Literature DB >> 27838286

Topological false discovery rates for brain mapping based on signal height.

Junning Li1, Jin Kyu Gahm2, Yonggang Shi3, Arthur W Toga4.   

Abstract

Correcting the effect of multiple testing is important in statistical parametric mapping. If the threshold is too liberal, then spurious claims may flood in; if it is too conservative, then true hints may be overlooked. It is highly desirable to combine random field theory and the false discovery rate (FDR) to achieve more powerful detection under gauged topological errors. However, the current FDR method based on peak height does not fully meet this expectation, and sometimes is more conservative than the traditional family-wise error rate method, for unexplained reasons. In this paper, we introduce a new topological FDR method based on signal height. As analyzed in theory and validated with extensive experiments, it controls error rates much more accurately than the peak FDR method does, and substantially gains detection power. In addition, we discover reasons behind the peak FDR method's under-performance, and formulate equations to predict the two methods' behavior.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  False discovery rate; Statistical parametric mapping

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27838286      PMCID: PMC5423870          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  12 in total

1.  Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate.

Authors:  Christopher R Genovese; Nicole A Lazar; Thomas Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Riemannian Metric Optimization for Connectivity-driven Surface Mapping.

Authors:  Jin Kyu Gahm; Yonggang Shi
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2016-10-02

3.  False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields.

Authors:  Justin R Chumbley; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent.

Authors:  K J Friston; K J Worsley; R S Frackowiak; J C Mazziotta; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Transformation Invariant Control of Voxel-Wise False Discovery Rate.

Authors:  Junning Li; Yonggang Shi; Arthur W Toga
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates.

Authors:  Anders Eklund; Thomas E Nichols; Hans Knutsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Inverse-consistent surface mapping with Laplace-Beltrami eigen-features.

Authors:  Yonggang Shi; Jonathan H Morra; Paul M Thompson; Arthur W Toga
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2009

8.  MULTIPLE TESTING OF LOCAL MAXIMA FOR DETECTION OF PEAKS IN 1D.

Authors:  Armin Schwartzman; Yulia Gavrilov; Robert J Adler
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.028

9.  Many Phenotypes Without Many False Discoveries: Error Controlling Strategies for Multitrait Association Studies.

Authors:  Christine B Peterson; Marina Bogomolov; Yoav Benjamini; Chiara Sabatti
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.135

10.  Topological FDR for neuroimaging.

Authors:  J Chumbley; K Worsley; G Flandin; K Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.