Literature DB >> 25632139

Frontal eye fields control attentional modulation of alpha and gamma oscillations in contralateral occipitoparietal cortex.

Tom R Marshall1, Jacinta O'Shea2, Ole Jensen3, Til O Bergmann4.   

Abstract

Covertly directing visuospatial attention produces a frequency-specific modulation of neuronal oscillations in occipital and parietal cortices: anticipatory alpha (8-12 Hz) power decreases contralateral and increases ipsilateral to attention, whereas stimulus-induced gamma (>40 Hz) power is boosted contralaterally and attenuated ipsilaterally. These modulations must be under top-down control; however, the control mechanisms are not yet fully understood. Here we investigated the causal contribution of the human frontal eye field (FEF) by combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with subsequent magnetoencephalography. Following inhibitory theta burst stimulation to the left FEF, right FEF, or vertex, participants performed a visual discrimination task requiring covert attention to either visual hemifield. Both left and right FEF TMS caused marked attenuation of alpha modulation in the occipitoparietal cortex. Notably, alpha modulation was consistently reduced in the hemisphere contralateral to stimulation, leaving the ipsilateral hemisphere relatively unaffected. Additionally, right FEF TMS enhanced gamma modulation in left visual cortex. Behaviorally, TMS caused a relative slowing of response times to targets contralateral to stimulation during the early task period. Our results suggest that left and right FEF are causally involved in the attentional top-down control of anticipatory alpha power in the contralateral visual system, whereas a right-hemispheric dominance seems to exist for control of stimulus-induced gamma power. These findings contrast the assumption of primarily intrahemispheric connectivity between FEF and parietal cortex, emphasizing the relevance of interhemispheric interactions. The contralaterality of effects may result from a transient functional reorganization of the dorsal attention network after inhibition of either FEF.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/351638-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dorsal attentional network; frontal eye field; magnetoencephalography; transcranial magnetic stimulation; visual attention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25632139      PMCID: PMC4308606          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3116-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  59 in total

1.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation.

Authors:  T P Jung; S Makeig; C Humphries; T W Lee; M J McKeown; V Iragui; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention.

Authors:  P Fries; J H Reynolds; A E Rorie; R Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Neuronal synchronization along the dorsal visual pathway reflects the focus of spatial attention.

Authors:  Markus Siegel; Tobias H Donner; Robert Oostenveld; Pascal Fries; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  FEF-microstimulation causes task-dependent modulation of occipital fMRI activity.

Authors:  Elsie Premereur; Peter Janssen; Wim Vanduffel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Online and offline tools for head movement compensation in MEG.

Authors:  Arjen Stolk; Ana Todorovic; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen; Robert Oostenveld
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: Studying neural interactions in the human brain.

Authors:  J Gross; J Kujala; M Hamalainen; L Timmermann; A Schnitzler; R Salmelin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Loss of resting interhemispheric functional connectivity after complete section of the corpus callosum.

Authors:  James M Johnston; S Neil Vaishnavi; Matthew D Smyth; Dongyang Zhang; Biyu J He; John M Zempel; Joshua S Shimony; Abraham Z Snyder; Marcus E Raichle
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  FEF TMS affects visual cortical activity.

Authors:  Paul C J Taylor; Anna C Nobre; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data.

Authors:  Robert Oostenveld; Pascal Fries; Eric Maris; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-23

10.  Hemispheric differences in frontal and parietal influences on human occipital cortex: direct confirmation with concurrent TMS-fMRI.

Authors:  Christian C Ruff; Felix Blankenburg; Otto Bjoertomt; Sven Bestmann; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Jon Driver
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  71 in total

1.  Oscillations during observations: Dynamic oscillatory networks serving visuospatial attention.

Authors:  Alex I Wiesman; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Amy L Proskovec; Timothy J McDermott; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Functional MRI and EEG Index Complementary Attentional Modulations.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Thomas C Sprague; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  FEF-Controlled Alpha Delay Activity Precedes Stimulus-Induced Gamma-Band Activity in Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Tzvetan Popov; Sabine Kastner; Ole Jensen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Cross-frequency coupling of alpha oscillatory power to the entrainment rhythm of a spatially attended input stream.

Authors:  Tommy J Wilson; John J Foxe
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.065

5.  Polarity-dependent modulation of multi-spectral neuronal activity by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Alex I Wiesman; Mackenzie S Mills; Timothy J McDermott; Rachel K Spooner; Nathan M Coolidge; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of auditory attention synchronize with speech.

Authors:  Malte Wöstmann; Björn Herrmann; Burkhard Maess; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Feature-Selective Attentional Modulations in Human Frontoparietal Cortex.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; David W Sutterer; John T Serences; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Oscillatory Dynamics of Prefrontal Cognitive Control.

Authors:  Randolph F Helfrich; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Disruption in neural phase synchrony is related to identification of inattentional deafness in real-world setting.

Authors:  Daniel E Callan; Thibault Gateau; Gautier Durantin; Nicolas Gonthier; Frédéric Dehais
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 10.  Aberrant Modulation of Brain Oscillatory Activity and Attentional Impairment in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Authors:  Agatha Lenartowicz; Ali Mazaheri; Ole Jensen; Sandra K Loo
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-10-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.