Literature DB >> 12060042

Perception of esophageal manometry.

M A Walamies1.   

Abstract

Esophageal manometry is an important investigation method but its direct impact on patients' well-being has not been studied. A structured questionnaire was given to all patients (n=92) after the manometry during one calendar year. The response rate was 91%. A total of seventy-one patients also reported their health status during the next 24 h. No serious side-effects were recorded. About half of the respondents regarded manometry as an easy or fairly easy investigation. The most common problems were irritation of nose and throat. In total, 48% of the respondents had mild to moderate late symptoms after manometry, usually soreness of the throat or nose lasting for some hours. The manometry was more troublesome to women than to men. It is concluded that esophageal manometry is generally a benign and fairly tolerated investigation, and the high level of anxiety that many patients show before the manometry is not well justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12060042     DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2050.2002.00224.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  4 in total

1.  Clinical Utility of Esophageal manometry in the patients with dysphagia - Experience from Sudan.

Authors:  Amin M Abbas; Sami Medani; Tajeldin M Abdallah; Gasim I Gasim
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2016-10

2.  High-resolution esophageal manometry: a time motion study.

Authors:  Daniel C Sadowski; Linda Broenink
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  Nasal pressure swings as the measure of inspiratory effort in spontaneously breathing patients with de novo acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Roberto Tonelli; Andrea Cortegiani; Lorenzo Ball; Enrico Clini; Alessandro Marchioni; Riccardo Fantini; Luca Tabbì; Ivana Castaniere; Emanuela Biagioni; Stefano Busani; Chiara Nani; Caterina Cerbone; Morgana Vermi; Filippo Gozzi; Giulia Bruzzi; Linda Manicardi; Maria Rosaria Pellegrino; Bianca Beghè; Massimo Girardis; Paolo Pelosi; Cesare Gregoretti
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 4.  Different Methods to Improve the Monitoring of Noninvasive Respiratory Support of Patients with Severe Pneumonia/ARDS Due to COVID-19: An Update.

Authors:  Paolo Pelosi; Roberto Tonelli; Chiara Torregiani; Elisa Baratella; Marco Confalonieri; Denise Battaglini; Alessandro Marchioni; Paola Confalonieri; Enrico Clini; Francesco Salton; Barbara Ruaro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.