Literature DB >> 27867051

Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Evelien M Sandberg1, Andries R H Twijnstra2, Sara R C Driessen1, Frank Willem Jansen3.   

Abstract

Hysterectomies performed laparoscopically have greatly increased within the last few decades and even exceed the number of vaginal hysterectomies (VHs). This systematic review, conducted according to the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines, compares surgical outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and VH to evaluate which approach offers the most benefits. A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for all relevant publications from January 2000 to February 2016. All randomized controlled trials and cohort studies for benign indication or low-grade malignancy comparing TLH with VH were considered for inclusion. From the literature search, 24 articles were found to be relevant and included in this review. The results of our meta-analysis showed no difference between the 2 groups for overall complications (OR 1.24 [.68, 2.28] for major complications; OR .83 [.53, 1.28] for minor complications), risk of ureter and bladder injuries (OR .81 [.34, 1.92]), intraoperative blood loss (mean difference [MD] -30 mL [-67.34, 7.60]), and length of hospital stay (-.61 days [-1.23, -.01]). VH was associated with a shorter operative time (MD 42 minute [29.34, 55.91]) and a lower rate of vaginal cuff dehiscence (OR 6.28 [2.38, 16.57]) and conversion to laparotomy (OR 3.89 [2.18, 6.95]). Although not significant, the costs of procedure were lower for VH (MD 3889.9 dollars [2120.3, 89 000]). Patients in the TLH group had lower postoperative visual analog scale scores (MD -1.08, [-1.74, -.42]) and required less analgesia during a shorter period of time (MD -.64 days, [-1.06, -.22]). Defining the best surgical approach is a dynamic process that requires frequent re-evaluation as techniques improve. Although TLH and VH result in similar outcomes, our meta-analysis showed that when both procedures are feasible, VH is currently still associated with greater benefits, such as shorter operative time, lower rate of vaginal dehiscence and conversion to laparotomy, and lower costs. Many factors influence the choice for surgical approach to hysterectomy, and shared decision-making is recommended.
Copyright © 2016 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Surgical approach to hysterectomy; Surgical outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27867051     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  18 in total

Review 1.  Historical perspective of vaginal hysterectomy: the resilience of art and evidence-based medicine in the age of technology.

Authors:  Gisele Vissoci Marquini; Leticia Maria de Oliveira; Sérgio Brasileiro Martins; Claudia Cristina Takano; Zsuzsanna Ilona Katalin de Jarmy Di-Bella; Marair Gracio Ferreira Sartori
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  [Robot-assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy in a patient with giant uterine fibroids and complex pelvic adhesions: a case report].

Authors:  M Chen; N Wang; Y Ye; M Wang; Z Li; Y Meng; M Ye
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2022-02-20

3.  The Role of Hysterectomy in Modern Gynaecological Surgery.

Authors:  H Krentel; R L De Wilde; G Pados
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.246

4.  Response to Nahshon and Lavie.

Authors:  Cornelis D de Kroon; Marthe M de Jonge; Tjalling Bosse; Christi J van Asperen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 11.816

5.  Feasibility and safety of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for huge uteri without the use of uterine manipulator: description of emblematic cases.

Authors:  Antonio Macciò; Clelia Madeddu; Paraskevas Kotsonis; Giacomo Chiappe; Fabrizio Lavra; Ivan Collu; Roberto Demontis
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2018-02-26

6.  Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Female-to-Male Gender Affirmation Surgery: Comparison of Two Methods.

Authors:  M Jeftovic; B Stojanovic; M Bizic; D Stanojevic; J Kisic; M Bencic; M L Djordjevic
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Regional variation of hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases in Switzerland.

Authors:  Nina Stoller; Maria M Wertli; Tabea M Zaugg; Alan G Haynes; Arnaud Chiolero; Nicolas Rodondi; Radoslaw Panczak; Drahomir Aujesky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Quality of life in patients who undergo conventional or robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Rodrigo Corvino Rodrigues; Meline Rossetto Kron Rodrigues; Noélle de Oliveira Freitas; Marilza Vieira Cunha Rudge; Silvana Andréa Molina Lima
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Two-Layer Compared With One-Layer Vaginal Cuff Closure at the Time of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy to Reduce Complications.

Authors:  Ann Peters; Riyas Ali; Shana Miles; Christine E Foley; Alexandra Buffie; Kristine Ruppert; Suketu M Mansuria
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 7.623

10.  Changes in Hysterectomy Route and Adnexal Removal for Benign Disease in Australia 2001-2015: A National Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Natalie De Cure; Stephen J Robson
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2018-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.