Literature DB >> 35782083

The Role of Hysterectomy in Modern Gynaecological Surgery.

H Krentel1, R L De Wilde2, G Pados3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35782083      PMCID: PMC9249513          DOI: 10.1155/2022/9847163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.246


× No keyword cloud information.
Hysterectomy plays a major role in gynecological surgery. The list of indications for hysterectomy is long and includes a variety of benign and malignant diseases. Over the last decades, new techniques allowed the implementation of new surgical approaches. Vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy has been complemented by laparoscopic procedures, such as vaginal hysterectomy assisted by laparoscopy, laparoscopic subtotal and total hysterectomy, and robotic hysterectomy. The implementation of new techniques was related to “new” complications, a series of studies comparing the alternative approaches for hysterectomy and an ongoing craftsmanship among gynecological surgeons about what is possible in laparoscopic surgery [1] [2] [3]. At the same time, a contrary movement dedicated to the preservation of the uterus emerged [4] [5] [6]. Hysterectomy was no longer the only solution in many uterine diseases, as techniques like radiofrequency ablation, uterine artery embolization, high-focused ultrasound, endometrial ablation, and minimally invasive tumor enucleation allowed uterus-sparing procedures in symptomatic patients. In this situation, we raised the question: what is the role of hysterectomy in modern gynecological surgery? G. K. Noé et al. focused on surgical techniques in pelvic floor disorders. The authors emphasized that hysterectomy requires its own indication and should not automatically be part of every pelvic floor intervention [7]. L. A. Torres-de la Roche et al. described a possible complication of uterine artery embolization and discussed the role of hysterectomy as a secondary intervention after treatment failure in uterus-sparing techniques [8]. While Q. Zhang et al. described the impact of B7-H4 expression in precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix and the decision-making process regarding follow-up and conization in patients with CIN2 [9], R. Wojdat et al. presented a retrospective analysis of their experience with vaginal assisted radical laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer in the post-LACC trial era [10]. The role of hysterectomy in the management of obstetrical complications, especially in peripartum hemorrhage, has been reviewed by D. Tsolakidis et al. [11]. The broad spectrum of this special issue shows the relevance of hysterectomy in gynecological and obstetrical indications. Also, in modern gynecological surgery, hysterectomy plays a crucial role. But complete counseling of patients requires the consideration of all available hysterectomy approaches including vaginal, abdominal, laparoscopic, robotic, or combined techniques and the knowledge of uterus-sparing treatment alternatives. The aim of this special issue is to describe the significance of the uterus in a woman's life span and to highlight the actual trends in hysterectomy.
  11 in total

Review 1.  Uterine-sparing surgery for adenomyosis and/or adenomyoma.

Authors:  Huann-Cheng Horng; Ching-Hui Chen; Chih-Yao Chen; Kuan-Hao Tsui; Wei-Min Liu; Peng-Hui Wang; Wen-Hsun Chang; Ben-Shian Huang; Hsu-Dong Sun; Ting-Chang Chang; Wei-Chun Chang; Ming-Shyen Yen
Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.705

2.  Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy of a 7400 g Uterus.

Authors:  Megan Cesta; Bridget Kennedy; Resad Pasic
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 3.  Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Evelien M Sandberg; Andries R H Twijnstra; Sara R C Driessen; Frank Willem Jansen
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.137

4.  Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Danielle D Antosh; Cedric K Olivera; Shunaha Kim-Fine; Ethan M Balk; Miles Murphy; Cara L Grimes; Ambereen Sleemi; Ruchira Singh; Alexis A Dieter; Catrina C Crisp; David D Rahn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  Fertility-sparing surgery for uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Seiya Sato; Hiroaki Itamochi; Toru Sugiyama
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.404

6.  Reduced Complications Following Implementation of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Danish Population-based Cohort Study of Minimally Invasive Benign Gynecologic Surgery between 2004 and 2018.

Authors:  Annette Settnes; Märta Fink Topsoee; Charlotte Moeller; Margit Dueholm; Tine Iskov Kopp; Christina Norrbom; Steen Christian Rasmussen; Pia Arnum Froeslev; Annemette Joergensen; Eva Dreisler; Helga Gimbel
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.137

7.  B7-H4 Expression in Precancerous Lesions of the Uterine Cervix.

Authors:  Qianqian Zhang; Liju Zong; Hui Zhang; Wei Xie; Fan Yang; Wenwen Sun; Baoxia Cui; Youzhong Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Extravascular Dispersion of Polyvinyl Alcohol Microsphere Particles in Uterine Artery Embolization.

Authors:  L A Torres-de la Roche; C Cezar; S Hanif; R Devassy; H Krentel; J Hennefründ; R L De Wilde
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Current Role of Hysterectomy in Pelvic Floor Surgery: Time for Reappraisal? A Review of Current Literature and Expert Discussion.

Authors:  Guenter K Noé; Annelize Barnard; Sven Schiermeier; Michael Anapolski
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Pregnancy-Related Hysterectomy for Peripartum Hemorrhage: A Literature Narrative Review of the Diagnosis, Management, and Techniques.

Authors:  Dimitrios Tsolakidis; Dimitrios Zouzoulas; George Pados
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.