| Literature DB >> 27846886 |
Jonathan Emeka Emordi1, Esther Oluwatoyin Agbaje2, Ibrahim Adekunle Oreagba2, Osede Ignis Iribhogbe3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder of multiple aetiology characterised by hyperglycemia resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action or both. It is a global epidemic ravaging both developed and developing countries. The situation will worsen if nothing is done urgently. In fact, the need to identify natural products with antidiabetic potentials is of great importance as supported by several research efforts all over the world, in search of antidiabetic plant based products that are safe and efficacious. Available literatures show that several phytochemicals with antidiabetic properties have been identified in certain plants amongst which include Uvaria chamae. The potentials of Uvaria chamae as an antidiabetic and hypolipidemic drug-candidate are thus tested.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; Hypoglycemic effects; Hypolipidemic effects; Streptozotocin; Uvaria chamae
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27846886 PMCID: PMC5111340 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-1450-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Effect of Uvaria chamae on Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) Levels (mg/dl) and % Reduction (% R) of FBG levels
| Group | Day0 | Day1 | Day5 | %R in Day5 | Day 8 | %R in Day8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 74.33 ± 0.88 | 75.66 ± 2.19 | 86.00 ± 3.22 | ……. | 90.67 ± 6.17 | ……. |
| II | 59.33 ± 2.91 | 363.00 ± 50.5* | 270.70 ± 33.17* | 25.43 | 133.30 ± 10.04* | 63.28 |
| III | 63.33 ± 0.67 | 303.00 ± 7.10* | 44.00 ± 7.00* | 85.48 | 42.37 ± 0.52* | 86.02 |
| IV | 54.67 ± 1.45 | 263.30 ± 3.84* | 52.67 ± 7.27* | 80.00 | 48.70 ± 1.04* | 81.50 |
| V | 66.67 ± 3.93 | 325.70 ± 17.85* | 46.00 ± 2.08* | 85.16 | 48.33 ± 0.88* | 85.16 |
| VI | 60.00 ± 4.36 | 242.30 ± 3.93* | 256.30 ± 1.86* | −5.66 | 300.30 ± 2.03* | −23.94 |
*Significant difference (p < 0.05; n = 5) between the Mean ± SEM of test group vs. control. Group I = (control) Normal rats received 0.5 ml (2% solution) of acacia, II = diabetic rats treated with insulin 0.5I.U/kg, III = diabetic rats treated with 400 mg/kg extract, IV = diabetic rats treated with 250 mg/kg extract, V = diabetic rats treated with 100 mg/kg extract, VI = diabetic rats untreated
Effect of Uvaria chamae on Plasma Lipid Profile (mg/dl)
| Parameter | Group I | GroupII | GroupIII | GroupIV | GroupV | Group VI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chol | 126.3 ± 2.3 | 78.0 ± 0.6* | 72.3 ± 0.9* | 70.0 ± 14.4* | 89.33 ± 0.9* | 107.0 ± 0.6 |
| TG | 43.2 ± 0.6 | 42.3 ± 1.9 | 57.3 ± 8.2 | 34.7 ± 0.3 | 61.3 ± 1.9 | 73.7 ± 0.9* |
| HDL | 24.4 ± 0.4 | 25.3 ± 1.9 | 36.3 ± 4.1 | 31.7 ± 0.9 | 30.7 ± 0.7 | 29.7 ± 1.5 |
| LDL | 93.3 ± 0.6 | 44.2 ± 1.9 * | 24.5 ± 7.8* | 31.36 ± 7.13* | 46.37 ± 1.53* | 62.56 ± 2.52 |
*significant difference (p < 0.05; n = 5) between the Mean ± SEM of test group vs. control. Group I = (control) Normal rats received 0.5 ml (2% solution) of acacia, II = diabetic rats treated with insulin 0.5I.U/kg, III = diabetic rats treated with 400 mg/kg extracts, IV = diabetic rats treated with 250 mg/kg extract, V = diabetic rats treated with 100 mg/kg extracts, VI = diabetic rats untreated
Effect of Uvaria chamae on other biochemical parameters on the 8th Day
| Parameter | Group I | Group II | GroupIII | GroupIV | GroupV | Group VI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protein (g/L) | 34.9 ± 0.1 | 25.7 ± 0.9 | 20.0 ± 2.3* | 35.0 ± 1.2 | 23.7 ± 0.3 | 15.0 ± 2.0* |
| ALB (mg/dl) | 43.9 ± 0.3 | 25.3 ± 1.5* | 16.3 ± 1.5* | 37.3 ± 0.9 | 27.0 ± 0.6 | 33.3 ± 1.2 |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 0.6 ± 0.01 | 1.0 ± 0.03 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.03 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 1.13 ± 0.1* |
| Urea mg/dl | 27.7 ± 0.9 | 56.0 ± 0.6* | 64.0 ± 0.6* | 43.3 ± 0.9* | 31.0 ± 0.6 | 46.3 ± 2.3* |
| AST (U/L) | 12.6 ± 0.2 | 27.2 ± 0.2* | 13.3 ± 2.2 | 16.3 ± 0.3 | 13.8 ± 0.2 | 31.1 ± 1.8* |
| ALT (U/L) | 10.8 ± 0.5 | 22.3 ± 1.3* | 11.3 ± 2.2 | 14.8 ± 0.4 | 12.8 ± 0.4 | 27.7 ± 0.7* |
| ALP (U/L) | 13.0 ± 0.3 | 30.7 ± 0.7* | 14.7 ± 2.3 | 23.7 ± 5.7 | 16.7 ± 1.2 | 17.8 ± 0.03 |
*Significant difference (p < 0.05; n = 5) between the Mean ± SEM of test group vs. control. Group I = (control) Normal rats received 0.5 ml (2% solution) of acacia, II = diabetic rats treated with insulin 0.5I.U/kg, III = diabetic rats treated with 400 mg/kg extract, IV = diabetic rats treated with 250 mg/kg extract, V = diabetic rats treated with 100 mg/kg extract, VI = diabetic rats untreated
Effect of Uvaria chamae on the body weight (g)
| Group | Day1 | Day5 | Day8 |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | 130.7 ± 17.9 | 135.7 ± 20.5 | 159.0 ± 2.1 |
| II | 137.7 ± 5.8 | 127.3 ± 16.8 | 167.0 ± 3.5 |
| III | 133.7 ± 5.6 | 140.0 ± 6.1 | 122.7 ± 9.3* |
| IV | 121.0 ± 4.4 | 107.7 ± 4.1 | 102.3 ± 1.5* |
| V | 124.0 ± 7.2 | 118.3 ± 7.1 | 120.0 ± 2.9* |
| VI | 135.0 ± 6.4 | 124.0 ± 2.7 | 118.3 ± 3.5* |
*Significant difference (p < 0.05; n = 5) between the Mean ± SEM of test group vs. control. Group I = (control) Normal rats received 0.5 ml (2% solution) of acacia, II = diabetic rats treated with insulin 0.5I.U/kg, III = diabetic rats treated with 400 mg/kg extract, IV = diabetic rats treated with 250 mg/kg extract, V = diabetic rats treated with 100 mg/kg extracts, VI = diabetic rats untreated
Fig. 1Photomicrograph of the pancreas of normal rat (positive control); H&E x100-A and x400-B showing Islet of Langerhans in plate a (Red arrow) and intact islet cells in plate b (encircled)
Fig. 2Photomicrograph of the pancreas of diabetic rat untreated (negative control); H&E x100 a and x400 b with no Islet of Langerhans
Fig. 3Photomicrograph of the pancreas of diabetic rat treated with 100 mg/kg of Uvaria chamae extract (H&E x100-A and x400-B) showing regenerated cells in the Islet of Langerhans (See plate a; Red arrow) and regenerated islet cells in plate b (encircled)
Fig. 4Photomicrograph of the pancreas of diabetic rat treated with 250 mg/kg of Uvaria chamae extract (H&E x100-A and x400-B) showing regenerated cells in the Islet of Langerhans (See plate a; Red arrow) and regenerated islet cells in plate b (encircled)
Fig. 5Photomicrograph of the pancreas of diabetic rat treated with 400 mg/kg of Uvaria chamae extract (H&Ex100-A and x400-B) showing regenerated cells in the Islet of Langerhans (See plate a; Red arrow) and regenerated islet cells in plate b (encircled)
Fig. 6Photomicrograph of the pancreas of diabetic rat treated with 0.5 IU/kg of insulin (H&E x100-a and x400-b) showing no visible islets