Literature DB >> 27853712

Influence of Incubation Conditions on Biofilm Formation by Pseudomonas Fluorescens Isolated from Dairy Products and Dairy Manufacturing Plants.

Chiara Rossi1, Clemencia Chaves-López1, Annalisa Serio1, Elisa Goffredo2, Beniamino Terzo Cenci Goga3, Antonello Paparella1.   

Abstract

In this study, biofilm formation of 64 Pseudomonas fluorescens strains isolated from milk, dairy products and dairy plants was compared. The strains were grown on Tryptic Soy Broth supplemented with 0.2% of glucose, on polystyrene microplates at 10 and 30°C for 48 h. In general, 57/64 P. fluorescens strains formed biofilm, although with great variability at both tested temperatures. Moreover, our results evidenced that the biofilm-forming ability of the strains was temperature- and strain-dependent. Interestingly, the ability of several isolates to form biofilms was associated with the low temperature after 48 h. Our findings evidenced that temperature was more important than incubation time for biofilm formation. Considering the origin of the strains, it is relevant to underline the importance of performing accurate cleaning and disinfection procedures on food processing surfaces.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilm; Mozzarella cheese; Pseudomonas fluorescens; Dairy products

Year:  2016        PMID: 27853712      PMCID: PMC5090116          DOI: 10.4081/ijfs.2016.5793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ital J Food Saf        ISSN: 2239-7132


Introduction

The genus Pseudomonas is a heterogeneous group of microorganisms, belonging to the Pseudomonadaceae family, which includes ubiquitous Gram negative, aerobic, non-fermentative, catalase and oxidase positive, mesophilic and psychrotolerant, non-spore forming rods (Caldera et al., 2016). Pseudomonas members are adapted to a wide range of conditions and can be found in many different environments such as soil, water, plants, animal tissues, and foods (Franzetti and Scarpellini, 2007). In addition, they possess iron-uptake systems based on syderophores and therefore can make iron unavailable for other microorganisms (Caixeta et al., 2012). Pseudomonas species can produce different pigments such as pyoverdin, pyocyanin (Carrascosa et al., 2015), and indigoidine (Caputo et al., 2015). In particular, P. fluorescens induces changes in structure and colour of food products, due to production of lecithinase (phospholipase C), proteolytic enzymes, and pigmented molecules. Moreover, pigment-producing Pseudomonas grows rapidly at low temperatures and produces exopolysaccharides, which contribute to biofilm formation (Caixeta et al., 2012). In food environments, biofilms become reservoirs of pigment-producing Pseudomonas, and can enhance their resistance to several environmental stresses that are commonly encountered in food processing (e.g. refrigeration, acidity, salinity, disinfection) (Giaouris et al., 2014; Wang and Jayarao, 2001). Furthermore, biofilms are extremely difficult to remove and control, and therefore cause enormous problems with possible production and plant shutdowns that cost millions in lost revenue (Cloete et al., 2009). Some species of the Pseudomonas genus can grow during refrigerated storage of raw milk in both farms and dairy plants (De Jonghe et al., 2011) and are considered important milk spoilage organisms. In fact, they produce many thermotolerant lipolytic and proteolytic enzymes that affect the quality and shelf life of processed milk (Dogan and Boor, 2003). By the same token, due to the their ability to form biofilms, they can also contaminate previously processed milk (Kives et al., 2006). In addition, biofilm detachment during processing can contribute to the contamination of the finished product (Cleto et al., 2012), and post-processing contamination can cause cheese spoilage and shelf life reduction (Segat et al., 2014). In fact, some authors reported that Pseudomonas grown on the cheese surface mostly derives from water (Cantoni et al., 2003; Leriche et al., 2004) but also from food contact surfaces and piping of the processing lines (Sharma and Anand, 2002). Dairy products can be considered important sources of strains with different physiological characteristics that might behave differently with regard to biofilm formation. Thus, given the great interest in the genus Pseudomonas in the dairy industry, the aim of this study was to characterise the Pseudomonas fluorescens strains on the basis of the capability to form biofilm on polystyrene surface and the influence of the temperature and time incubation on biofilm formation.

Materials and Methods

Microbial strains and growth conditions

The bacteria used in this study were 64 Pseudomonas fluorescens strains isolated from milk, dairy products and dairy plants. The strains were maintained at -80°C in cryovials, containing an anti-freezing agent (glycerol, 20% v/v; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) to preserve the viability of the cells during storage. The origin of the strains is reported in Table 1. Before the evaluation of the biofilm formation, bacterial strains were grown overnight in Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB; Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK), at 30°C under aerobic conditions. After 24 h of incubation, 1 mL of bacterial suspension was inoculated into fresh TSB supplemented with 0.2% of glucose, and incubated at 30°C for 18 h to obtain a working fresh culture. Bacteria were harvested by centrifugation at 13,000 g (Eppendorf Centrifuge 5415D; Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) for 5 min at 4°C and washed for three times with Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS) 50 mM pH 7.0, according to Mazzarrino et al. (2015). Inocula were standardised at about 5×105 cells/mL, by means of absorbance measures at 590 nm (Lambda Bio 20; Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Inocula were confirmed by plate counts on Pseudomonas Agar Base supplemented with Pseudomonas CFC supplement (PSA; Oxoid), incubated at 30°C for 24 h.
Table 1.

Number of Pseudomonas fluorescens strains and their origins.

OriginsP. fluorescens strains (n)
Mozzarella cheese46
Milk5
Scamorza4
Brine3
Cheese1
Curd1
Butter1
Burrata1
Mozzarella manufacturing plant1
Ice machine1

P. fluorescens, Pseudomonas fluorescens.

Biofilm formation

Biofilm-forming ability of P. fluorescens was measured in 96-well polystyrene microplates. Each strain was tested in 5 replicates after inoculation of a standardised culture in TSB added with 0.2% of glucose. Negative control wells contained non-inoculated TSB with glucose. Samples (200 µL) were dispensed into wells, and the microplates were incubated at 10 and 30°C for 24 and 48 h.

Biofilm assay

The planktonic cells were removed from each well, and the plates were rinsed three times with deionised water. Excess moisture was removed by tapping the microplates on sterile napkins, and the plates were dried for 15 min. Then, biofilm formation was quantified by crystal violet assay, as reported by Sabaeifard et al. (2014), with some modifications. In detail, the wells were stained with 200 µL of 0.1% crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich) solution at room temperature for 30 min, and then the microplates were washed with deionised water to remove the stain. After drying, crystal violet was solubilised in 250 µL of 30% acetic acid glacial (Carlo Erba Reagenti SpA, Milan, Italy). Five absorbance values obtained for each strain were used to calculate means and standard deviations, by subtracting the value of control from each mean value. The absorbance at 590 nm [optical density (OD)590] was measured, and the strains were grouped into: OD590<0.1, non-producers (NP); OD590=0.1-1.0, weak producers (WP); OD590=1.1-3.0, moderate producers (MP); and OD590>3.0, strong producers (SP).

Statistical analysis

Means and standard deviations were calculated for the five replicates of OD590 measures and the means were compared by Student’s t-test, fixing P<0.05.

Results

In the microplates used to evaluate biofilm-forming ability, a greater biofilm formation was observable by the naked eye after staining at the interface between the air and the liquid medium (at the upper limit of the 200 µL), probably because of oxygen availability. The comparison of the biofilm-forming capability of individual strains, classified on the basis of OD, is shown in Figure 1. The standard deviation of values obtained for each individual strain was lower than 1%. In general, a great variability in biofilm-forming ability, in terms of OD values, was observed among the different Pseudomonas fluoresces strains.
Figure 1.

Biofilm formed by the 64 Pseudomonas fluorescens strains at different incubation times and temperatures. White, non-producers (NP); light grey, weak producers (WP); dark grey, moderate producers (MP); black, strong producers (SP).

Although low temperature (10°C) contributed significantly to the biofilm formation more than high temperature (30°C), the latter promoted a stronger biofilm formation without significant differences (P>0.05) depending on incubation time. On the contrary, significant differences (P<0.05) were observed in the numbers of biofilm producers and in their total biofilm biomass (expressed as OD590) at 10°C. In particular, during the first 24 h, 54/64 strains produced biofilm at 10°C and 51/64 at 30°C, whereas after 48 h the number of biofilm-producer strains increased up to 57/64 at 10°C but decreased to 47 strains at 30°C. As regards the level of biofilm formation, after 24 h no strain formed a strong biofilm at 10°C, while eleven strains produced a strong biofilm at 30°C; however, after 48 h the number of the strong biofilm producers increased at both incubation temperatures. Thus, it seems that during the first 24 h, temperature was more important than incubation time, for adhesion of P. fluorescens to the surface. Table 2 shows the number of P. fluorescens strains that were able to form biofilm after 48 h of incubation, listed according to strain of origin. In this study, although it was not possible to correlate the origin of the strains with their ability to produce biofilm, a strong biofilm-forming capacity was observed in several strains isolated from mozzarella cheese samples, with 10 and 13 SP strains at 10 and 30°C, respectively.
Table 2.

Number of Pseudomonas fluorescens strains capable of producing biofilm after 48 h of incubation.

OriginsTotal strains (n)10°C30°C
NPWPMPSPNPWPMPSP
Mozzarella cheese4641715101218313
Milk504102120
Scamorza400401120
Brine310201110
Cheese110000010
Curd101000100
Butter100100100
Burrata110000100
Mozzarella manufacturing plant100101000
Ice machine100100100

NP, non-producers; WP, weak producers; MP, moderate producers; SP, strong producers.

Discussion

The ability to adhere to solid surfaces and the consecutive formation of an organised bacterial biofilm community are important steps in the establishment of Pseudomonas spp. in dairy manufacturing plants. In addition, it is well known that the switch from planktonic to a biofilm mode of growth is an intricate process, which occurs in response to changes in environmental conditions (O’Toole et al., 2000). In this study, we observed that the majority of strains of P. fluorescens isolated from dairy products and dairy manufacturing plants was able to form biofilm in microtiter plate wells, with variations related to the biodiversity of strains. As the first step of biofilm formation is bacterial adhesion to surfaces, we can hypothesise that the strains showed a good ability to create hydrophobic interactions with polystyrene surfaces. However, Lemos et al. (2014) suggested that surface physical and chemical properties are not the main factor regulating the initial adhesion process for P. fluorescens. In this work, we observed that biofilm formation in P. fluorescens strains was promoted at 10°C: generally strains not able to produce biofilm at 30°C were instead weak or particularly moderate producers at 10°C. It is accepted that biofilm formation is enhanced by cell motility, particularly when it is mediated by flagella, and under certain environmental conditions flagella are necessary for biofilm formation in P. fluorescens (Robleto et al., 2003). Thus, we can hypothesise that the biofilm-forming ability of the strains here studied could be due to bacterial surface appendages that can be temperature-dependent as in L. monocytogenes. In this respect, integration of many diverse signals from the environment might play a role in biofilm formation, together with other events such as phenotypic and genetic switching during biofilm production and release of extracellular polymeric substances (Simões et al., 2010). On the other hand, the rapid decrease of biofilm-forming capacity that we observed at 30°C after 48 h of incubation could be attributed to the loss of exopolymers from the biofilm and in particular of exopolysaccharides, which may suggest that an active process of detachment was occurring, probably mediated by enzymatic degradation (Allison et al., 1998).

Conclusions

In conclusion, we observed that the biofilm-forming ability of P. fluorescens strains was temperature- and strain-dependent. In general, lower incubation temperatures (+10°C) favoured the formation of biofilm after 48 h, probably because the strains were well adapted to the low temperatures applied both in production environment and in storage conditions. Further studies are necessary to assay the adhesive strength of P. fluorescens on other materials such as stainless steel, in order to highlight the conditions that affect the biofilm-forming ability of P. fluorescens in the dairy industry.
  13 in total

Review 1.  Biofilm formation as microbial development.

Authors:  G O'Toole; H B Kaplan; R Kolter
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 15.500

2.  Alteration of raw-milk cheese by Pseudomonas spp.: monitoring the sources of contamination using fluorescence spectroscopy and metabolic profiling.

Authors:  Françoise Leriche; Amélie Bordessoules; Karine Fayolle; Romdhane Karoui; Karine Laval; Ludovic Leblanc; Eric Dufour
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  Polysaccharide differences between planktonic and biofilm-associated EPS from Pseudomonas fluorescens B52.

Authors:  Juliana Kives; Belén Orgaz; Carmen Sanjosé
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2006-05-07       Impact factor: 5.268

Review 4.  Attachment and biofilm formation by foodborne bacteria in meat processing environments: causes, implications, role of bacterial interactions and control by alternative novel methods.

Authors:  Efstathios Giaouris; Even Heir; Michel Hébraud; Nikos Chorianopoulos; Solveig Langsrud; Trond Møretrø; Olivier Habimana; Mickaël Desvaux; Sandra Renier; George-John Nychas
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Pseudomonas fluorescens isolated from bulk tank milk.

Authors:  L Wang; B M Jayarao
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Influence of storage conditions on the growth of Pseudomonas species in refrigerated raw milk.

Authors:  Valerie De Jonghe; An Coorevits; Koenraad Van Hoorde; Winy Messens; Anita Van Landschoot; Paul De Vos; Marc Heyndrickx
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Optimization of tetrazolium salt assay for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm using microtiter plate method.

Authors:  Parastoo Sabaeifard; Ahya Abdi-Ali; Mohammad Reza Soudi; Rasoul Dinarvand
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.363

8.  Genetic analysis of the AdnA regulon in Pseudomonas fluorescens: nonessential role of flagella in adhesion to sand and biofilm formation.

Authors:  Eduardo A Robleto; Inmaculada López-Hernández; Mark W Silby; Stuart B Levy
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Genetic diversity and spoilage potentials among Pseudomonas spp. isolated from fluid milk products and dairy processing plants.

Authors:  Belgin Dogan; Kathryn J Boor
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Characterization of contaminants from a sanitized milk processing plant.

Authors:  Sara Cleto; Sónia Matos; Leon Kluskens; Maria João Vieira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Characterization of biofilm production by Pseudomonas fluorescens isolated from refrigerated raw buffalo milk.

Authors:  Karine Lauer Cruz; Amanda de Souza da Motta
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Effect of gaseous ozone treatment on biofilm of dairy-isolated Pseudomonas spp. strains.

Authors:  Felice Panebianco; Selene Rubiola; Francesco Chiesa; Tiziana Civera; Pierluigi Aldo Di Ciccio
Journal:  Ital J Food Saf       Date:  2022-06-29

3.  Interactions between L. monocytogenes and P. fluorescens in Dual-Species Biofilms under Simulated Dairy Processing Conditions.

Authors:  Francesca Maggio; Chiara Rossi; Clemencia Chaves-López; Annalisa Serio; Luca Valbonetti; Francesco Pomilio; Alessio Pio Chiavaroli; Antonello Paparella
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-01-16

4.  Effect of Delayed Refrigeration on the Microbial Carcass Contamination of Wild Boars (Sus scrofa).

Authors:  Beniamino Cenci-Goga; Alberto Amicabile; Musafiri Karama; Saeed El-Ashram; Cristina Saraiva; Juan García-Díez; Simone Finotti; Viviana Genna; Giampaolo Moretti; Riccardo Murari; Riccardo Muliari; Sabrina Bonizzato; Erica Lugoboni; Sabina Cassini; Caterina Dal-Ben; Luca Grispoldi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  Recent Advances in the Mechanisms and Regulation of QS in Dairy Spoilage by Pseudomonas spp.

Authors:  Laura Quintieri; Leonardo Caputo; Milena Brasca; Francesca Fanelli
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-12-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.