| Literature DB >> 27861621 |
Takumi Tochio1, Yasuyuki Kitaura2, Saki Nakamura1, Chie Sugawa1, Motoki Takahashi2, Akihito Endo3, Yoshiharu Shimomura2.
Abstract
Functional food ingredients, including prebiotics, have been ardently developed for improving the intestinal environment. Fructooligosaccarides (FOS), including fructans, are the well researched and commercialized prebiotics. However, to our knowledge, few studies have been conducted on the physiological effects of each component of FOS as prebiotics. 1-Kestose, a component of FOS, is composed of one glucose and two fructose molecules, and is considered as a key prebiotic component in short-chain FOS. In the present study, we examined the effects of dietary 1-kestose using 0.5-5% 1-kestose diets on cecal microbiota composition and cecal contents of short-chain fatty acids and lactate in rats. The findings indicate that dietary 1-kestose induced cecal hypertrophy and alterations in the cecal microbiota composition, including a marked increase in the cell number of Bifidobacterium spp. These alterations were associated with significant increases in acetate and lactate, and a marked increase in butyrate in cecal contents. Furthermore, dietary 1-kestose induced a significant decrease in serum insulin concentration in rats fed 2.5-5% 1-kestose diet. These findings suggest a potential of 1-kestose to be a prebiotic for improving the metabolism of the host.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27861621 PMCID: PMC5115820 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166850
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Experimental diets.
| Ingredient | Control diet (0% 1-kestose) | 1-Kestose diet (% 1-kestose) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5% | 1% | 2.5% | 5% | ||
| (g/100 g diet) | |||||
| 51.9486 | 51.9486 | 51.9486 | 51.9486 | 51.9486 | |
| 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
| 10.0 | 9.5 | 9.0 | 7.5 | 5.0 | |
| 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | |
| 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | |
| 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | |
| 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | |
| 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
| 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |
| 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | |
| 0.0014 | 0.0014 | 0.0014 | 0.0014 | 0.0014 | |
| 0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 5.0 | |
| 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |
Primers and program conditions for real-time PCR.
| Target | Primer name | Oligonucleotide sequence | PCR program |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteroides genus | HuBac594Bhqf (modified) | 95°C (5 sec)– 60°C (30 sec) / 35 cycles | |
| HuBac692r | |||
| Bifidobacterium genus | Bif LM 26F | 95°C (5 sec)–60°C (20 sec)-72°C (20 sec) / 35 cycles | |
| Bif 228R | |||
| Clostridium cluster XIVa | CXIV-F1 | 95°C (5 sec)-52°C (20 sec)-72°C (20 sec) / 35 cycles | |
| CXIV-R2 | |||
| Lactobacillus genus | LactoR’F | 95°C (5 sec) - 56°C (20 sec)-72°C (50 sec) / 35 cycles | |
| LBFR | |||
| A. muciniphila | Akk-F | 95°C (5 sec)-57°C (30 sec)-72°C (60 sec) / 35 cycles | |
| Akk-R |
Body weight and food intake.
| Control group | 0.5% group | 1% group | 2.5% group | 5% group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 481 ± 9 | 465 ± 11 | 489 ± 15 | 477 ± 11 | 460 ± 8 | |
| 25.2 ± 0.5 | 24.6 ± 0.6 | 25.8 ± 0.9 | 25.5 ± 0.9 | 25.1 ± 0.5 |
Values represent the means ± SE, n = 8. Food intake is the average of 4 weeks of the experimental period.
Weights of the cecum and cecal contents.
| Control group | 0.5% group | 1% group | 2.5% group | 5% group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wet weight (g) | |||||
| 0.64 ± 0.03 | 0.74 ± 0.02 | 0.77 ± 0.03 | 0.90 ± 0.03 | 1.02 ± 0.04 | |
| 3.83 ± 0.67 | 3.71 ± 0.32 | 3.49 ± 0.24 | 3.81 ± 0.27 | 5.73 ± 0.58 | |
Values represent the means ± SE, n = 8.
* Significant difference compared to the control group (P < 0.05).
Fig 1(a)-(e). Photographs of the cecum with cecal contents in rats. The cecum from each group of rats: (a) control, (b) 0.5%, (c) 1%, (d) 2.5%, (e) 5%. Bars: 2 cm.
Levels of bacterial cell numbers (log10 cells/g) in cecal contents.
| Bacterial group | Control group | 0.5% group | 1% group | 2.5% group | 5% group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.64 | 8.98 | 9.10 | 9.34 | 9.05 | |
| (8.35–8.83) | (8.76–9.30) | (8.91–9.50) | (9.00–9.73) | (8.90–9.28) | |
| 7.05 | 8.86 | 8.94 | 9.95 | 10.91 | |
| (6.99–7.18) | (8.77–8.89) | (8.86–9.09) | (9.09–10.51) | (10.73–10.93) | |
| 9.74 | 11.28 | 11.70 | 11.74 | 10.4 | |
| (9.52–9.81) | (11.21–11.44) | (11.39–11.80) | (11.73–11.80) | (10.26–10.50) | |
| 8.78 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | 8.89 | |
| (8.55–8.92) | (8.75–9.06) | ||||
| 8.93 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | 8.87 | |
| (8.77–9.23) | (8.58–9.24) |
Results are represented as the log10 of copy number of 16S rDNA per gram of cecal contents.
IQR in parentheses indicates the interquartile range.
*Significant difference compared to control group (P < 0.05).
N.D. represents not determined.
Fig 2Measurement of SCFAs in cecal contents.
Values represent the means ± SE (n = 8), * P <0.05 vs. control group.
Concentrations of isobutyrate, isovalerate, and valerate in cecal contents.
| Component | Control group | 0.5% group | 1% group | 2.5% group | 5% group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cecal content (μmol/g) | |||||
| 0.93 ± 0.06 | 0.73 ± 0.03 | 0.50 ± 0.05 | 0.33 ± 0.05 | 0.42 ± 0.05 | |
| 0.55 ± 0.08 | 0.36 ± 0.03 | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.35 ± 0.02 | |
| 0.91 ± 0.08 | 0.78 ± 0.07 | 0.69 ± 0.08 | 0.56 ± 0.07 | 0.48 ± 0.06 | |
Values represent the means ± SE, n = 8
* Significant difference compared to control group (P < 0.05).
Concentrations of total cholesterol, triglyceride, glucose, and insulin.
| Control group | 0.5% group | 1% group | 2.5% group | 5% group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102 ± 4 | 99 ± 3 | 94 ± 6 | 90 ± 6 | 82 ± 6 | |
| 277 ± 17 | 291 ± 24 | 270 ± 20 | 283 ± 20 | 247 ± 24 | |
| 207 ± 11 | 202 ± 10 | 192 ± 11 | 202 ± 4 | 188 ± 7 | |
| 4.34 ± 0.51 | 3.04 ± 0.38 | 3.08 ± 0.31 | 2.56 ± 0.31 | 2.01 ± 0.24 |
Values represent the means ± SE, n = 8.
* Significant difference compared to the control group (P < 0.05).