Literature DB >> 29794048

Behavioural homogenization with spillovers in a normative domain.

Charles Efferson1,2,3, Sonja Vogt4,5,3.   

Abstract

The importance of culture for human social evolution hinges largely on the extent to which culture supports outcomes that would not otherwise occur. An especially controversial claim is that social learning leads groups to coalesce around group-typical behaviours and associated social norms that spill over to shape choices in asocial settings. To test this, we conducted an experiment with 878 groups of participants in 116 communities in Sudan. Participants watched a short film and evaluated the appropriate way to behave in the situation dramatized in the film. Each session consisted of an asocial condition in which participants provided private evaluations and a social condition in which they provided public evaluations. Public evaluations allowed for social learning. Across sessions, we randomized the order of the two conditions. Public choices dramatically increased the homogeneity of normative evaluations. When the social condition was first, this homogenizing effect spilled over to subsequent asocial conditions. The asocial condition when first was thus alone in producing distinctly heterogeneous groups. Altogether, information about the choices of others led participants to converge rapidly on similar normative evaluations that continued to hold sway in subsequent asocial settings. These spillovers were at least partly owing to the combined effects of conformity and self-consistency. Conformity dominated self-consistency when the two mechanisms were in conflict, but self-consistency otherwise produced choices that persisted through time. Additionally, the tendency to conform was heterogeneous. Females conformed more than males, and conformity increased with the number of other people a decision-maker observed before making her own choice.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavioural experiments; endogenous preferences; gene-culture coevolution; social norms

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29794048      PMCID: PMC5998100          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  27 in total

1.  Controversies in the evolutionary social sciences: a guide for the perplexed.

Authors:  E A. Smith; M B. Mulder; K Hill
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 2.  Culture-gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality.

Authors:  Maciej Chudek; Joseph Henrich
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence.

Authors:  Peter Richerson; Ryan Baldini; Adrian V Bell; Kathryn Demps; Karl Frost; Vicken Hillis; Sarah Mathew; Emily K Newton; Nicole Naar; Lesley Newson; Cody Ross; Paul E Smaldino; Timothy M Waring; Matthew Zefferman
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  Collective action and the evolution of social norm internalization.

Authors:  Sergey Gavrilets; Peter J Richerson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Game theory and human evolution: a critique of some recent interpretations of experimental games.

Authors:  Edward H Hagen; Peter Hammerstein
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Sex differences in confidence influence patterns of conformity.

Authors:  Catharine P Cross; Gillian R Brown; Thomas J H Morgan; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2016-11-11

Review 7.  The Evolution of Individual and Cultural Variation in Social Learning.

Authors:  Alex Mesoudi; Lei Chang; Sasha R X Dall; Alex Thornton
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Consistent individual differences in human social learning strategies.

Authors:  Lucas Molleman; Pieter van den Berg; Franz J Weissing
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  The biological bases of conformity.

Authors:  T J H Morgan; K N Laland
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Sex differences in the use of social information emerge under conditions of risk.

Authors:  Charlotte O Brand; Gillian R Brown; Catharine P Cross
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  3 in total

1.  The promise and the peril of using social influence to reverse harmful traditions.

Authors:  Charles Efferson; Sonja Vogt; Ernst Fehr
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-12-02

2.  Gender Differences in the Interest in Mathematics Schoolwork Across 50 Countries.

Authors:  Kimmo Eriksson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-25

3.  Source-sink behavioural dynamics limit institutional evolution in a group-structured society.

Authors:  Laurent Hébert-Dufresne; Timothy M Waring; Guillaume St-Onge; Meredith T Niles; Laura Kati Corlew; Matthew P Dube; Stephanie J Miller; Nicholas J Gotelli; Brian J McGill
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.963

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.