Literature DB >> 15944143

Effects of alphabeticality, practice and type of instruction on reading an artificial script: an fMRI study.

Tali Bitan1, David Manor, Istvan A Morocz, Avi Karni.   

Abstract

In neuroimaging studies of word reading in natural scripts, the effect of alphabeticality is often confounded with the effect of practice. We used an artificial script to separately manipulate the effects of practice and alphabeticality following training with and without explicit letter instructions. Participants received multi-session training in reading nonsense words, written in an artificial script, wherein each phoneme was represented by 2 discrete symbols . Three training conditions were compared: alphabetical whole words with letter decoding instruction (explicit); alphabetical whole-words (implicit) and non-alphabetical whole-words (arbitrary). Each participant was trained on the arbitrary condition and on one of the alphabetical conditions (explicit or implicit). fMRI scans were acquired after training during reading of trained words and relatively novel words in the alphabetical and arbitrary conditions. Our results showed greater activation in the explicit compared to the arbitrary conditions, but only for relatively-novel words, in the left posterior inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). In the implicit condition, the left posterior IFG was active in both trained and relatively novel words. These results indicate the involvement of the left posterior IFG in letter decoding, and suggest that reading of explicitly well-trained words did not rely on letter decoding, while in implicitly trained words letter decoding persisted into later stages. The superior parietal lobules showed reduced activation for items that received more practice, across all training conditions. Altogether, our results suggest that the alphabeticality of the word, the amount of practice and type of instructions have independent and interacting effects on brain activation during reading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15944143     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  14 in total

Review 1.  A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading.

Authors:  Cathy J Price
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Large grain instruction and phonological awareness skill influence rime sensitivity, processing speed, and early decoding skill in adult L2 learners.

Authors:  Christine Brennan; James R Booth
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2015-02-26

3.  Using Artificial Orthographies for Studying Cross-Linguistic Differences in the Cognitive and Neural Profiles of Reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hirshorn; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 1.710

4.  Development of visual expertise for reading: rapid emergence of visual familiarity for an artificial script.

Authors:  Urs Maurer; Vera C Blau; Yuliya N Yoncheva; Bruce D McCandliss
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Attentional focus during learning impacts N170 ERP responses to an artificial script.

Authors:  Yuliya N Yoncheva; Vera C Blau; Urs Maurer; Bruce D McCandliss
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  A test of the role of the medial temporal lobe in single-word decoding.

Authors:  Karol Osipowicz; Tyler Rickards; Atif Shah; Ashwini Sharan; Michael Sperling; Waseem Kahn; Joseph Tracy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Phonetically irregular word pronunciation and cortical thickness in the adult brain.

Authors:  Karen Blackmon; William B Barr; Ruben Kuzniecky; Jonathan Dubois; Chad Carlson; Brian T Quinn; Mark Blumberg; Eric Halgren; Donald J Hagler; Mark Mikhly; Orrin Devinsky; Carrie R McDonald; Anders M Dale; Thomas Thesen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Unimodal and multimodal regions for logographic language processing in left ventral occipitotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Yuan Deng; Qiuyan Wu; Xuchu Weng
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  No childhood advantage in the acquisition of skill in using an artificial language rule.

Authors:  Sara Ferman; Avi Karni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Can the error detection mechanism benefit from training the working memory? A comparison between dyslexics and controls--an ERP study.

Authors:  Tzipi Horowitz-Kraus; Zvia Breznitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.