| Literature DB >> 27840845 |
Emily F Rabinsky1, Bishnu P Joshi1, Asha Pant1, Juan Zhou1, Xiyu Duan2, Arlene Smith1, Rork Kuick3, Shuling Fan4, Asma Nusrat4, Scott R Owens4, Henry D Appelman4, Thomas D Wang5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Conventional white-light colonoscopy aims to reduce the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC). CRC has been found to arise from missed polypoid and flat precancerous lesions. We aimed to establish proof-of-concept for real-time endoscopic imaging of colonic adenomas using a near-infrared peptide that is specific for claudin-1.Entities:
Keywords: APC, adenomatous polyposis coli; BSA, bovine serum albumin; CLDN1, claudin-1; CRC, colorectal cancer; Colon Cancer; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; Early Detection; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; IF, immunofluorescence; IHC, immunohistochemistry; Molecular Imaging; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PBST, phosphate-buffered saline plus 0.1% Tween-20; PFA, paraformaldehyde; RT, room temperature; SSA, sessile serrated adenoma; T/B, target-to-background; TEER, transepithelial electrical resistance; TFA, trifluoroacetic acid; ZO-1, zonula occludens-1; siCL, control small interfering RNA; siRNA, small interfering RNA
Year: 2015 PMID: 27840845 PMCID: PMC4980721 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2015.12.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol ISSN: 2352-345X
Figure 1Claudin-1 is an early target for CRC. (A) From the GSE41258 gene expression data set, the mean (±SD) base-2 log level for claudin-1 was 4.8 ± 0.8 and 3.5 ± 0.4 for human adenomas (n = 45) and normal (n = 52) colonic mucosa, resulting in an average difference of 2.54-fold (P = 9.4 × 10-18) by 2-sample t test. On immunohistochemistry, minimal staining was observed from representative sections of (B) normal and (C) hyperplastic polyps. Intense cell surface staining (arrows) was seen in representative sections of (D) SSAs and (E) adenomas from human proximal colon specimens. By using a standard IHC scoring system, overexpression (2+/3+) of claudin-1 was found in 14% (4 of 28) of normal, 17% (2 of 12) of hyperplastic polyps, 73% (8 of 11) of SSAs, and 87% (26 of 30) of adenomas.
Figure 2Peptide specific for claudin-1. (A) The extracellular loop of CLDN1, consisting of amino acids 53–80 (red), was used to select the (B) peptide with sequence RTSPSSR. The chemical structure of the peptide (black) with a GGGSK linker (blue) and Cy5.5 label (red) is shown. (C) Scrambled peptide with sequence SPTSSRR labeled with Cy5.5 is used as control. (D) Fluorescence spectra with λex = 671-nm excitation shows peak emission in near-infrared at 710 nm for both peptides. (E) For RTS*-Cy5.5, the mass-to-charge (m/z) ratio of 1740.9 was measured on mass spectrometry, which agrees with the expected value.
Figure 3Validation of specific peptide binding to claudin-1 with human CRC cells. On confocal microscopy, RTS*-Cy5.5 showed different levels of binding to the cell surface (arrow) of (A) SW480, (B) SW620, and (C) HCT116 cells. (D–F) Minimal signal is observed for SPT*-Cy5.5 to each of the cells. (G) RTS*-Cy5.5 showed higher fluorescence intensities than SPT*-Cy5.5 on binding to SW480 and SW620 cells with a 7.8 and 4.3 average fold-change (P = 2 × 10-5 and 4 × 10-4) respectively. A small nonsignificant increase was observed for HCT116 cells with a 0.64 average fold-change (P = .19). The differences between RTS*-Cy5.5 and SPT*-Cy5.5 were significantly larger for SW480 and SW620 than the same difference for HCT116 with 12.3 and 6.8 average fold-change (P = 10-4 and 10-3), respectively. We fit a 1-way analysis of variance model to log-transformed data with terms for the means of 6 conditions, testing for RTS*-Cy5.5 vs SPT*-Cy5.5 and the difference of those differences between the cell lines. Measurements are an average of 10 randomly chosen cells from each of 3 slides for each condition. (H) Western blot shows claudin-1 expression in the cytoplasmic fraction (C) and on the plasma membrane (M) for each cell. Confocal fluorescence images show strong binding of (I) RTS*-Cy5.5 peptide (red) and (J) AF488-labeled anti-CLDN1 antibody (green) to the surface (arrow) of control SW620 cells (transfected with nontargeting siRNA, siCL). (K) Binding by the SPT*-Cy5.5 (red) control peptide is minimal. (L–N) The fluorescence intensities were reduced significantly in knockdown SW620 cells transfected with CLDN1-targeted siRNA, siCLDN1. (O) We fit a 2-way analysis of variance model with terms for siRNA type (knockdown and control) and targeting moieties (RTS*-Cy5.5, anti-CLDN1, and SPT*-Cy5.5) and their interactions to the average intensities on each slide (10 cells per slide with 2 slides per condition). The signal for RTS*-Cy5.5 decreased more than 10-fold with siRNA knockdown of CLDN1 (P = 2 × 10-7), which was a significantly larger decrease than the same difference for the control peptide (P = 10-6). The antibody signal also decreased significantly (P = 5 × 10-7). (P) Western blot shown for control (siCL) and knockdown (siCLDN1) SW620 cells.
Figure 4Characterization of claudin-1 peptide binding. (A) On competition, RTS*-Cy5.5 showed less binding to SW620 cells with addition of unlabeled RTS* at concentrations of 25 μmol/L and higher compared with a concentration of 0 μmol/L. With unlabeled RTS* at concentrations of 200 and 400 umol/L, the signal from RTS*-Cy5.5 was significantly lower than that measured when competing with unlabeled SPT* at the same concentrations (P < 2 × 10-5). Analysis was performed using an analysis of variance model with terms for 8 means fit to log-transformed data. Measurements are an average of 10 randomly chosen cells on each of 3 slides at each condition for RTS* and 2 slides for each condition for SPT*. (B) We measured an apparent dissociation constant (binding affinity) of kd = 42 nmol/L and R2 = 0.95 for RTS*-Cy5.5 to SW620 cells. (C) We measured an apparent association time constant of k = 0.83 min-1, which corresponds to less than 1.2 minutes. Results for each measurement are representative of 2 independent experiments.
Figure 5Tight junction function and ZO-1 distribution are not altered by claudin-1 peptide. (A) Confluent T84 monolayers were incubated with either 5 μmol RTS* or SPT* (control), peptides show high TEER for up to 24 hours. Immunofluorescence shows localization of (B and E) anti–ZO-1 and (C and F) anti-CLDN1 antibodies on the apical plasma membrane of tight junctions at 24 hours after peptide incubation. (D) RTS* peptide partially localizes to cellular junctions.
Figure 6Increased claudin-1 expression in Strong staining of claudin-1 in dysplasia is seen with (A) IHC and (B) IF using AF488 label. (C) Representative histology (H&E) for dysplasia. Minimal expression of claudin-1 was observed in normal colonic mucosa on (D) immunohistochemistry and (E) immunofluorescence. (F) Representative histology (H&E) for normal.
Figure 7In vivo imaging in White-light images show (A and B) a spontaneous polyp (arrow) and (C) normal-appearing mucosa. Near-infrared fluorescence images after topical administration of RTS*-Cy5.5 shows (D) increased intensity from the polyp (arrow) in panel A, (E) presence of a flat lesion above the polyp in panel B, and (F) flat lesions not apparent on the white-light image in panel C. Representative individual images were extracted from videos recorded at 15 frames per second, which showed minimum motion artifact and absence of debris (stool, mucus). Histology (H&E) of (G) the polyp in panel A and (H) the flat lesion in panel B shows features of low-grade dysplasia. (I) From 5 mice, RTS*-Cy5.5 had a higher mean (±SD) T/B ratio than SPT*-Cy5.5 for 8 polyps (2.3 ± 0.3 and 1.2 ± 0.2, respectively; P = 3×10-4 by paired t test) and 9 flat lesions (1.9 ± 0.5 and 1.1 ± 0.2, respectively; P = 8 × 10-3 by paired t test).
Figure 8Ex vivo validation of peptide binding to colonic dysplasia. (A) Representative white-light image of excised distal 2 cm of mouse colonic mucosa accessed by endoscopy after RTS*-Cy5.5 was administered topically in vivo. (B) Near-infrared image shows regions of increased fluorescence intensity. (C) Histology (H&E) sectioned parallel to mucosal surface was evaluated for the presence of dysplasia by an expert gastrointestinal pathologist (S.R.O.). Expanded views of (D) normal and (E) dysplasia (original magnification: 20×). (F) From 3 mice, the mean (±SD) T/B ratio was significantly higher for 9 regions of dysplasia compared with 7 normal (2.4 ± 0.6 vs 1.1 ± 0.1, respectively; P = 2 × 10-4 by unpaired t test).
Figure 9Binding of claudin-1 peptide to human proximal colonic neoplasia. On confocal microscopy, there was minimal binding of RTS*-Cy5.5 peptide (red) and AF488-labeled anti–claudin-1 antibody (green) to human (A) normal colonic mucosa and (B) hyperplastic polyps. DAPI (blue) identifies nuclei. Strong staining with both peptide and antibody was observed for representative specimens of (C) SSAs and (D) adenomas from the proximal colon. The extent of co-localization of peptide and antibody binding is characterized by the Pearson correlation coefficient ρ. Representative images were selected from 28 normal, 12 hyperplastic polyps, 11 SSAs, and 30 adenomas. (E) We found a significantly greater mean (±SD) intensity for adenomas (25.5 ± 14.0) vs normal (9.1 ± 6.0) and hyperplastic polyps (3.1 ± 3.7) (P = 10-5 and 8 × 10-12, respectively), as well as for SSAs (20.1 ± 13.3) vs normal and hyperplastic polyps (P = .02 and 3 × 10-7, respectively). Analysis of variance models (ANOVA) were used with means for 4 groups, fit to log-transformed data. The fluorescence intensities from 3 boxes (20 × 20 μm2) located randomly on cells within each specimen were measured and averaged. (F) The receiver operator characteristic curve shows an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87.