Literature DB >> 27836435

Vaccine safety evaluation: Practical aspects in assessing benefits and risks.

Alberta Di Pasquale1, Paolo Bonanni2, Nathalie Garçon3, Lawrence R Stanberry4, Mostafa El-Hodhod5, Fernanda Tavares Da Silva6.   

Abstract

Vaccines are different from most medicines in that they are administered to large and mostly healthy populations including infants and children, so there is a low tolerance for potential risks or side-effects. In addition, the long-term benefits of immunisation in reducing or eliminating infectious diseases may induce complacency due to the absence of cases. However, as demonstrated in recent measles outbreaks in Europe and United States, reappearance of the disease occurs as soon as vaccine coverage falls. Unfounded vaccine scares such as those associating the combined measles-mumps-rubella vaccine with autism, and whole-cell pertussis vaccines with encephalopathy, can also have massive impacts, resulting in reduced vaccine uptake and disease resurgence. The safety assessment of vaccines is exhaustive and continuous; beginning with non-clinical evaluation of their individual components in terms of purity, stability and sterility, continuing throughout the clinical development phase and entire duration of use of the vaccine; including post-approval. The breadth and depth of safety assessments conducted at multiple levels by a range of independent organizations increases confidence in the rigour with which any potential risks or side-effects are investigated and managed. Industry, regulatory agencies, academia, the medical community and the general public all play a role in monitoring vaccine safety. Within these stakeholder groups, the healthcare professional and vaccine provider have key roles in the prevention, identification, investigation and management of adverse events following immunisation (AEFI). Guidelines and algorithms aid in determining whether AEFI may have been caused by the vaccine, or whether it is coincidental to it. Healthcare providers are encouraged to rigorously investigate AEFIs and to report them via local reporting processes. The ultimate objective for all parties is to ensure vaccines have a favourable benefit-risk profile. Copyright Â
© 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse event; Safety; Surveillance; Vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27836435     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  23 in total

1.  Extracellular vesicles of bacteria as potential targets for immune interventions.

Authors:  Yizhi Peng; Sheng Yin; Min Wang
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Need to take special care of non-responders to hepatitis B vaccination among health-care workers, students and chronic patients.

Authors:  Angela Bechini; Paolo Bonanni; Maddalena Grazzini; Diana Paolini; Giulio Arcangeli; Nicola Mucci; Costanza Bini; Emilia Tiscione; Beatrice Zanella; Sara Boccalini
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Tracking the progress in COVID-19 and vaccine safety research - a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in Scopus database.

Authors:  Tosin Yinka Akintunde; Shaojun Chen; Taha Hussein Musa; Felix Oluseyi Amoo; Adekunle Adedeji; Elhakim Ibrahim; Angwi Enow Tassang; Idriss Hussein Musa; Hassan Hussein Musa
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.526

4.  Adverse Events Following Immunization in Brazil: Age of Child and Vaccine-Associated Risk Analysis Using Logistic Regression.

Authors:  Sílvia R C Lopes; João L R Perin; Taiane S Prass; Sandra Maria D Carvalho; Sérgio C Lessa; José G Dórea
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  [Analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System in Brazil, 2014 to 2016Análisis del Sistema de Información de Vigilancia de Eventos Adversos Posvacunación en Brasil, 2014 a 2016].

Authors:  Flávia Caselli Pacheco; Carla Magda Allan Santos Domingues; Ana Goretti Kalume Maranhão; Sandra Maria Deotti Carvalho; Antonia Maria da Silva Teixeira; Rui Moreira Braz; Renata Cristina Freitas Rebelo; Dirce Bellezi Guilhem
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2018-02-28

6.  The Combination Vaccine Adjuvant System Alum/c-di-AMP Results in Quantitative and Qualitative Enhanced Immune Responses Post Immunization.

Authors:  Thomas Ebensen; Simon Delandre; Blair Prochnow; Carlos A Guzmán; Kai Schulze
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.293

7.  Multi-epitope-Based Vaccine Designed by Targeting Cytoadherence Proteins of Mycoplasma gallisepticum.

Authors:  Susithra Priyadarshni Mugunthan; Mani Chandra Harish
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-05-17

8.  Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices of Occupational Physicians towards seasonal influenza vaccination: a cross-sectional study from North-Eastern Italy.

Authors:  M Riccò; S Cattani; F Casagranda; G Gualerzi; C Signorelli
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2017-06

9.  Ten years of vaccinovigilance in Italy: an overview of the pharmacovigilance data from 2008 to 2017.

Authors:  F Moretti; L Gonella; S Gironi; A R Marra; C Santuccio; P Felicetti; F Petronzelli; P Marchione; S A Barnaba; A Poli; G Zanoni; U Moretti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Post-marketing surveillance of adverse events following measles, mumps, rubella and varicella (MMRV) vaccine: retrospecive study in apulia region (ITALY), 2009-2017.

Authors:  Pasquale Stefanizzi; Sara De Nitto; Francesco Patano; Francesco Paolo Bianchi; Davide Ferorelli; Paolo Stella; Domenica Ancona; Vito Bavaro; Silvio Tafuri
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.