Literature DB >> 27829705

Large grain instruction and phonological awareness skill influence rime sensitivity, processing speed, and early decoding skill in adult L2 learners.

Christine Brennan1, James R Booth2.   

Abstract

Linguistic knowledge, cognitive ability, and instruction influence how adults acquire a second orthography yet it remains unclear how different forms of instruction influence grain size sensitivity and subsequent decoding skill and speed. Thirty-seven monolingual, literate English-speaking adults were trained on a novel artificial orthography given initial instruction that directed attention to either large or small grain size units (i.e., words or letters). We examined how initial instruction influenced processing speed (i.e., reaction time (RT)) and sensitivity to different orthographic grain sizes (i.e., rimes and letters). Directing attention to large grain size units during initial instruction resulted in higher accuracy for rimes, whereas directing attention to smaller grain size units resulted in slower RTs across all measures. Additionally, phonological awareness skill modulated early learning effects, compensating for the limitations of the initial instruction provided. Collectively, these findings suggest that when adults are learning to read a second orthography, consideration should be given to how initial instruction directs attention to different grain sizes and inherent phonological awareness ability.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 27829705      PMCID: PMC5098455          DOI: 10.1007/s11145-015-9555-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Read Writ        ISSN: 0922-4777


  8 in total

1.  Alphabetical knowledge from whole words training: effects of explicit instruction and implicit experience on learning script segmentation.

Authors:  T Bitan; A Karni
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-05

Review 2.  Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics.

Authors:  G C Van Orden; B F Pennington; G O Stone
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Paul A Luce
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-08

4.  Subsyllabic units in computerized reading instruction: onset-rime vs. postvowel segmentation.

Authors:  B W Wise; R K Olson; R Treiman
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1990-02

5.  Investigating the role of instructional focus in incidental pattern learning.

Authors:  Timothy J Nokes; Ivan K Ash
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

Review 6.  Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory.

Authors:  Johannes C Ziegler; Usha Goswami
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Effects of alphabeticality, practice and type of instruction on reading an artificial script: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Tali Bitan; David Manor; Istvan A Morocz; Avi Karni
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-09

8.  Procedural and declarative knowledge of word recognition and letter decoding in reading an artificial script.

Authors:  T Bitan; A Karni
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-05
  8 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  The role of phonology during visual word learning in adults: An integrative review.

Authors:  Gabriela Meade
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-02

2.  Spoken words activate native and non-native letter-to-sound mappings: Evidence from eye tracking.

Authors:  Viorica Marian; James Bartolotti; Natalia L Daniel; Sayuri Hayakawa
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Parietotemporal Stimulation Affects Acquisition of Novel Grapheme-Phoneme Mappings in Adult Readers.

Authors:  Jessica W Younger; James R Booth
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.