| Literature DB >> 27829416 |
Amalia Di Petrillo1, Ana Maria González-Paramás2, Benedetta Era1, Rosaria Medda1, Francesca Pintus3, Celestino Santos-Buelga2, Antonella Fais1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Asphodelus microcarpus belongs to the family Liliaceae that include several medicinal plants. In the traditional medicine plants of the genus Asphodelus are used to treat skin disorders such as ectodermal parasites, psoriasis, microbial infection and for lightening freckles. In order to find novel skin depigmenting agents, the present work was carry out to evaluate antioxidant activity and tyrosinase inhibitory potential of leaves, flowers and tubers extracts of A. microcarpus. The phytochemical composition of the active extract was also evaluated.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidants; Asphodelus microcarpus; B16F10 melanoma cells; Flavonoids; Polyphenols; Tyrosinase inhibitors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27829416 PMCID: PMC5103440 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-1442-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Free radical-scavenging content of A. microcarpus extracts
| Extracts | IC50 values (μg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ABTS scavenging | DPPH scavenging | ||
| Leaves | Aqueous | 174.35 ± 7.99e | 134.75 ± 7.85b |
| Ethanolic | 74.5 ± 7.77b | 55.9 ± 1.55a | |
| Methanolic | 131.1 ± 1.27d | 140.85 ± 0.49b | |
| Flowers | Aqueous | 126.4 ± 5.09c | 108 ± 2.83b |
| Ethanolic | 33.1 ± 1.55a | 28.4 ± 0.85a | |
| Methanolic | 107.6 ± 1.27de | 113.25 ± 1.77b | |
| Tubers | Aqueous | 720.45 ± 13.5h | 670.4 ± 27.72e |
| Ethanolic | 257.75 ± 10.96f | 360 ± 56.57c | |
| Methanolic | 680.25 ± 14.35g | 579 ± 29.7d | |
| Trolox | 3.4 ± 0.3 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | |
Note: The results are expressed as IC50 values (μg/mL). The data are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of triplicate experiments. The statistical comparison between values from the different plant extracts applied using the post hoc Duncan test. Means followed by distinct letters in the same column were found to be significantly different (p < 0.05)
Polyphenol and flavonoid content in leaves, flowers and roots extracts from A. microcarpus
| Extracts | Total polyphenols(*) | Flavonoids(**) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leaves | Aqueous | 36.83 ± 0.6d | 5.90 ± 2.52c |
| Ethanolic | 54.44 ± 13.6e | 31.13 ± 1.96g | |
| Methanolic | 35.48 ± 0.4d | 17.27 ± 1.28e | |
| Flowers | Aqueous | 36.58 ± 1.2d | 3.33 ± 0.41b |
| Ethanolic | 68.62 ± 9.8f | 27.28 ± 2.33f | |
| Methanolic | 26.37 ± 1.2c | 11.43 ± 1.07d | |
| Tubers | Aqueous | 5.10 ± 0.5a | 1.99 ± 0.42ab |
| Ethanolic | 39.35 ± 4.2d | 1.4 ± 0.33a | |
| Methanolic | 15.31 ± 7.8b | 3.94 ± 1.05b | |
Data are expressed as mean of three measurements ± standard deviation
(*) mg GAE/g of dry weight
(**) mg QE/g of dry weight
Note: The data are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of triplicate experiments. The statistical comparison between values from the different plant extracts applied using the post hoc Duncan test. Means followed by distinct letters in the same column were found to be significantly different (p < 0.05)
Inhibition of tyrosinase by A. microcarpus extracts
| Extracts | % Inhibition at 0.2 mg/mL | |
|---|---|---|
| Leaves | Aqueous | 9.85 ± 0.21b |
| Ethanolic | 29.9 ± 0.14d | |
| Methanolic | 20.4 ± 1.4c | |
| Flowers | Aqueous | 6.55 ± 0.21b |
| Ethanolic | 40.25 ± 4.4e | |
| Methanolic | 13.9 ± 2.4b | |
| Tubers | Aqueous | 10.65 ± 1.34b |
| Ethanolic | 8.4 ± 1.3b | |
| Methanolic | 2.25 ± 1a | |
| Kojic Acid | 97.4 ± 2.8 | |
Note: The data are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of triplicate experiments. The statistical comparison between values from the different plant extracts applied using the post hoc Duncan test. Means followed by distinct letters in the same column were found to be significantly different (p < 0.05)
Fig. 1Inhibition of tyrosinase activity by A. microcarpus flowers extract. a Lineweaver-Burk plot for inhibition of ethanol extract on mushroom tyrosinase activity using l-DOPA as substrate. Reaction mixtures contained mushroom tyrosinase in 25 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) and l-DOPA, in the absence or presence of extract at different extract concentrations. b Replot of the 1 ⁄Vmax values versus extract concentration
Fig. 2Effect of A. microcarpus flowers extract on cell viability in B16F10 melanoma cells. After 48 h incubation with FEE, cell viability was determined by MTT assay. Data are expressed as mean ± SD from three independent experiments
Fig. 3Effect of flowers extract on B16F10 melanoma cells. Tyrosinase activity (a) and melanin production (b) are expressed as percentage of the control and the effects of FEE were compared with Kojic acid as standard inhibitor
Fig. 4Effect of flowers extract on B16F10 cells by L-DOPA staining. Tyrosinase activity was estimated by zymography (a) and the relative intensity of bands was determined with ImageJ software (b)
Fig. 5HPLC chromatogram of FEE recorded at 330 nm for phenolic compounds. Peak identification is given in Table 4
Identification of polyphenolic compounds in A. microcarpus flowers ethanolic extract by HPLC-DAD-ESI/MS analysis
| Peak | Rt (min) | λmax (nm) | Pseudomolecular ion [M-H]− ( | MS2 ( | Tentative identification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.9 | 326 | 353 | 191 (100) | 3- |
| 353 (94) | |||||
| 179 (71) | |||||
| 135 (48) | |||||
| 173 (9) | |||||
| 2 | 8.3 | 326 | 353 | 191 (100) | 5- |
| 3 | 15.4 | 346 | 447 | 447 (100) | Luteolin-6- |
| 357 (98) | |||||
| 327 (97) | |||||
| 285 (25) | |||||
| 429 (20) | |||||
| 4 | 19 | 340 | 447 | 447 (100) | Luteolin- |
| 285 (40) | |||||
| 5 | 21.5 | 338 | 447 | 285 (100) | Luteolin-7- |
| 6 | 23.9 | 338 | 489 | 285 (100) | Luteolin |
| 7 | 26.8 | 345 | 285 | 285 (100) | Luteolin |
| 8 | 27.9 | 324 | 593 | 285 (100) | Luteolin |
| 9 | 29.9 | 288 | 271 | 151 (100) | Naringenin |
| 119 (56) | |||||
| 10 | 30.2 | 338 | 269 | 269 (100) | Apigenin |
| 151 (36) | |||||
| 11 | 30.8 | 348 | 299 | 300 (100) | Methyl-luteolin |
| 285 (88) |