Literature DB >> 28733750

Magnetic surgery: first U.S. experience with a novel device.

Ivy N Haskins1, Andrew T Strong1, Matthew T Allemang1, Kalman P Bencsath1,2, John H Rodriguez1, Matthew D Kroh3,4,5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Magnet-assisted surgery is a new platform within minimally invasive surgery. The Levita™ Magnetic Surgical System, the first magnetic surgical system to receive Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, includes a deployable, magnetic grasper and an external magnet that is used to manipulate the grasper within the peritoneal cavity. This system is currently approved for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a body mass index (BMI) between 21 and 34 kg/m2. Herein, we detail the first United States experience with the Levita™ Magnetic Surgical System during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS: The Levita™ Magnetic Surgical System was used on consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our institution from June 2016 through November 2016. Only patients undergoing elective surgery and those with a body mass index (BMI) between 21 and 34 kg/m2 were included. Baseline patient characteristics, operative time, and perioperative details were collected.
RESULTS: A total of ten patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the Levita™ Magnetic Surgical System during the defined study period. The mean age at the time of surgery was 49.0 years and the average BMI of the cohort was 27.6 kg/m2. The average operative time was 64.4 min. There were no perioperative complications. Seven (70.0%) patients were discharged to home on the day of surgery, while the remaining three (30.0%) patients were discharged to home on postoperative day number one. Surgeons reported that the magnetic grasper was easy to use and provided adequate tissue retraction and exposure.
CONCLUSIONS: The Levita™ Magnetic Surgical System is safe and feasible to use in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Routine use of this system may facilitate a reduction in the total number of laparoscopic trocars used, leading to less tissue trauma and improved cosmesis. Additional studies are needed to determine the applicability and utility of this system for other general surgery cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feasibility; Magnetic surgery; Minimally invasive surgery; Safety

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28733750     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5762-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  17 in total

1.  Solo surgeon laparo-endoscopic single site nephrectomy facilitated by new generation magnetically anchored and guided systems camera.

Authors:  Sara L Best; Richard Bergs; Daniel J Scott; Raul Fernandez; Lauren B Mashaud; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Delayed assessment and eager adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: implications for developing surgical technologies.

Authors:  Alexander C Allori; I Michael Leitman; Elizabeth Heitman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  A prospective, randomized controlled trial of single-incision laparoscopic vs conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Jonathan T Carter; Jennifer A Kaplan; Jason N Nguyen; Matthew Y C Lin; Stanley J Rogers; Hobart W Harris
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 4.  Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

Review 5.  Evolution of laparoscopic surgery: lessons for NOTES.

Authors:  Yoav Mintz; Mark A Talamini; John Cullen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2008-04

Review 6.  Trocar-associated injuries and fatalities: an analysis of 1399 reports to the FDA.

Authors:  Janie Fuller; Binita S Ashar; Julia Carey-Corrado
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.137

7.  Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a safe and reproducible alternative.

Authors:  Oscar Vidal; Mauro Valentini; Juan J Espert; Cesar Ginesta; Jaime Jimeno; Alberto Martinez; Guerson Benarroch; Juan C Garcia-Valdecasas
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.878

8.  Novel magnetically guided intra-abdominal camera to facilitate laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: initial human experience.

Authors:  Jeffrey Cadeddu; Raul Fernandez; Mihir Desai; Richard Bergs; Chad Tracy; Shou-Jiang Tang; Prashanth Rao; Mahesh Desai; Daniel Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Safety Outcomes of NOTES Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Cheng Peng; Yan Ling; Chi Ma; Xiaochun Ma; Wei Fan; Weibo Niu; Jun Niu
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.719

10.  Magnetic Surgery: Results From First Prospective Clinical Trial in 50 Patients.

Authors:  Homero Rivas; Ignacio Robles; Francisco Riquelme; Marcelo Vivanco; Julio Jiménez; Boris Marinkovic; Mario Uribe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  4 in total

1.  Magnetic Liver Retraction: an Incision-Less Approach for Less Invasive Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Matthew Davis; Gerardo Davalos; Camila Ortega; Sugong Chen; Scott Schimpke; Kunoor Jain-Spangler; Jin Yoo; Keri Seymour; Ranjan Sudan; Dana Portenier; Alfredo D Guerron
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Magnetic Spiderman, a New Surgical Training Device: Study of Safety and Educational Value in a Liver Transplantation Surgical Training Program.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Huan Chen; Bo Tang; Tao Ma; Qingshan Li; Haoyang Zhu; Xiaogang Zhang; Yi Lv; Dinghui Dong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Magnetic-Assisted Robotic and Laparoscopic Renal Surgery: Initial Clinical Experience with the Levita Magnetic Surgical System.

Authors:  Juan Fulla; Alexander Small; Elie Kaplan-Marans; Michael Palese
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Magnetic Liver Retraction Decreases Postoperative Pain and Length of Stay in Bariatric Surgery Compared to Nathanson Device.

Authors:  Leonard K Welsh; Gerardo Davalos; Ramon Diaz; Andres Narvaez; Juan Esteban Perez; Melissa Castro; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Thomas Risoli; Dana Portenier; Alfredo D Guerron
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 1.878

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.