Literature DB >> 27838275

Local Immediate versus Long-Range Delayed Changes in Functional Connectivity Following rTMS on the Visual Attention Network.

Lorella Battelli1, Emily D Grossman2, Ela B Plow3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The interhemispheric competition hypothesis attributes the distribution of selective attention to a balance of mutual inhibition between homotopic, interhemispheric connections in parietal cortex (Kinsbourne 1977; Battelli et al., 2009). In support of this hypothesis, repetitive inhibitory TMS over right parietal cortex in healthy individuals rapidly induces interhemispheric imbalance in cortical activity that spreads beyond the site of stimulation (Plow et al., 2014). Behaviorally, the impacts of inhibitory rTMS may be long delayed from the onset of stimulation, as much as 30 minutes (Agosta et al., 2014; Hubl et al., 2008).
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we examine the temporal dynamics of inhibitory rTMS on cortical network integrity that supports sustained visual attention.
METHODS: Healthy individuals received 15 min of 1 Hz offline, inhibitory rTMS (or sham) over left parietal cortex, and then immediately engaged in a bilateral visual tracking task while we recorded brain activity with fMRI. We computed functional connectivity (FC) between three nodes of the attention network engaged by visual tracking: the intraparietal sulcus (IPS), frontal eye fields (FEF) and human MT+ (hMT+).
RESULTS: FC immediately and significantly decreased between the stimulation site (left IPS) and all other regions, then recovered to normal levels within 30 minutes. rTMS increased FC between left and right FEF at approximately 36 min following stimulation, and between sites in the unstimulated hemisphere approximately 48 min after stimulation.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate large-scale changes in cortical organization following inhibitory rTMS. The immediate impact of rTMS on connectivity to the stimulation site dovetails with the putative role of interhemispheric balance for bilateral visual sustained attention. The delayed, compensatory increases in functional connectivity have implications for models of dynamic reorganization in networks supporting spatial and nonspatial selective attention, and compensatory mechanisms within these networks that may be stabilized in chronic stroke. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional connectivity; Intraparietal sulcus; Visual attention; fMRI; rTMS

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27838275      PMCID: PMC5316353          DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  56 in total

1.  Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Michelle J Kincade; Chris Lewis; Abraham Z Snyder; Ayelet Sapir
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-10-23       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Quadrantic deficit reveals anatomical constraints on selection.

Authors:  Thomas A Carlson; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer.

Authors:  Mark Hallett
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Unilateral right parietal damage leads to bilateral deficit for high-level motion.

Authors:  L Battelli; P Cavanagh; J Intriligator; M J Tramo; M A Hénaff; F Michèl; J J Barton
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-12-20       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation during positron emission tomography: a new method for studying connectivity of the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  T Paus; R Jech; C J Thompson; R Comeau; T Peters; A C Evans
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Frontal eye fields control attentional modulation of alpha and gamma oscillations in contralateral occipitoparietal cortex.

Authors:  Tom R Marshall; Jacinta O'Shea; Ole Jensen; Til O Bergmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Spatial neglect and attention networks.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Modulating cortical connectivity in stroke patients by rTMS assessed with fMRI and dynamic causal modeling.

Authors:  Christian Grefkes; Dennis A Nowak; Ling E Wang; Manuel Dafotakis; Simon B Eickhoff; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Studying the role of human parietal cortex in visuospatial attention with concurrent TMS-fMRI.

Authors:  Felix Blankenburg; Christian C Ruff; Sven Bestmann; Otto Bjoertomt; Oliver Josephs; Ralf Deichmann; Jon Driver
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  The compensatory dynamic of inter-hemispheric interactions in visuospatial attention revealed using rTMS and fMRI.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; Zaira Cattaneo; Thomas A Carlson; George A Alvarez; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Lorella Battelli
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  10 in total

1.  Attention network modulation via tRNS correlates with attention gain.

Authors:  Federica Contò; Grace Edwards; Sarah Tyler; Danielle Parrott; Emily Grossman; Lorella Battelli
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Genetic profile for dopamine signaling predicts brain functional reactivity to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Haejin Hong; Rye Young Kim; Soo Mee Lim; Suji Lee; Yumi Song; Chaewon Suh; Hyangwon Lee; In Kyoon Lyoo; Sujung Yoon
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 5.760

3.  A Single Session of rTMS Enhances Small-Worldness in Writer's Cramp: Evidence from Simultaneous EEG-fMRI Multi-Modal Brain Graph.

Authors:  Rose D Bharath; Rajanikant Panda; Venkateswara Reddy Reddam; M V Bhaskar; Suril Gohel; Sujas Bhardwaj; Arvind Prajapati; Pramod Kumar Pal
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over right intraparietal sulcus enhances emotional face processing in the left visual field.

Authors:  Chenggui Fan; Chaoyang Wan; Junjun Zhang; Zhenlan Jin; Ling Li
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Visuospatial Neglect - a Theory-Informed Overview of Current and Emerging Strategies and a Systematic Review on the Therapeutic Use of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Paul Theo Zebhauser; Marine Vernet; Evelyn Unterburger; Anna-Katharine Brem
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 7.444

6.  Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with visual scanning treatment on cognitive and behavioral symptoms of left hemispatial neglect in right hemispheric stroke patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Francesco Di Gregorio; Fabio La Porta; Emanuela Casanova; Elisabetta Magni; Roberta Bonora; Maria Grazia Ercolino; Valeria Petrone; Maria Rosaria Leo; Roberto Piperno
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Controlling Brain State Prior to Stimulation of Parietal Cortex Prevents Deterioration of Sustained Attention.

Authors:  Grace Edwards; Federica Contò; Loryn K Bucci; Lorella Battelli
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-09-30

8.  Non-predictive online spatial coding in the posterior parietal cortex when aiming ahead for catching.

Authors:  Sinéad A Reid; Joost C Dessing
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Pregenual or subgenual anterior cingulate cortex as potential effective region for brain stimulation of depression.

Authors:  Ying Jing; Na Zhao; Xin-Ping Deng; Zi-Jian Feng; Guo-Feng Huang; Meng Meng; Yu-Feng Zang; Jue Wang
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 2.708

10.  Understanding diaschisis models of attention dysfunction with rTMS.

Authors:  Javier O Garcia; Lorella Battelli; Ela Plow; Zaira Cattaneo; Jean Vettel; Emily D Grossman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.996

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.