| Literature DB >> 27845719 |
Mawethu P Bilibana1, Avril R Williams2, Candice Rassie3, Christopher E Sunday4, Hlamulo Makelane5, Lindsay Wilson6, Nomaphelo Ntshongontshi7, Abongile N Jijana8, Milua Masikini9, Priscilla G L Baker10, Emmanuel I Iwuoha11.
Abstract
A sensitive and reagentless electrochemical aptatoxisensor was developed on cobalt (II)Entities:
Keywords: aptamer; aptatoxisensor; cyanotoxins; electrochemical biosensor; metallodendrimer; microcystin-LR; nanosensor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27845719 PMCID: PMC5134560 DOI: 10.3390/s16111901
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1First-generation cobalt(II) salicylaldiimine metallodendrimer (SDD–Co(II)).
Figure 2Schematic representation of cobalt(II) salicylaldiimine metallodendrimer aptatoxisensor preparation.
Figure 3Cyclic voltammetric traces for: (A) GCE|SDD–Co(II)|(black); (B) GCE|SDD–Co(II)|AgNPs|(red); and (C) GCE|SDD–Co(II)|AgNPs|MCLRA (green) in 0.1 M PBS at a 100 mV·s−1 scan rate.
Figure 4EIS Nyquist plots of the modified electrodes: (A) GCE|SDD–Co(II)|AgNPs; and (B) GCE|SDD–Co(II)|AgNPs|Aptamer, for experiments performed in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4).
Figure 5FTIR of: (A) GCE|SDD–Co(II); and (B) GCE|SDD–Co(II)|AgNPs.
Figure 6(A) Cyclic voltammograms of aptatoxisensor for detection of MC-LR; and (B) calibration curve showing GCE|SDD–Co(II)|AgNPs|MC-LRA responses to MC-LR.
Real sample aptatoxisensor analysis.
| Sample | [MC-LR] Added (µg·L−1) | [MC-LR] Detected (µg·L−1) | Recovery (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distilled water | 0 | ND | - | - |
| 0.01 | 0.0095 | 95.0 | 4.40 | |
| 0.02 | 0.0195 | 97.3 | 1.50 | |
| 0.04 | 0.0394 | 98.4 | 1.06 | |
| Tap water | 0 | 0.0047 | - | - |
| 0.01 | 0.0096 | 94.3 | 5.01 | |
| 0.02 | 0.0194 | 98.7 | 1.78 | |
| 0.04 | 0.0395 | 97.6 | 0.96 | |
| Wastewater | 0 | 0.0068 | - | - |
| 0.01 | 0.0109 | 109.0 | 1.52 | |
| 0.02 | 0.0290 | 104.2 | 1.18 | |
| 0.04 | 0.0460 | 115.0 | 5.06 |
(-): Undefined values; 0: no spiking with MC-LR; ND: Not detected.
Figure 7Relative CV responses used to evaluate cross-reactivity between freshwater toxins. EE2 = 17β-estradiol; NOD = Nodularin-R; ZEO = zearalenone.
Analysis of MC-LR content in spiked (0.05 µg·L−1) tap, distilled and waste water samples.
| Real Samples | Elisa Result (µg·L−1) | Aptatoxisensor Result (µg·L−1) |
|---|---|---|
| Tap water | ND | 0.047 |
| Distilled water | ND | ND |
| Wastewater | ND | 0.078 |
ND: Not detected.
Comparison of the aptatoxisensor with similar electrochemical sensors and selected analytical techniques used in the screening of MC-LR
| Techniques | DLR (µg·L−1) | LOD (µg·L−1) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| MALDI-TOF MS | 0.11–5.0 | 0.015 | [ |
| Liquid chromatography | 10–500 | 0.1 | [ |
| CLEIA | 0.062–0.65 | 0.032 | [ |
| Mediated label-free Au/AuNPs amperometric immunosensor | 0.05–15 | 0.02 | [ |
| MWCNT electrochemical biosensor | 0.05–20 | 0.04 | [ |
| Graphene/carbon nanosphere electrochemical immunosensor | 0.05–15 | 0.02 | [ |
| ELISA (EnviroGard) | 0.2–4.0 | 0.1 | - |
| ELISA (EnviroLogix) | 0.16–2.5 | 0.147 | - |
| ELISA (Abraxis) | 0.15–5.0 | 0.1 | - |
| Aptatoxisensor | 0.1–1.1 | 0.04 | This study |
DLR: Dynamic linear range; MALDI-TOF MS: Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry; CLEIA: Chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay.