Literature DB >> 25190726

Adult cancer clinical trials that fail to complete: an epidemic?

Kristian D Stensland1, Russell B McBride1, Asma Latif1, Juan Wisnivesky1, Ryan Hendricks1, Nitin Roper1, Paolo Boffetta1, Simon J Hall1, William K Oh1, Matthew D Galsky2.   

Abstract

The number and diversity of cancer therapeutics in the pipeline has increased over the past decade due to an enhanced understanding of cancer biology and the identification of novel therapeutic targets. At the same time, the cost of bringing new drugs to market and the regulatory burdens associated with clinical drug development have progressively increased. The finite number of eligible patients and limited financial resources available to evaluate promising new therapeutics represent rate-limiting factors in the effort to translate preclinical discoveries into the next generation of standard therapeutic approaches. Optimal use of resources requires understanding and ultimately addressing inefficiencies in the cancer clinical trials system. Prior analyses have demonstrated that a large proportion of trials initiated by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cooperative Group system are never completed. While NCI Cooperative Group trials are important, they represent only a small proportion of all cancer clinical trials performed. Herein, we explore the problem of cancer clinical trials that fail to complete within the broader cancer clinical trials enterprise. Among 7776 phase II-III adult cancer clinical trials initiated between 2005-2011, we found a seven-year cumulative incidence of failure to complete of approximately 20% (95% confidence interval = 18% to 22%). Nearly 48000 patients were enrolled in trials that failed to complete. These trials likely contribute little to the scientific knowledge base, divert resources and patients from answering other critical questions, and represent a barrier to progress.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25190726     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  38 in total

1.  Predicting Low Accrual in the National Cancer Institute's Cooperative Group Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Caroline S Bennette; Scott D Ramsey; Cara L McDermott; Josh J Carlson; Anirban Basu; David L Veenstra
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Editorial Comment: Industry Payments to Urologists in 2014: an Analysis of the Open Payments Program.

Authors:  Jathin Bandari; Bruce L Jacobs
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2017-07

3.  Premature Clinical Trial Discontinuation in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Authors:  Monica Khunger; Sagar Rakshit; Adrian V Hernandez; Vinay Pasupuleti; Kate Glass; Matthew D Galsky; Petros Grivas
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-08-01

Review 4.  Challenges Facing Early Phase Trials Sponsored by the National Cancer Institute: An Analysis of Corrective Action Plans to Improve Accrual.

Authors:  Holly A Massett; Grace Mishkin; Larry Rubinstein; S Percy Ivy; Andrea Denicoff; Elizabeth Godwin; Kate DiPiazza; Jennifer Bolognese; James A Zwiebel; Jeffrey S Abrams
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Association of Industry Sponsorship With Cancer Clinical Trial Accrual.

Authors:  Dario Pasalic; Chad Tang; Reshma Jagsi; C David Fuller; Albert C Koong; Ethan B Ludmir
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 31.777

6.  Clinical Trial Characteristics and Barriers to Participant Accrual: The MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience over 30 years, a Historical Foundation for Trial Improvement.

Authors:  Chad Tang; Steven I Sherman; Mellanie Price; Jun Weng; Suzanne E Davis; David S Hong; James C Yao; Aman Buzdar; George Wilding; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Modifying the Clinical Research Infrastructure at a Dedicated Clinical Trials Unit: Assessment of Trial Development, Activation, and Participant Accrual.

Authors:  Chad Tang; Kenneth R Hess; Dwana Sanders; Suzanne E Davis; Aman U Buzdar; Razelle Kurzrock; J Jack Lee; Funda Meric-Bernstam; David S Hong
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Behavioral Nudges to Improve Enrollment in Critical Care Trials.

Authors:  Dustin C Krutsinger; Kelly L O'Leary; Susan S Ellenberg; Cody E Cotner; Scott D Halpern; Katherine R Courtright
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2020-09

9.  Evaluating the decisions of glioma patients regarding clinical trial participation: a retrospective single provider review.

Authors:  Grant W Jirka; Karl Stessy M Bisselou; Lynette M Smith; Nicole Shonka
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  The Influence of Patient Identification and Narrative Transportation on Intentions to Participate in Cancer Research.

Authors:  Jordan M Neil; Aisling Gough; Frank Kee; Thomas J George; Jeffrey Pufahl; Janice L Krieger
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.