| Literature DB >> 27835655 |
Norman Paege1, Sascha Jung1, Paul Schäpe1, Dirk Müller-Hagen1, Jean-Paul Ouedraogo1,2, Caroline Heiderich2, Johanna Jedamzick2, Benjamin M Nitsche1, Cees A van den Hondel2,3, Arthur F Ram2,3, Vera Meyer1,3.
Abstract
Understanding the genetic, molecular and evolutionary basis of cysteine-stabilized antifungal proteins (AFPs) from fungi is important for understanding whether their function is mainly defensive or associated with fungal growth and development. In the current study, a transcriptome meta-analysis of the Aspergillus niger γ-core protein AnAFP was performed to explore co-expressed genes and pathways, based on independent expression profiling microarrays covering 155 distinct cultivation conditions. This analysis uncovered that anafp displays a highly coordinated temporal and spatial transcriptional profile which is concomitant with key nutritional and developmental processes. Its expression profile coincides with early starvation response and parallels with genes involved in nutrient mobilization and autophagy. Using fluorescence- and luciferase reporter strains we demonstrated that the anafp promoter is active in highly vacuolated compartments and foraging hyphal cells during carbon starvation with CreA and FlbA, but not BrlA, as most likely regulators of anafp. A co-expression network analysis supported by luciferase-based reporter assays uncovered that anafp expression is embedded in several cellular processes including allorecognition, osmotic and oxidative stress survival, development, secondary metabolism and autophagy, and predicted StuA and VelC as additional regulators. The transcriptomic resources available for A. niger provide unparalleled resources to investigate the function of proteins. Our work illustrates how transcriptomic meta-analyses can lead to hypotheses regarding protein function and predict a role for AnAFP during slow growth, allorecognition, asexual development and nutrient recycling of A. niger and propose that it interacts with the autophagic machinery to enable these processes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27835655 PMCID: PMC5106034 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165755
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of AnAFP and AFP on selected fungi.
| Strain | MIC AnAFP (μg/ml) | MIC AFP (μg/ml) |
|---|---|---|
| > 50 | 1 | |
| 30 | > 400 | |
| NE | NE | |
| > 50 | 200 | |
| 1 | 1 | |
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| > 50 | NE |
*The maximum concentration of AnAFP which we could use for the MIC assay was 50 μg/ml as only limited amounts of AnAFP were obtainable from A. niger cultures.
§No complete growth inhibition was detected at concentrations of 400μg/ml.
#NE, no effect. Values are averages of triplicate experiments.
Fig 1Membrane permeabilization induced by AnAFP in A. niger.
The capability of AnAFP (100 μg/ml) to permeabilize the membranes of viable cells of A. niger, A. nidulans and F. oxysporum was monitored for 2 h of incubation. The fluorescence of the SYTOX Green dye was used as a measure of fungal cells with compromised membranes. Cells with intact membranes do not show a fluorescence signal. Data are averages of triplicate experiments.
Fig 2Expression levels of the anafp gene of A. niger strain N402 at different conditions.
Transcription levels of the anafp gene were analyzed when exposed to different A) carbon sources in shaking flask cultures [23] and B) to carbon limitation in batch, retentostat [27] and chemostat bioreactor cultures [28]. anafp transcription levels are also depicted for batch cultivations in bioreactors with ΔflbA and ΔbrlA mutants, respectively [33]. Samples have been taken at four time points: t1–t4, exponential growth phase, 16 h, 60 h, 140 h post carbon depletion. In C) mRNA levels at different zones of a plated culture are depicted [33, 34]. Whereas zone 1 (z1) marks the center of the colony consisting, i.e. the oldest part of the culture, zone 5 (z5) marks the colony’s periphery. Zone 3 lies in between. Absolute values of transcription levels are depicted as arbitrary units of fluorescence intensity in a logarithmic scale and can be assessed using the legend. Color intensities were normalized to the highest absolute transcription level which is indicated by black color.
Fig 3Analysis of anafp expression using a fluorescent reporter system.
A) Luciferase expression under control of the anafp promoter was measured in a ΔcreA strain (NP6.4) and the corresponding wild type control strain (PK2.9) during 4 days of cultivation in complete medium using microtiter plates. Protein abundance was measured as luminescent counts per second normalized to culture optical density. Data of a representative experiment (n = 4) are shown. B) eYFP expression under control of the anafp promoter was measured in a ΔcreA strain (NP2.8, grey) and the corresponding wild type control strain (PK1.22, black) after 3 days of incubation on a complete medium agar. Expression levels were normalized to that of the control strain and are depicted as mean of three independent experiments performed as duplicate. *, p<0.03.
Fig 4Fluorescence microscopic analysis of anafp promoter activity in reporter strain PK1.22.
A) Shown is the fluorescence micrograph (left) and the fluorescence bright field overlay of strain PK1.22. CM agar sandwiched between two glass slides was inoculated with spores of strain PK1.22. After incubation at 30°C for two days in a humidified environment, the culture was analyzed using fluorescence microscopy. B) Shown are fluorescent (left column) and corresponding bright-field micrographs (right column) of culture samples taken from retentostat bioreactor cultivations of strain PK1.22 during exponential growth phase at day 0 with growth rate μ = 0.24 h-1 and decreasing growth rates after the switch to the retentostat cultivation as indicated. The activity of the anafp promoter was followed by monitoring the green fluorescence signal of eYFP. Bar = 20 μm.
Fig 5Influence of salt and oxidative stress on anafp promoter activity using a luciferase reporter system.
A) Shown are the results of a representative cultivation experiment out of five using strain PK2.9 as reporter strain. Salt stress was induced 26 h after spore inoculation by addition of NaCl, KCl, CaCl2, MgCl2 and KH2PO4 at a final concentration of 100 mM (arrowhead). An untreated culture served as negative control. OD620 and luminescence (LCPS, luminescence counts per second) were measured periodically in order to detect anafp promoter activity. Note that salt addition also provoked a very immediate, sharp spike within seconds after addition, probably reflecting a transient cellular response which was not observed when simply water was added to the negative control. B) Shown are the results of a representative cultivation experiment of strain PK2.9 out of three. Oxidative stress was induced 26 h after spore inoculation by the addition of 5 mM H2O2 or 100 μM menadione, respectively (arrowhead). An untreated PK2.9 culture served as negative control. OD620 and luminescence (LCPS, luminescence counts per second) were measured periodically in order to detect anafp promoter activity.
Genes being positively correlated with anafp expression as inferred from 155 cultivation conditions.
| ORF and functional group | Predicted gene function | Spearman coefficient | |
|---|---|---|---|
| An05g00480 | similarity to transcription factor StuA– | 0.6 | |
| An04g07320 | similarity to velvet family transcription factor VelC– | 0.6 | |
| An16g06270 | similarity to versicolorin reductase VerA— | 0.65 | |
| An04g04340 | similarity to nonaketide synthase of the lovastatin biosynthesis LovB— | 0.5 | |
| An07g01200 | similarity to enoyl reductase of the lovastatin biosynthesis LovC— | 0.6 | |
| An09g01880 | similarity to enoyl reductase of the lovastatin biosynthesis LovC– | 0.65 | |
| An11g06440 | similarity to enoyl reductase of the lovastatin biosynthesis LovC– | 0.55 | |
| An16g01630 | similarity to enoyl reductase of the lovastatin biosynthesis LovC– | 0.5 | |
| An15g02130 | similarity to lovastatin diketide synthase LovF– | 0.65 | |
| An02g08570 | similarity to isopenicillin N acyltransferase AatA– | 0.55 | |
| An18g01180 | similarity to penicillin V amidohydrolase PVA— | 0.6 | |
| An03g06460 | similarity to sterigmatocystin biosynthesis p450 monooxygenase | 0.5 | |
| An01g14020 | similarity to sterigmatocystin synthesis transcription regulator | 0.5 | |
| An18g01200 | similarity to O-methylsterigmatocystin oxidoreductase Ord1 – | 0.55 | |
| An03g01460 | similarity to gibberellin 7-oxidase— | 0.55 | |
| An12g05380 | similarity to cercosporin transporter CFP— | 0.65 | |
| An02g13750 | similarity to glutaminase A GtaA involved in ochratoxin A biosynthesis– | 0.65 | |
| An01g06930 | similarity to polyketide synthase FUM5— | 0.6 | |
| An01g12050 | similarity to 15-decalonectrin 15-O-acetyltransferase TRI3 of the trichothecene pathway– | 0.55 | |
| An12g02490 | similarity to aflatoxin biosynthesis regulator AflR– | 0.55 | |
| An01g00680 | similarity to cytochrome P450 monooxygenase AvnA of the aflatoxin biosynthesis– | 0.5 | |
| An09g04010 | class III chitin synthase ChsB | 0.5 | |
| An02g02340 | class V chitin synthase CsmB | 0.5 | |
| An01g05360 | chitinase CfcD | 0.55 | |
| An01g06500 | α-1,6 mannanase DfgD | 0.5 | |
| An09g02180 | phospholipase A1 | 0.65 | |
| An16g03700 | similarity to phospholipase B– | 0.6 | |
| An16g01880 | similarity to lysophospholipase– | 0.6 | |
| An07g08980 | similarity to phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate 5-kinase Fab1 – | 0.55 | |
| An01g06830 | similarity to 3-ketosphinganine reductase Tsc10 – | 0.5 | |
| An01g09460 | similarity to plasma membrane sensor WscA– | 0.5 | |
| An03g04690 | similarity to osmosensor Sho1p – | 0.5 | |
| An04g07460 | similarity to pH sensor PalF– | 0.6 | |
| An01g06900 | similarity to activator of stress genes Asg1 – | 0.6 | |
| An16g00750 | similarity to transcription activator Cha4 – | 0.55 | |
| An04g06000 | similarity to transcription activator Put3 –S. cerevisiae, involved in proline utilization | 0.5 | |
| An05g00020 | similarity to transcription factor Oaf1 – | 0.5 | |
| An04g08620 | similarity to repressor Oaf3 – | 0.5 | |
| An01g13700 | similarity to transcription factor Crz1 – | 0.55 | |
| An18g03170 | similarity to cyclin-dependent kinase Pho85— | 0.5 | |
| An05g00190 | similarity to cyclin Pcl7 – | 0.5 | |
| An01g03330 | 0.6 | ||
| An08g05790 | similarity to glycogen phosphorylase Gph1 – | 0.55 | |
| An01g06120 | glycogen debranching enzyme GdbA | 0.5 | |
| An07g10020 | similarity to autophagy-related ubiquitin modifier Atg8 – | 0.5 | |
| An11g11320 | similarity to autophagy-related cysteine protease Atg4 – | 0.5 | |
| An11g05400 | similarity to metacaspase casA– | 0.6 | |
| An18g00980 | similarity to G-protein-coupled receptor protein PTH11— | 0.7 | |
| An13g01870 | similarity to G-protein-coupled receptor protein PTH11— | 0.7 | |
| An12g01300 | similarity to vegetative incompatibility protein tol— | 0.75 | |
| An15g04830 | similarity to vegetative incompatibility protein tol– | 0.55 | |
| An11g09180 | similarity to vegetative incompatibility protein tol— | 0.55 | |
| An12g02900 | similarity to heterokaryon incompatibility protein het-6— | 0.65 | |
| An07g04330 | similarity to heterokaryon incompatibility protein het-6— | 0.65 | |
| An08g09970 | similarity to beta-transducin-like protein het-e— | 0.6 | |
| An04g00900 | similarity to beta transducin-like protein het-e1 – | 0.6 | |
| An02g01260 | similarity to beta transducin-like protein het-e1 – | 0.55 | |
| An12g00850 | similarity to beta transducin-like protein het-e1 – | 0.5 | |
a: after [16], Aspergillus Genome Database (AspGD, [15]) and the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD, [61]).
Fig 6Jaccard orthologous clusters of multiple genomes.
Depicted are genome excerpts of different Aspergilli species comprising ±15 kb around the anafp gene locus. The anafp gene and its orthologues are marked by a dark grey ribbon, whereas all other orthologous gene clusters up- and downstream of the anafp gene are marked by light grey ribbons. Corresponding genes are marked with their locus names and are depicted as horizontal bars and arrows showing gene orientation. Horizontal axes on top of each genome excerpt show the relative localization on the chromosomes in mega bases.
Fig 7Species owning AnAFP orthologs within the Ascomycota tree of life.
Depicted is an excerpt of the Ascomyota tree of life according to Schoch et al., 2009 [64]. Species with AnAFP orthologs are listed according to their class. Corresponding superclasses are indicated by numbers 1–3. 1, Sordariomyceta; 2, Leotiomyceta; 3, Dothideomyceta. Numbers of species/genus are indicated in brackets. Dashed line represents the last common ancestor of the three superclasses.
Fig 8Alignment of primary and secondary structures of AnAFP orthologs.
Identified or proposed amino-acid sequences of mature proteins were aligned by CLUSTAL W. Names of corresponding organisms owning the orthologue are abbreviated using the first letter of genus name followed by the first three letters of the species name. Protein/GenBank accession numbers from UniProtKB, AspGD or NCBI, respectively, are indicated in brackets. Amino-acid sequences marked by asterisks were derived from an expressed sequence-tag database analysis. Though some of the listed mature proteins are identical (marked by square brackets), all of them differ at least in one amino acid when considering the pre-pro-regions as well. The overall conserved cysteine residues are highlighted by open boxes. Predicted γ-core motifs are highlighted by shaded boxes. Secondary structures derived from NMR solution structures of AFP [70] and PAF [71] and from a secondary structure prediction of AFP, PAF or AnAFP, respectively, are shown at the top. Secondary structure predictions have been calculated using the PredictProtein server [66] for all mature proteins. Blue arrows and capital E-letters on top depict positions of beta strands whereas lines mean loops or turns, respectively. Gaps are depicted by dots.
Aspergillus niger strains used in this work.
CH4.2 and CH4.9 are different transformant strains from the same transformation approach.
| Name | Relevant genotype | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| N402 | [ | |
| AB4.1 | [ | |
| MA169.4 | [ | |
| MA70.15 | [ | |
| MA78.6 | [ | |
| CH4.2 | this work | |
| CH4.9 | this work | |
| PK1.22 | this work | |
| PK2.9 | this work | |
| NP2.8 | this work | |
| NP3.2 | this work | |
| NP4.1 | this work | |
| XY1.1.1 | this work | |
| BN26.1 | [ | |
| BN34.2 | [ | |
| NP6.4 | this work |