Literature DB >> 15476154

Flat adenomas in the National Polyp Study: is there increased risk for high-grade dysplasia initially or during surveillance?

Michael J O'brien1, Sidney J Winawer, Ann G Zauber, Marijayne T Bushey, Stephen S Sternberg, Leonard S Gottlieb, John H Bond, Jerome D Waye, Melvin Schapiro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The flat adenoma may be a more aggressive pathway in colorectal carcinogenesis. Sessile adenomas from the National Polyp Study cohort were reclassified histopathologically as flat or polypoid and compared with initial and surveillance pathology.
METHODS: A total of 933 sessile adenomas detected during 1980-1990 were reclassified as follows: (1) adenoma thickness (AT): < or =1.3 mm, and (2) adenoma ratio (AR): adenoma thickness <2x normal mucosa thickness. Logistic regression was used to assess whether flat adenomas had an effect on risk for high-grade dysplasia initially, and a Cox proportional hazards model assessed the risk for advanced adenomas at surveillance.
RESULTS: The analysis encompassed 8401 person-years of follow-up evaluation. AT and AR measures of adenoma flatness were 95% concordant. By the AT measure, flat adenomas (n = 474) represented 27% of all baseline adenomas. Flat adenomas were found to be no more likely to exhibit high-grade dysplasia than sessile (polypoid) or pedunculated adenomas, the odds ratio for high-grade dysplasia was 1.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-5.47; P = 0.23) for sessile (polypoid) vs. flat adenomas and 1.78 (95% CI, 0.63-5.02; P = 0.28) for pedunculated vs. flat adenomas adjusted for size, villous component, and location, and corrected for correlation of risk within an individual patient. Patients with flat adenomas at initial colonoscopy were not at greater risk for advanced adenomas at surveillance compared with those with polypoid adenomas only, the odds ratio was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.4-1.42; P = .39), adjusted for multiplicity, age, and family history of colorectal cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Flat adenomas identified in the National Polyp Study cohort at baseline were not associated with a higher risk for high-grade dysplasia initially, or for advanced adenomas at surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15476154     DOI: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00392-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  34 in total

1.  CAGS and ACS Evidence Based Reviews in Surgery. 33 The association between colonoscopy and deaths from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Elijah Dixon; James Church; Robin Boushey; Guillaume Martel
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Carpet lesions detected at CT colonography: clinical, imaging, and pathologic features.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Vu P Lam; Jennifer M Weiss; Gregory D Kennedy; David H Kim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  CT colonography: an update.

Authors:  Andrik J Aschoff; Andrea S Ernst; Hans-Juergen Brambs; Markus S Juchems
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Bowel preparations as quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jae Young Jang; Hoon Jai Chun
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  In vivo targeting of colonic dysplasia on fluorescence endoscopy with near-infrared octapeptide.

Authors:  Zhongyao Liu; Sharon J Miller; Bishnu P Joshi; Thomas D Wang
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  The Natural History of Colorectal Polyps: Overview of Predictive Static and Dynamic Features.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Bryan Dustin Pooler; David H Kim; Cesare Hassan; Kristina A Matkowskyj; Richard B Halberg
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 7.  Diversity of axin in signaling pathways and its relation to colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nighat Parveen; Mahboob Ul Hussain; Arshad A Pandith; Syed Mudassar
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 8.  CT colonography for population screening: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  CT colonography: computer-aided detection of morphologically flat T1 colonic carcinoma.

Authors:  Stuart A Taylor; Gen Iinuma; Yutaka Saito; Jie Zhang; Steve Halligan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Colorectal lateral spreading tumor subtypes: clinicopathology and outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Mei-Dong Xu; Xiao-Yun Wang; Quan-Lin Li; Ping-Hong Zhou; Yi-Qun Zhang; Yun-Shi Zhong; Wei-Feng Chen; Li-Li Ma; Wen-Zheng Qin; Jian-Wei Hu; Li-Qing Yao
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.