| Literature DB >> 27866212 |
Zhiwang Song1, Yun Lin1, Xiaojuan Ye1, Chan Feng1, Yonglin Lu1, Guang Yang1, Chunyan Dong1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND IL-1α and IL-6 are associated with the prognosis of a wide range of cancers, but their value in cervical cancer remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of IL-1α and IL-6 in cervical cancer and their significance in clinical prognosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS The expression of IL-1α and IL-6 in 105 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cervical cancer tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues was examined by immunohistochemistry. The results were semi-quantitatively scored and analyzed by chi-square test. Patient overall survival (OS) data was collected by follow-up and analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS The expression level of both IL-1α and IL-6 in cervical cancer tissue was higher than in adjacent non-tumor tissues (p<0.05). IL-1α expression was shown to be correlated with tumor size, FIGO histology grade, lymph node metastasis, stromal invasion, and tumor differentiation (p<0.05). IL-6 expression was shown to be correlated with tumor size, FIGO histology grade, and tumor differentiation (p<0.05). Patients with positive expression of IL-1α or IL-6 tended to have much shorter survival times than patients with negative expression. In addition, a multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that IL-1α expression and lymph node metastasis were independent predictors of OS in cervical cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS The expression of IL-1α was significantly associated with tumor size, FIGO histology grade, lymph node metastasis, stromal invasion, and tumor differentiation. The expression of IL-6 was significantly associated with tumor size, FIGO histology grade, and tumor differentiation. Positive IL-1α and IL-6 expression was significantly correlated with poor prognosis. They may be considered valuable biomarkers for prognosis and potential therapeutic targets for cervical cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27866212 PMCID: PMC5120643 DOI: 10.12659/msm.898569
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Expression of IL-1α in relation to pathologic and clinical variables.
| Clinicopathological parameters | N2 | IL-1α xpression | χ2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| + | − | ||||
| All | 105 | 67 | 38 | ||
| Age (years) | 1.148 | 0.284 | |||
| <50 | 57 | 39 | 18 | ||
| ≥50 | 48 | 28 | 20 | ||
| Tumor size | 6.024 | 0.014 | |||
| <4 cm | 58 | 31 | 27 | ||
| ≥4 cm | 47 | 36 | 11 | ||
| FIGO stage | 19.661 | <0.0001 | |||
| <II A | 50 | 21 | 29 | ||
| >II B | 55 | 46 | 9 | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | 5.135 | 0.023 | |||
| Absence | 81 | 47 | 34 | ||
| Presence | 24 | 20 | 4 | ||
| Stromal invasion | 5.399 | 0.020 | |||
| <2/3 depth | 74 | 42 | 32 | ||
| ≥2/3 depth | 31 | 25 | 6 | ||
| Tumor differentiation | 7.513 | 0.006 | |||
| Well + moderate | 56 | 29 | 27 | ||
| Poor | 49 | 38 | 11 | ||
Expression of IL-6 in relation to pathologic and clinical variables.
| Clinicopathological parameters | N2 | IL-6 xpression | χ2 | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| + | − | ||||
| All | 105 | 63 | 42 | ||
| Age (years) | 1.199 | 0.274 | |||
| <50 | 57 | 38 | 19 | ||
| ≥50 | 48 | 27 | 21 | ||
| Tumor size | 5.695 | 0.017 | |||
| <4c m | 58 | 30 | 28 | ||
| ≥4 cm | 47 | 35 | 12 | ||
| FIGO stage | 10.239 | 0.001 | |||
| <IIA | 50 | 23 | 27 | ||
| >IIB | 55 | 42 | 13 | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.005 | 0.945 | |||
| Absence | 81 | 50 | 31 | ||
| Presence | 24 | 15 | 9 | ||
| Stromal invasion | 2.817 | 0.093 | |||
| <2/3 depth | 74 | 42 | 32 | ||
| ≥2/3 depth | 31 | 23 | 8 | ||
| Tumor differentiation | 5.210 | 0.022 | |||
| Well + moderate | 56 | 29 | 27 | ||
| Poor | 49 | 36 | 13 | ||
Figure 1Immunohistochemistry analysis of IL-1α expression. (A) Positive expression of IL-1α in cervical cancer tissues. (B) Negative expression of IL-1α in normal tissues. Original magnification: ×200.
Figure 2Immunohistochemistry analysis of IL-6 expression. (A) Positive expression of IL-6 in cervical cancer tissues. (B) Negative expression of IL-6 in normal tissues. Original magnification: ×200.
Analysis of independent correlation factors of colorectal cancer prognosis with Cox multivariate regression analysis.
| Factors | B | S.E. | Ward | Sig. | Exp(B) | 95% CI for Exp(B) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||||
| IL-1α expression | −0.736 | 0.252 | 8.562 | 0.003 | 0.479 | 0.293 | 0.784 |
| Age | 0.109 | 0.241 | 0.205 | 0.651 | 1.115 | 0.695 | 1.791 |
| Tumor size | −0.265 | 0.227 | 1.364 | 0.243 | 0.768 | 0.492 | 1.197 |
| FIGO stage | −0.113 | 0.296 | 0.146 | 0.703 | 0.893 | 0.500 | 1.595 |
| Lymph node metastasis | −1.393 | 0.313 | 19.810 | <0.0001 | 0.248 | 0.134 | 0.459 |
| Stromal invasion | −0.604 | 0.344 | 3.074 | 0.080 | 0.547 | 0.279 | 1.074 |
| Tumor differentiation | −0.112 | 0.314 | 0.126 | 0.722 | 0.894 | 0.483 | 1.656 |
Analysis of independent correlation factors of colorectal cancer prognosis with Cox multivariate regression analysis.
| Factors | B | S.E. | Ward | Sig. | Exp(B) | 95% CI for Exp(B) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||||
| IL-6 expression | −0.401 | 0.237 | 2.868 | 0.090 | 0.670 | 0.421 | 1.065 |
| Age | 0.222 | 0.238 | 0.874 | 0.350 | 1.249 | 0.784 | 1.989 |
| Tumor size | −0.455 | 0.222 | 4.201 | 0.060 | 0.635 | 0.391 | 1.083 |
| FIGO stage | −0.181 | 0.299 | 0.364 | 0.546 | 0.835 | 0.464 | 1.501 |
| Lymph node metastasis | −1.531 | 0.328 | 21.784 | <0.0001 | 0.216 | 0.114 | 0.411 |
| Stromal invasion | −0.369 | 0.337 | 1.195 | 0.274 | 0.692 | 0.357 | 1.340 |
| Tumor differentiation | −0.181 | 0.302 | 0.359 | 0.549 | 0.835 | 0.462 | 1.508 |
Figure 3Kaplan-Meier survival curves stratified by IL-1α.
Figure 4Kaplan-Meier survival curves stratified by IL-6.