Literature DB >> 27861743

Sex differences in confidence influence patterns of conformity.

Catharine P Cross1,2, Gillian R Brown1, Thomas J H Morgan2,3, Kevin N Laland2.   

Abstract

Lack of confidence in one's own ability can increase the likelihood of relying on social information. Sex differences in confidence have been extensively investigated in cognitive tasks, but implications for conformity have not been directly tested. Here, we tested the hypothesis that, in a task that shows sex differences in confidence, an indirect effect of sex on social information use will also be evident. Participants (N = 168) were administered a mental rotation (MR) task or a letter transformation (LT) task. After providing an answer, participants reported their confidence before seeing the responses of demonstrators and being allowed to change their initial answer. In the MR, but not the LT, task, women showed lower levels of confidence than men, and confidence mediated an indirect effect of sex on the likelihood of switching answers. These results provide novel, experimental evidence that confidence is a general explanatory mechanism underpinning susceptibility to social influences. Our results have implications for the interpretation of the wider literature on sex differences in conformity.
© 2016 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gender; gender stereotype; letter transformation; mental rotation; social learning; stereotype threat

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27861743     DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  9 in total

1.  Behavioural homogenization with spillovers in a normative domain.

Authors:  Charles Efferson; Sonja Vogt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sex differences in the use of social information emerge under conditions of risk.

Authors:  Charlotte O Brand; Gillian R Brown; Catharine P Cross
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Evidence for a sex effect during overimitation: boys copy irrelevant modelled actions more than girls across cultures.

Authors:  Aurélien Frick; Fabrice Clément; Thibaud Gruber
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Norm compliance affects perceptual decisions through modulation of a starting point bias.

Authors:  Ulf Toelch; Folco Panizza; Hauke R Heekeren
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  The development of human social learning across seven societies.

Authors:  Edwin J C van Leeuwen; Emma Cohen; Emma Collier-Baker; Christian J Rapold; Marie Schäfer; Sebastian Schütte; Daniel B M Haun
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Attachment, Bushfire Preparedness, Planning, and Response among Animal Guardians: A South Australian Case Study.

Authors:  Lisel O'Dwyer; Kirrilly Thompson
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2018-08-02

7.  Gender Differences in the Interest in Mathematics Schoolwork Across 50 Countries.

Authors:  Kimmo Eriksson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-25

8.  Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning.

Authors:  Sally E Street; Thomas J H Morgan; Alex Thornton; Gillian R Brown; Kevin N Laland; Catharine P Cross
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Social information use in adolescents: The impact of adults, peers and household composition.

Authors:  Lucas Molleman; Patricia Kanngiesser; Wouter van den Bos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.