| Literature DB >> 27867233 |
Rong Wang1, Yves Balkanski2, Laurent Bopp2, Olivier Aumont3, Olivier Boucher4, Philippe Ciais2, Marion Gehlen2, Josep Peñuelas5, Christian Ethé6, Didier Hauglustaine2, Bengang Li7, Junfeng Liu7, Feng Zhou7, Shu Tao7.
Abstract
Satellite data and models suggest that oceanic productivity is reduced in response to less nutrient supply under warming. In contrast, anthropogenic aerosols provide nutrients and exert a fertilizing effect, but its contribution to evolution of oceanic productivity is unknown. We simulate the response of oceanic biogeochemistry to anthropogenic aerosols deposition under varying climate from 1850 to 2010. We find a positive response of observed chlorophyll to deposition of anthropogenic aerosols. Our results suggest that anthropogenic aerosols reduce the sensitivity of oceanic productivity to warming from -15.2 ± 1.8 to -13.3 ± 1.6 Pg C yr-1 °C-1 in global stratified oceans during 1948-2007. The reducing percentage over the North Atlantic, North Pacific, and Indian Oceans reaches 40, 24, and 25%, respectively. We hypothesize that inevitable reduction of aerosol emissions in response to higher air quality standards in the future might accelerate the decline of oceanic productivity per unit warming.Entities:
Keywords: anthropogenic aerosols; nutrient limitation; ocean biogeochemical model; ocean productivity
Year: 2015 PMID: 27867233 PMCID: PMC5102162 DOI: 10.1002/2015GL066753
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Geophys Res Lett ISSN: 0094-8276 Impact factor: 4.720
Figure 1Atmospheric emissions and oceanic deposition of N, P, and Fe from 1850 to 2010. Emissions of (a) Nr, (b) PO4, and (c) sFe from different sources (“PBAPs” stands for primary biogenic aerosol particles). Oceanic deposition of (d) DIN, (e) PO4, and (f) sFe, for snapshot years (dots). Previous estimates of deposition are shown as purple [Duce et al., 2008] or yellow [Krishnamurthy et al., 2010] triangles.
Figure 2Impact of AAD on nutrients, [Chl], and NPP. Primary limiting nutrient for nanophytoplankton. In‐fill color shows the element most frequently limiting nanophytoplanktonic growth by month during 1948–2007 (a) with or (b) without AAD. The contour line is for the modeled nutrient limitation factor (LIM) of 0.05. The shaded area indicates LIM < 0.05 with a stringent nutrient limitation. Observed limiting nutrients (circles) are from nutrient addition experiments [Moore et al., 2013]. Influence of AAD on the modeled (c) DIN, (d) sFe, (e) PO4, and (f) [Chl] and (g) NPP as DEP‐CTL differences (RDs) relative to CTL for 1948–2007. RD is computed for the 0–30 m layer for nutrients and [Chl] and the 0–100 m layer for NPP. Contour lines are shown for RDs of ±10% (solid) and ±30% (dashed). (H) Frequency distribution of RD (negative for PO4) in Figures 2c– 2g. Comparison of modeled and observed [Chl] (i) with or (j) without (w/o) AAD. Plots are made in a log scale, with colors indicating the density of data in the panel. Number of sites (n), normalized mean bias (NMB), and root‐mean‐square deviation (RMSD) are shown. All measurement sites are divided into four quartiles of modeled [Chl] without AAD. [Chl] in the (k‐m) first and (n–p) second quartiles are plotted against anthropogenic deposition (Dep.) of sFe (Figures 2k and 2n) or DIN (Figures 2l and 2o) and compared with the observations. [Chl] are averaged at an interval of 0.5 of (log10) deposition. The shaded areas show the difference modeled with or without AAD. The modeled [Chl] with anthropogenic deposition of only N (DEP‐N), Fe (DEP‐Fe), or P (DEP‐P) are shown. Error bars show standard deviations of observed [Chl].
Figure 3Relationship between annual NPP and SST for 1948–2007. NPP is computed in the model and SST is from the observations. (a) The permanently stratified oceans defined by Behrenfeld et al. [2006] are divided into (b) North Pacific, (c) North Atlantic, and (d) Indian Oceans. The circles show the relationship between NPP and SST under warming alone (red) or warming and AAD together (blue). The slope of NPP to SST (Pg C yr−1 °C−1) and coefficient of determination (r 2) are estimated from least squares regression analysis.