Literature DB >> 27373498

Validation of the 2013 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for systemic sclerosis in patients from a capillaroscopy clinic.

Sheila Melchor1, Beatriz E Joven1, Jose Luis Andreu2, Estibaliz Loza3, M Jesus Garcia de Yebenes3, Loreto Carmona3, Patricia E Carreira4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To validate the 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for systemic sclerosis (SSc) in patients from a capillaroscopy clinic.
METHODS: All patients attended in a capillaroscopy clinic were included. Sociodemographic and SSc-related variables were collected. Using as gold standard for SSc the clinical judgement, the performance (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios) of the 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were calculated for the global score and individual items, and the best cutoffs were obtained.
RESULTS: We included 327 patients (84% women, mean age at capillaroscopy 48 years). Main reasons for capillaroscopy referral were Raynaud's phenomenon (39%) and SSc evaluation (27%). The most frequent final clinical diagnosis were SSc (32.4%) and primary Raynaud's phenomenon (25.7%). The 2013 ACR/EULAR SSc classification criteria were met by 116 patients (35.5%). Sensitivity and specificity of the new criteria were 98.1% and 94.6%, respectively, and positive and negative predictive values were 89.7% and 99.1%. The individual variables with the best sensitivity were Raynaud's phenomenon (99.1%) and abnormal nailfold capillaries (81.1%). All the individual variables, except Raynaud's phenomenon, puffy fingers and sclerodactily showed high specificity values, over 90%. The best cutoffs of the total score were ≥8, ≥9, and ≥10, and the AUC = 0.993.
CONCLUSIONS: We validated the new ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc in unselected patients from a capillaroscopy clinic. Global score and individual items included in the new criteria show high diagnostic accuracy and discriminatory capacity.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification criteria; Systemic sclerosis; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27373498     DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0049-0172            Impact factor:   5.532


  4 in total

Review 1.  A Narrative Review of Pathogenetic and Histopathologic Aspects, Epidemiology, Classification Systems, and Disease Outcome Measures in Systemic Sclerosis.

Authors:  Maria-Grazia Lazzaroni; Silvia Piantoni; Fabrizio Angeli; Stefania Bertocchi; Franco Franceschini; Paolo Airò
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 10.817

2.  The 2013 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Classification Criteria for Systemic Sclerosis Could Classify Systemic Sclerosis Patients at Earlier Stage: Data from a Chinese EUSTAR Center.

Authors:  Dong Xu; Yong Hou; Yuanfang Zheng; Yue Zheng; Mengtao Li; Xiaofeng Zeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Performance of the Revised Classification Criteria for Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases and Their Overlap Syndromes.

Authors:  Yuki Inoue; Takehisa Ogura; Naoko Yamashita; Sayaka Takenaka; Hideki Ito; Ayako Hirata; Takaharu Katagiri; Yuto Takakura; Chihiro Imaizumi; Kennosuke Mizushina; Munetsugu Imamura; Rie Kujime; Norihide Hayashi; Hideto Kameda
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 1.282

4.  Hyaluronic acid and platelet-rich plasma, a new therapeutic alternative for scleroderma patients: a prospective open-label study.

Authors:  Roberto Pirrello; Barbara Verro; Giulia Grasso; Piero Ruscitti; Adriana Cordova; Roberto Giacomelli; Francesco Ciccia; Giuliana Guggino
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 5.156

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.