A Hides; Carolyn A Richardson
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging: understanding the technology and its applications.

Authors:  Jackie L Whittaker; Deydre S Teyhen; James M Elliott; Katy Cook; Helene M Langevin; Haldis H Dahl; Maria Stokes
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Immediate changes in feedforward postural adjustments following voluntary motor training.

Authors:  Henry Tsao; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effectiveness of dynamic muscle training, relaxation training, or ordinary activity for chronic neck pain: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Matti Viljanen; Antti Malmivaara; Jukka Uitti; Marjo Rinne; Pirjo Palmroos; Pekka Laippala
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-30

9.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Strength and cross-sectional area of human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  R J Maughan; J S Watson; J Weir
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.