| Literature DB >> 27851803 |
Dong Xu1, Yong Hou1, Yuanfang Zheng1, Yue Zheng1, Mengtao Li1, Xiaofeng Zeng1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of the 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for systemic sclerosis (SSc) in clinical practice in a Chinese patient cohort, and to compare outcomes with the 1980 ACR criteria.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27851803 PMCID: PMC5112860 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166629
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Disease spectrum of other connective tissue diseases used as controls.
| Cases (%) | RP Cases | |
|---|---|---|
| SLE | 45 (51.7) | 32 |
| Polymyositis /Dermatomyositis | 14 (16.1) | 2 |
| MCTD | 9 (10.3) | 9 |
| UCTD | 6 (6.9) | 5 |
| Systemic vasculitis | 5 (5.7) | 1 |
| Primary Sjögren’s syndrome | 5 (5.7%) | 2 |
| Fasciitis | 2(2.3%) | 0 |
| Localized scleroderma | 1(1.1%) | 0 |
| Total | 87 | 51 (58.6%) |
SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; MCTD, Mixed connective tissue disease; UCTD, undifferentiated connective tissue disease; RP,Raynaud’s phenomenon.
The demagraphic and clinical features of SSc patients and disease controls.
| SSc patients (n = 143) | Disease controls (n = 87) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 46.92 ± 11.74 | 38.72 ± 11.91 | <0.001 |
| Gender (F/M) | 133/10 | 73/14 | 0.029 |
| RP | 137 (95.8%) | 52 (59.8%) | <0.001 |
| Puffy fingers | 68 (47.6%) | 18 (20.7%) | <0.001 |
| Sclerodactyly | 111 (77.6%) | 2 (2.3%) | <0.001 |
| Digital ulcers | 37 (25.9%) | 4 (4.6%) | <0.001 |
| Pitting scars | 21 (14.7%) | 2 (2.3%) | 0.002 |
| Telangiectasias | 52 (36.4%) | 2 (2.3%) | <0.001 |
| PAH | 22/132 (16.7%) | 13 (14.9%) | 0.135 |
| ILD | 104 (72.7%) | 25 (28.7%) | <0.001 |
| ACA | 23 (16.1%) | 6 (6.9%) | 0.042 |
| Anti-Scl70 antibody | 57 (39.3%) | 3 (3.4%) | <0.001 |
| Anti-polymerase III antibody | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 1.000 |
RP, Raynaud’s phenomenon; PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension; ILD, interstitial lung disease; ACA, anticentromere antibody.
Sensitivity and specificity of 1980 ACR and 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria in different countries.
| Patient numbers | 1980 ACR | 2013 ACR/EULAR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSc | Control | Sensitivity | Specificity | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
| ACR/EULAR (13 centers in North America, 10 centers in Europe) | ||||||
| Derivation sample [ | 100 | 100 | 81 | 77 | 95 | 93 |
| Validation sample [ | 268 | 137 | 75 | 72 | 91 | 92 |
| Turkey (3 centers) [ | 131 | 103 | 85.3 | 100 | 94.4 | 98.1 |
| Canada (15 centers) [ | 724 | 88.3 | 98.3 | |||
| Norway (single center) [ | 391/425 | 178 | 75 | 96 | 90 | |
| Switzerland (single center) [ | 304 | 53.5 | 79.6 | |||
| Spain(single center)[ | 106 | 221 | 76.4 | 96.5 | 98.1% | 94.6% |
| Our study (single center) | 143 | 87 | 72.7 | 97.7 | 94.4 | 93.1 |
*Because prescleroderma and sine SSc, by definition, would not be tested by the 1980 ACR criteria, only 391 patients was classifiable by 1980 criteria