Omar Yusef Kudsi1,2, Andres Castellanos3, Srinivas Kaza4, Justin McCarty5, Eugene Dickens6, David Martin7, Frederick M Tiesenga8, Konstantinos Konstantinidis9, Petros Hirides9, Shilpa Mehendale10, Anthony Gonzalez11. 1. Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. omar.kudsi@tufts.edu. 2. , One Pearle Street, Suite 2000, Brockton, MA, 02301, USA. omar.kudsi@tufts.edu. 3. Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. JFK Medical Center, Lake Worth, FL, USA. 5. St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Hillcrest Medical Center, Tulsa, OK, USA. 7. Huntington Hospital, Pasadena, CA, USA. 8. West Suburban Medical Center, Oak Park, IL, USA. 9. Athens Medical Center, Athens, Greece. 10. Intuitive Surgical Clinical Affairs, Sunnyvale, CA, USA. 11. Baptist Hospital South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy evolved from the traditional multiport laparoscopic technique. Prior trials have demonstrated improved cosmesis with the single-incision technique. Robotic single-site surgery minimizes the technical difficulties associated with laparoscopic single-incision approach. This is the first prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing robotic single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC) and multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MPLC) in terms of cosmesis and patient satisfaction. METHODS:Patients with symptomatic benign gallbladder disease were randomized to RSSC or MPLC. Data included perioperative variables such as operative time, conversion and complications and cosmesis satisfaction, body image perception, quality of life using validated questionnaires, at postoperative visits of 2, 6 weeks and 3 months. RESULTS:One hundred thirty-six patients were randomized to RSSC (N = 83) and MPLC (N = 53) at 8 institutions. Both cohorts were dominated by higher enrollment of females (RSSC = 78%, MPLC = 92%). The RSSC and MPLC cohorts were otherwise statistically matched. Operative time was longer for RSSC (61 min vs. 44 min, P < 0.0001). There were no differences in complication rates. RSSC demonstrated a significant superiority in cosmesis satisfaction and body image perception (P value < 0.05 at every follow-up). There was no statistically significant difference in patient-reported quality of life. Multivariate analysis of female patients demonstrated significantly higher preference for RSSC over MPLC in cosmesis satisfaction and body image perception with no difference seen in overall quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this trial show that RSSC is associated with improved cosmesis satisfaction and body image perception without a difference in observed complication rate. The uncompromised safety and the improved cosmesis satisfaction and body image perception provided by RSSC for female patients support consideration of the robotic single-site approach. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01932216.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy evolved from the traditional multiport laparoscopic technique. Prior trials have demonstrated improved cosmesis with the single-incision technique. Robotic single-site surgery minimizes the technical difficulties associated with laparoscopic single-incision approach. This is the first prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing robotic single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC) and multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MPLC) in terms of cosmesis and patient satisfaction. METHODS:Patients with symptomatic benign gallbladder disease were randomized to RSSC or MPLC. Data included perioperative variables such as operative time, conversion and complications and cosmesis satisfaction, body image perception, quality of life using validated questionnaires, at postoperative visits of 2, 6 weeks and 3 months. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-six patients were randomized to RSSC (N = 83) and MPLC (N = 53) at 8 institutions. Both cohorts were dominated by higher enrollment of females (RSSC = 78%, MPLC = 92%). The RSSC and MPLC cohorts were otherwise statistically matched. Operative time was longer for RSSC (61 min vs. 44 min, P < 0.0001). There were no differences in complication rates. RSSC demonstrated a significant superiority in cosmesis satisfaction and body image perception (P value < 0.05 at every follow-up). There was no statistically significant difference in patient-reported quality of life. Multivariate analysis of female patients demonstrated significantly higher preference for RSSC over MPLC in cosmesis satisfaction and body image perception with no difference seen in overall quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this trial show that RSSC is associated with improved cosmesis satisfaction and body image perception without a difference in observed complication rate. The uncompromised safety and the improved cosmesis satisfaction and body image perception provided by RSSC for female patients support consideration of the robotic single-site approach. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01932216.
Authors: Steven E Hodgett; Jonathan M Hernandez; Connor A Morton; Sharona B Ross; Michael Albrink; Alexander S Rosemurgy Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-11-22 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Eric C H Lai; George P C Yang; Chung Ngai Tang; Patricia C L Yih; Oliver C Y Chan; Michael K W Li Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: S Trastulli; R Cirocchi; J Desiderio; S Guarino; A Santoro; A Parisi; G Noya; C Boselli Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2012-11-12 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Sigi Joseph; B Todd Moore; G Brent Sorensen; John W Earley; Fengming Tang; Phil Jones; Kimberly M Brown Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2011-04-13 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Oscar Vidal; Mauro Valentini; Juan J Espert; Cesar Ginesta; Jaime Jimeno; Alberto Martinez; Guerson Benarroch; Juan C Garcia-Valdecasas Journal: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 1.878
Authors: Ivy N Haskins; Andrew T Strong; Matthew T Allemang; Kalman P Bencsath; John H Rodriguez; Matthew D Kroh Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: S Cianci; A Rosati; V Rumolo; S Gueli Alletti; V Gallotta; L C Turco; G Corrado; G Vizzielli; A Fagotti; F Fanfani; G Scambia; S Uccella Journal: World J Surg Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Monika E Hagen; Alexandre Balaphas; Michele Podetta; Peter Rohner; Minoa K Jung; Nicolas C Buchs; Leo Buehler; Jona M Mendoza; Philippe Morel Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-10-19 Impact factor: 4.584