Literature DB >> 27833517

Clinical Utility of Esophageal manometry in the patients with dysphagia - Experience from Sudan.

Amin M Abbas1, Sami Medani1, Tajeldin M Abdallah2, Gasim I Gasim3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical utility of esophageal manometry among Sudanese patients presenting to the National Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Ibn Sina Hospital, Khartoum, Sudan.
METHODOLOGY: Consecutive patients referred for esophageal manometry at the aforementioned center from July 2008 through January 2011 were included in the study. Manometric studies were done after stopping medicines with a known effect on esophageal motility and an overnight fast. Immediately before the manometric study, the patients' history and clinical examination were recorded using a structured questionnaire.
RESULTS: The major referral reason was the investigation of dysphagia in 78 patients (60.5%), followed by the evaluation of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in 39 patients (30%), while 11 patients (9%) were referred because of non-cardiac chest pain. The manometric diagnosis in the 78 patients with dysphagia, where 51(65.4%) had achalasia, 13(16.7%) had nonspecific motility disorder, the remaining percentage was formed by GERD diffuse esophageal spasm, connective tissue disease, Nutcracker esophagus, hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter, patient manometry suggestive of myasthenia gravis, and normal manometry.
CONCLUSION: GERD and Achalasia were the commonest conditions among the study group. Patients presenting with achalasia manifest the same clinical symptoms as published in the literature. The leading abnormality predisposing to GERD was hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter and weak esophageal clearance function. GERD was main cause of non-cardiac chest pain in the study population. However, it is difficult to generalize the findings of this study for the whole country since it was a single center study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GERD; Sudan; achalasia; esophageal manometry; non-cardiac chest pain

Year:  2016        PMID: 27833517      PMCID: PMC5085347     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)        ISSN: 1658-3639


  34 in total

Review 1.  Modern management of achalasia.

Authors:  Fouad J Moawad; Roy Kh Wong
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.287

Review 2.  AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Achalasia of the esophagus.

Authors:  O F Grimes; H B Stephens; A R Margulis
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Cost-utility of one-time colonoscopic screening for colorectal cancer at various ages.

Authors:  R M Ness; A M Holmes; R Klein; R Dittus
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Does this patient have oesophageal motility abnormality or pathological acid reflux?

Authors:  S N Hong; P-L Rhee; J H Kim; J H Lee; Y-H Kim; J J Kim; J C Rhee
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2005-04-18       Impact factor: 4.088

Review 6.  Endoscopic pneumatic dilation versus botulinum toxin injection in the management of primary achalasia.

Authors:  Jan E Leyden; Alan C Moss; Padraic MacMathuna
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-12-08

Review 7.  Current therapies for achalasia: comparison and efficacy.

Authors:  M F Vaezi; J E Richter
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.062

8.  Five year prospective study of the incidence, clinical features, and diagnosis of achalasia in Edinburgh.

Authors:  P J Howard; L Maher; A Pryde; E W Cameron; R C Heading
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Esophageal testing of patients with noncardiac chest pain or dysphagia. Results of three years' experience with 1161 patients.

Authors:  P O Katz; C B Dalton; J E Richter; W C Wu; D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Perception of esophageal manometry.

Authors:  M A Walamies
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.429

View more
  2 in total

1.  Spectrum and Clinical Outcome of Motility Disorders on High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry: A Study From a Tertiary Center on Patients With Dysphagia in Pakistan.

Authors:  Hareem Rehman; Adeel Abid; Safia Awan; Farheen L Hashmi; Shahab Abid
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-12-14

2.  Different patterns of esophageal motility disorders among patients with dysphagia and normal endoscopy: A 2-center experience.

Authors:  Mariam S Zaghloul; Yasmine A Elshaer; Mohamed E Ramadan; Hassan E ElBatae
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.