Literature DB >> 25762528

Performance of the new ACR/EULAR classification criteria for systemic sclerosis in clinical practice.

Suzana Jordan1, Britta Maurer1, Martin Toniolo1, Beat Michel1, Oliver Distler2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The preliminary classification criteria for SSc lack sensitivity for mild/early SSc patients, therefore, the new ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc were developed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the new classification criteria for SSc in clinical practice in a cohort of mild/early patients.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of SSc, based on expert opinion, were prospectively recruited and assessed according to the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) and very early diagnosis of SSc (VEDOSS) recommendations. In some patients, missing values were retrieved retrospectively from the patient's records. Patients were grouped into established SSc (fulfilling the old ACR criteria) and mild/early SSc (not fulfilling the old ACR criteria). The new ACR/EULAR criteria were applied to all patients.
RESULTS: Of the 304 patients available for the final analysis, 162/304 (53.3%) had established SSc and 142/304 (46.7%) had mild/early SSc. All 162 established SSc patients fulfilled the new ACR/EULAR classification criteria. The remaining 142 patients had mild/early SSc. Eighty of these 142 patients (56.3%) fulfilled the new ACR/EULAR classification criteria. Patients with mild/early SSc not fulfilling the new classification criteria were most often suffering from RP, had SSc-characteristic autoantibodies and had an SSc pattern on nailfold capillaroscopy. Taken together, the sensitivity of the new ACR/EULAR classification criteria for the overall cohort was 242/304 (79.6%) compared with 162/304 (53.3%) for the ACR criteria.
CONCLUSION: In this cohort with a focus on mild/early SSc, the new ACR/EULAR classification criteria showed higher sensitivity and classified more patients as definite SSc patients than the ACR criteria.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  classification criteria; early SSc; systemic sclerosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25762528     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  20 in total

1.  Silica-associated systemic sclerosis in 2017: 60 years after Erasmus, where do we stand?

Authors:  Alain Lescoat; Catherine Cavalin; Odile Macchi; Patrick Jégo; Paul-André Rosental
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Validation of the ACR/EULAR classification criteria for systemic sclerosis in patients with early scleroderma.

Authors:  Farley Carvalho Araújo; Cíntia Zumstein Camargo; Cristiane Kayser
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 3.  Stem cell transplantation for systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Sebastian Bruera; Harish Sidanmat; Donald A Molony; Maureen D Mayes; Maria E Suarez-Almazor; Kate Krause; Maria Angeles Lopez-Olivo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-29

Review 4.  A Narrative Review of Pathogenetic and Histopathologic Aspects, Epidemiology, Classification Systems, and Disease Outcome Measures in Systemic Sclerosis.

Authors:  Maria-Grazia Lazzaroni; Silvia Piantoni; Fabrizio Angeli; Stefania Bertocchi; Franco Franceschini; Paolo Airò
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 10.817

5.  Performance of the new American College of Rheumatology classification criteria in Turkish systemic sclerosis patients: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Omer Nuri Pamuk; Mehmet Ali Balcı; Ahmet Mesut Onat; Orhan Zengin; Necati Cakır; Bunyamin Kısacık
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Anticentromere Antibody Levels and Isotypes and the Development of Systemic Sclerosis.

Authors:  Nina M van Leeuwen; Maaike Boonstra; Jaap A Bakker; Annette Grummels; Suzana Jordan; Sophie Liem; Oliver Distler; Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold; Karin Melsens; Vanessa Smith; Marie-Elise Truchetet; Hans U Scherer; René Toes; Tom W J Huizinga; Jeska K de Vries-Bouwstra
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 15.483

7.  Treatment of systemic sclerosis: is there any hope for the future?

Authors:  Yannick Allanore; Marco Matucci-Cerinic; Oliver Distler
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2016-07-04

8.  The 2013 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Classification Criteria for Systemic Sclerosis Could Classify Systemic Sclerosis Patients at Earlier Stage: Data from a Chinese EUSTAR Center.

Authors:  Dong Xu; Yong Hou; Yuanfang Zheng; Yue Zheng; Mengtao Li; Xiaofeng Zeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Recognizing systemic sclerosis: comparative analysis of various sets of classification criteria.

Authors:  Katarzyna Romanowska-Próchnicka; Marcela Walczyk; Marzena Olesińska
Journal:  Reumatologia       Date:  2016-12-30

10.  Nailfold Videocapillaroscopy is a Useful Tool to Recognize Definite Forms of Systemic Sclerosis and Idiopathic Inflammatory Myositis in Interstitial Lung Disease Patients.

Authors:  Domenico Sambataro; Gianluca Sambataro; Alessandro Libra; Giovanna Vignigni; Fabio Pino; Evelina Fagone; Mary Fruciano; Elisa Gili; Francesca Pignataro; Nicoletta Del Papa; Carlo Vancheri
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.