| Literature DB >> 27845719 |
Mawethu P Bilibana1, Avril R Williams2, Candice Rassie3, Christopher E Sunday4, Hlamulo Makelane5, Lindsay Wilson6, Nomaphelo Ntshongontshi7, Abongile N Jijana8, Milua Masikini9, Priscilla G L Baker10, Emmanuel I Iwuoha11.
Abstract
A sensitive and reagentless electrochemical aptatoxisensor was developed on cobalt (II) salicylaldiimine metallodendrimer (SDD-Co(II)) doped with electro-synthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) for microcystin-LR (L, l-leucine; R, l-arginine), or MC-LR, detection in the nanomolar range. The GCE|SDD-Co(II)|AgNPs aptatoxisensor was fabricated with 5' thiolated aptamer through self-assembly on the modified surface of the glassy carbon electrode (GCE) and the electronic response was measured using cyclic voltammetry (CV). Specific binding of MC-LR with the aptamer on GCE|SDD-Co(II)|AgNPs aptatoxisensor caused the formation of a complex that resulted in steric hindrance and electrostatic repulsion culminating in variation of the corresponding peak current of the electrochemical probe. The aptatoxisensor showed a linear response for MC-LR between 0.1 and 1.1 µg·L-1 and the calculated limit of detection (LOD) was 0.04 µg·L-1. In the detection of MC-LR in water samples, the aptatoxisensor proved to be highly sensitive and stable, performed well in the presence of interfering analog and was comparable to the conventional analytical techniques. The results demonstrate that the constructed MC-LR aptatoxisensor is a suitable device for routine quantification of MC-LR in freshwater and environmental samples.Entities:
Keywords: aptamer; aptatoxisensor; cyanotoxins; electrochemical biosensor; metallodendrimer; microcystin-LR; nanosensor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27845719 PMCID: PMC5134560 DOI: 10.3390/s16111901
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1First-generation cobalt(II) salicylaldiimine metallodendrimer (SDD–Co(II)).
Figure 2Schematic representation of cobalt(II) salicylaldiimine metallodendrimer aptatoxisensor preparation.
Figure 3Cyclic voltammetric traces for: (A) GCE|SDD–Co(II)|(black); (B) GCE|SDD–Co(II)|AgNPs|(red); and (C) GCE|SDD–Co(II)|AgNPs|MCLRA (green) in 0.1 M PBS at a 100 mV·s−1 scan rate.
Figure 4EIS Nyquist plots of the modified electrodes: (A) GCE|SDD–Co(II)|AgNPs; and (B) GCE|SDD–Co(II)|AgNPs|Aptamer, for experiments performed in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4).
Figure 5FTIR of: (A) GCE|SDD–Co(II); and (B) GCE|SDD–Co(II)|AgNPs.
Figure 6(A) Cyclic voltammograms of aptatoxisensor for detection of MC-LR; and (B) calibration curve showing GCE|SDD–Co(II)|AgNPs|MC-LRA responses to MC-LR.
Real sample aptatoxisensor analysis.
| Sample | [MC-LR] Added (µg·L−1) | [MC-LR] Detected (µg·L−1) | Recovery (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distilled water | 0 | ND | - | - |
| 0.01 | 0.0095 | 95.0 | 4.40 | |
| 0.02 | 0.0195 | 97.3 | 1.50 | |
| 0.04 | 0.0394 | 98.4 | 1.06 | |
| Tap water | 0 | 0.0047 | - | - |
| 0.01 | 0.0096 | 94.3 | 5.01 | |
| 0.02 | 0.0194 | 98.7 | 1.78 | |
| 0.04 | 0.0395 | 97.6 | 0.96 | |
| Wastewater | 0 | 0.0068 | - | - |
| 0.01 | 0.0109 | 109.0 | 1.52 | |
| 0.02 | 0.0290 | 104.2 | 1.18 | |
| 0.04 | 0.0460 | 115.0 | 5.06 |
(-): Undefined values; 0: no spiking with MC-LR; ND: Not detected.
Figure 7Relative CV responses used to evaluate cross-reactivity between freshwater toxins. EE2 = 17β-estradiol; NOD = Nodularin-R; ZEO = zearalenone.
Analysis of MC-LR content in spiked (0.05 µg·L−1) tap, distilled and waste water samples.
| Real Samples | Elisa Result (µg·L−1) | Aptatoxisensor Result (µg·L−1) |
|---|---|---|
| Tap water | ND | 0.047 |
| Distilled water | ND | ND |
| Wastewater | ND | 0.078 |
ND: Not detected.
Comparison of the aptatoxisensor with similar electrochemical sensors and selected analytical techniques used in the screening of MC-LR
| Techniques | DLR (µg·L−1) | LOD (µg·L−1) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| MALDI-TOF MS | 0.11–5.0 | 0.015 | [ |
| Liquid chromatography | 10–500 | 0.1 | [ |
| CLEIA | 0.062–0.65 | 0.032 | [ |
| Mediated label-free Au/AuNPs amperometric immunosensor | 0.05–15 | 0.02 | [ |
| MWCNT electrochemical biosensor | 0.05–20 | 0.04 | [ |
| Graphene/carbon nanosphere electrochemical immunosensor | 0.05–15 | 0.02 | [ |
| ELISA (EnviroGard) | 0.2–4.0 | 0.1 | - |
| ELISA (EnviroLogix) | 0.16–2.5 | 0.147 | - |
| ELISA (Abraxis) | 0.15–5.0 | 0.1 | - |
| Aptatoxisensor | 0.1–1.1 | 0.04 | This study |
DLR: Dynamic linear range; MALDI-TOF MS: Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry; CLEIA: Chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay.