Literature DB >> 31184561

PI-RADS Steering Committee: The PI-RADS Multiparametric MRI and MRI-directed Biopsy Pathway.

Anwar R Padhani1, Jelle Barentsz1, Geert Villeirs1, Andrew B Rosenkrantz1, Daniel J Margolis1, Baris Turkbey1, Harriet C Thoeny1, François Cornud1, Masoom A Haider1, Katarzyna J Macura1, Clare M Tempany1, Sadhna Verma1, Jeffrey C Weinreb1.   

Abstract

High-quality evidence shows that MRI in biopsy-naive men can reduce the number of men who need prostate biopsy and can reduce the number of diagnoses of clinically insignificant cancers that are unlikely to cause harm. In men with prior negative biopsy results who remain under persistent suspicion, MRI improves the detection and localization of life-threatening prostate cancer with greater clinical utility than the current standard of care, systematic transrectal US-guided biopsy. Systematic analyses show that MRI-directed biopsy increases the effectiveness of the prostate cancer diagnosis pathway. The incorporation of MRI-directed pathways into clinical care guidelines in prostate cancer detection has begun. The widespread adoption of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for multiparametric MRI data acquisition, interpretation, and reporting has promoted these changes in practice. The PI-RADS MRI-directed biopsy pathway enables the delivery of key diagnostic benefits to men suspected of having cancer based on clinical suspicion. Herein, the PI-RADS Steering Committee discusses how the MRI pathway should be incorporated into routine clinical practice and the challenges in delivering the positive health impacts needed by men suspected of having clinically significant prostate cancer. © RSNA, 2019.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31184561      PMCID: PMC6677282          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  78 in total

1.  Developing a new PI-RADS v2-based nomogram for forecasting high-grade prostate cancer.

Authors:  X-K Niu; W-F He; Y Zhang; S K Das; J Li; Y Xiong; Y-H Wang
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.

Authors:  Marloes van der Leest; Erik Cornel; Bas Israël; Rianne Hendriks; Anwar R Padhani; Martijn Hoogenboom; Patrik Zamecnik; Dirk Bakker; Anglita Yanti Setiasti; Jeroen Veltman; Huib van den Hout; Hans van der Lelij; Inge van Oort; Sjoerd Klaver; Frans Debruyne; Michiel Sedelaar; Gerjon Hannink; Maroeska Rovers; Christina Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  The Prevalence of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer According to Commonly Used Histological Thresholds in Men Undergoing Template Prostate Mapping Biopsies.

Authors:  M Valerio; C Anele; S R J Bott; S C Charman; J van der Meulen; H El-Mahallawi; A M Emara; A Freeman; C Jameson; R G Hindley; B S I Montgomery; P B Singh; H U Ahmed; M Emberton
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate Predicts Absence of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on 12-Core Template Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Amanda J Lu; Jamil S Syed; Kevin A Nguyen; Cayce B Nawaf; James Rosoff; Michael Spektor; Angelique Levi; Peter A Humphrey; Jeffrey C Weinreb; Peter G Schulam; Preston C Sprenkle
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Diagnostic Pathway with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Standard Pathway: Results from a Randomized Prospective Study in Biopsy-naïve Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Porpiglia; Matteo Manfredi; Fabrizio Mele; Marco Cossu; Enrico Bollito; Andrea Veltri; Stefano Cirillo; Daniele Regge; Riccardo Faletti; Roberto Passera; Cristian Fiori; Stefano De Luca
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.

Authors:  Arnout R Alberts; Monique J Roobol; Jan F M Verbeek; Ivo G Schoots; Peter K Chiu; Daniël F Osses; Jasper D Tijsterman; Harrie P Beerlage; Christophe K Mannaerts; Lars Schimmöller; Peter Albers; Christian Arsov
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Active Surveillance for the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer (Cancer Care Ontario Guideline): American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement.

Authors:  Ronald C Chen; R Bryan Rumble; D Andrew Loblaw; Antonio Finelli; Behfar Ehdaie; Matthew R Cooperberg; Scott C Morgan; Scott Tyldesley; John J Haluschak; Winston Tan; Stewart Justman; Suneil Jain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Accuracy of Transperineal Targeted Prostate Biopsies, Visual Estimation and Image Fusion in Men Needing Repeat Biopsy in the PICTURE Trial.

Authors:  Lucy A M Simmons; Abi Kanthabalan; Manit Arya; Tim Briggs; Dean Barratt; Susan C Charman; Alex Freeman; David Hawkes; Yipeng Hu; Charles Jameson; Neil McCartan; Caroline M Moore; Shonit Punwani; Jan van der Muelen; Mark Emberton; Hashim U Ahmed
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Multicentre evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging supported transperineal prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with suspicion of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nienke L Hansen; Tristan Barrett; Claudia Kesch; Lana Pepdjonovic; David Bonekamp; Richard O'Sullivan; Florian Distler; Anne Warren; Christina Samel; Boris Hadaschik; Jeremy Grummet; Christof Kastner
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Results of Targeted Biopsy in Men with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions Classified Equivocal, Likely or Highly Likely to Be Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Wulphert Venderink; Annemarijke van Luijtelaar; Joyce G R Bomers; Marloes van der Leest; Christina Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Jelle O Barentsz; J P Michiel Sedelaar; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  44 in total

1.  Confirmatory MRI-guided Biopsy Following Positive Transrectal US-guided Biopsy Results in Improved Risk Stratification and Treatment Planning for Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Clifford R Weiss; Alex J Solomon
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-09-25

2.  [Is contrast medium essential in the initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnosis of prostate cancer?]

Authors:  J P Radtke; L Schimmöller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  A multifaceted approach to quality in the MRI-directed biopsy pathway for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Ivo G Schoots; Baris Turkbey; Gianluca Giannarini; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Detecting Prostate Cancer with Deep Learning for MRI: A Small Step Forward.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Doctor, a patient is on the phone asking about the endorectal coil!

Authors:  Valdair Francisco Muglia; Hebert Alberto Vargas
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12

6.  When to biopsy Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) assessment category 3 lesions? Use of clinical and imaging variables to predict cancer diagnosis at targeted biopsy.

Authors:  Christopher S Lim; Jorge Abreu-Gomez; Michel-Alexandre Leblond; Ivan Carrion; Danny Vesprini; Nicola Schieda; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  External validation of Cormio nomogram for predicting all prostate cancers and clinically significant prostate cancers.

Authors:  Luca Cindolo; Riccardo Bertolo; Andrea Minervini; Francesco Sessa; Gianluca Muto; Pierluigi Bove; Matteo Vittori; Giorgio Bozzini; Pietro Castellan; Filippo Mugavero; Mario Falsaperla; Luigi Schips; Antonio Celia; Maida Bada; Angelo Porreca; Antonio Pastore; Yazan Al Salhi; Marco Giampaoli; Giovanni Novella; Riccardo Rizzetto; Nicoló Trabacchin; Guglielmo Mantica; Giovannalberto Pini; Riccardo Lombardo; Andrea Tubaro; Alessandro Antonelli; Cosimo De Nunzio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Focal Treatment of Prostate Cancer: MRI Helps Guide the Way Forward.

Authors:  Clare M C Tempany-Afdhal
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  The Value of Low Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores in Preventing Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies.

Authors:  Dong-Soo Kim; Sung-Kyoung Moon; Joo-Won Lim; Seung-Hyun Jeon; Sang-Hyub Lee
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 2.430

10.  Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System: Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance between Version 2.0 and 2.1 for Prostatic Peripheral Zone.

Authors:  Hyun Soo Kim; Ghee Young Kwon; Min Je Kim; Sung Yoon Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.