| Literature DB >> 27822200 |
Changwon Jang1, Hae-Jeong Park2, Won Seok Chang3, Chongwon Pae1, Jin Woo Chang3.
Abstract
Thalamotomy at the ventralis intermedius nucleus has been an effective treatment method for essential tremor, but how the brain network changes immediately responding to this deliberate lesion and then reorganizes afterwards are not clear. Taking advantage of a non-cranium-opening MRI-guided focused ultrasound ablation technique, we investigated functional network changes due to a focal lesion. To classify the diverse time courses of those network changes with respect to symptom-related long-lasting treatment effects and symptom-unrelated transient effects, we applied graph-theoretic analyses to longitudinal resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data before and 1 day, 7 days, and 3 months after thalamotomy with essential tremor. We found reduced average connections among the motor-related areas, reduced connectivity between substantia nigra and external globus pallidum and reduced total connection in the thalamus after thalamotomy, which are all associated with clinical rating scales. The average connectivity among whole brain regions and inter-hemispheric network asymmetry show symptom-unrelated transient increases, indicating temporary reconfiguration of the whole brain network. In summary, thalamotomy regulates interactions over the motor network via symptom-related connectivity changes but accompanies transient, symptom-unrelated diaschisis in the global brain network. This study suggests the significance of longitudinal network analysis, combined with minimal-invasive treatment techniques, in understanding time-dependent diaschisis in the brain network due to a focal lesion.Entities:
Keywords: brain network; connectivity; diaschisis; essential tremor; thalamotomy
Year: 2016 PMID: 27822200 PMCID: PMC5076435 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1Lesion locations in T2-weighted images and fMRI echo planar images after MRgFUS thalamotomy in two patients. The target lesion is the left ventralis intermedius nucleus (Vim) of the thalamus (arrow). The temperature of the target region was increased until reaching a minimum 55°C, creating a lesion for each patient. op + 1d, op + 7d, and op + 3m indicate 1 day, 7 days, and 3 months after treatment, respectively.
Figure 2Procedures for network analyses in the whole brain network (A) and motor subnetwork (B). The whole brain network is composed of 110 nodes in the cerebral cortex. Cross-correlation and partial cross-correlation of the time series across all nodes compose functional connectivity (FC) and partial-correlation functional connectivity (pFC) matrices at four time points: op − 1d, op + 1d, op + 7d, and op + 3m (1 day before operation, 1 day after operation, 7 days after operation, and 3 months after operation, respectively). The same procedure for functional network analysis was done within the motor subnetwork (B), except for structure–function coupling. The motor subnetwork includes the precentral gyrus, supplementary motor areas (SMA), putamen, thalamus, external globus pallidum, internal globus pallidum, subthalamic nucleus, substantia nigra, and red nucleus in the left hemisphere, and right dentate nucleus in the cerebellum.
Demographic data (CRST A scores for right hand).
| ID | Sex | Age | Pre 1 day | Post 7 days | Post 3 months | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Postural | Action | Postural | Action | Postural | Action | |||
| 1 | M | 78 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 2 | M | 63 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | M | 69 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 4 | M | 61 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 5 | M | 61 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | M | 67 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 7 | M | 68 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | F | 63 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Figure 3Behavioral results. CRST A action scores (A) and CRST A posture scores (B). Repeated-measures ANOVA for both scores were significant session effects (p < 0.001). The numbers over the line indicate p-values for post hoc analysis.
Figure 4Functional connectivity (FC) of motor subnetwork according to session. op − 1d, op + 1d, op + 7d, and op + 3m indicate 1 day before operation, 1 day after operation, 7 days after operation, and 3 months after operation, respectively. Edges that passed the criteria of FDR q < 0.05 are displayed. PrcG, precentral gyrus; SMA, supplementary motor area; Thal, thalamus; Put, putamen; RN, red nucleus; GPe, external globus pallidum; GPi, internal globus pallidum; STN, subthalamic nucleus; SN, substantia nigra, in the left hemisphere; and rDT, right dentate nucleus in the cerebellum.
Figure 5Results of motor-tremor subnetwork analysis. (A) Connectivity strengths (transformed to Z) between the left substantia nigra (SN) and left external globus pallidum (GPe). (B) Connectivity strengths between the right substantia nigra and right external globus pallidum. (C) Node degree in the left thalamus. (D) Average node degree in the motor-tremor network had significant session effect (p = 0.021) and CRST A posture score effect (p = 0.003). (E) The average node strength had a significant treatment effect (p = 0.027), a significant posture score effect (p = 0.036) and a tendency of action score effect (p = 0.054). (F) Global efficiency in the left motor-tremor network had a session effect (p = 0.033), CRST A posture score effect (p = 0.008), and CRST A action score effect (p = 0.0124). The numbers over the line indicate p-values for post hoc analysis. AS, CRST A action score; PS, CRST A posture score.
Figure 6Whole brain network analysis results. (A) An exemplary display of network changes in the whole brain functional network of a patient (S6). (B) The average node strength over positive pFC network. (C) The inter-hemispheric similarity in partial-correlation functional connectivity matrix (pFC). (D) The path-length at the planum polare over FC. (E) The path-length at the lateral inferior occipital cortex over pFC. The numbers over the line indicate p-values for post hoc analysis. (F) Locations of the planum polare and the lateral inferior occipital cortex.
Statistical result of network properties.
| Target | Longitudinal changes | Correlation with CRST A scores (mixed effect model analysis) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repeated-measures ANOVA | op − 1d | op + 1d | op + 7d | op + 3m | Action | Posture | |||
| Behavior | CRST A score (action) | 2.87 (0.64) | – | 0.87 (0.83) | 0.87 (0.99) | op − 1d > op + 7d: | – | – | |
| op − 1d > op + 3m: | |||||||||
| CRST A score (posture) | 2.25 (0.71) | – | 0.37 (0.74) | 0.63 (0.74) | op − 1d > op + 7d: | – | – | ||
| op − 1d > op + 3m: | |||||||||
| Motor-tremor network | Left GPe-SN | 2.01 (1.11) | 0.95 (1.40) | 0.97 (2.19) | 3.02 (1.47) | op + 1d < op + 3m: | |||
| op + 7d < op + 3m: | |||||||||
| Right GPe-SN | 1.39 (1.24) | −0.25 (1.07) | 1.76 (1.55) | 2.81 (2.06) | op − 1d > op + 1d: | N.S. | N.S. | ||
| op + 1d < op + 3m: | |||||||||
| op + 1d < op + 7d: | |||||||||
| Average node degree | 3.88 (1.72) | 2.33 (0.83) | 2.48 (1.68) | 2.95 (1.08) | op − 1d > op + 1d: | N.S. | |||
| op − 1d > op + 7d: | |||||||||
| Average node strength | 1.09 (0.48) | 0.68 (0.20) | 0.84 (0.52) | 0.93 (0.34) | op − 1d > op + 1d: | ||||
| Global efficiency | 0.17 (0.05) | 0.12 (0.04) | 0.12 (0.07) | 0.14 (0.06) | op − 1d > op + 1d: | ||||
| op − 1d > op + 7d: | |||||||||
| Node degree of left thalamus | N.S. | 5.25 (1.83) | 3.88 (1.55) | 3.38 (2.33) | 4.13 (1.46) | – | |||
| Whole brain network | Inter-hemispheric similarity of pFC | 0.43 (0.081) | 0.48 (0.062) | 0.48 (0.059) | 0.47 (0.060) | op − 1d < op + 1d: | N.S. | N.S. | |
| op − 1d < op + 7d: | |||||||||
| Average strength of pFC | 0.1565 (0.0044) | 0.1506 (0.0056) | 0.1571 (0.0055) | 0.1559 (0.0030) | op − 1d > op + 1d: | N.S. | N.S. | ||
| op + 1d < op + 3m: | |||||||||
| Path-length of left planum polare in FC | 4.05 (0.92) | 5.10 (1.19) | 4.05 (0.57) | 3.93 (0.90) | op − 1d < op + 1d: | N.S. | N.S. | ||
| op + 1d > op + 7d: | |||||||||
| op + 1d > op + 3m: | |||||||||
| Path-length of right lateral inferior occipital cortex in pFC | 19.01 (1.65) | 21.80 (1.26) | 18.30 (1.36) | 18.78 (1.77) | op − 1d < op + 1d: | N.S. | N.S. | ||
| op + 1d > op + 7d: | |||||||||
| Op + 1d > Op + 3m: | |||||||||
GPe, external globus pallidum; SN, substantia nigra; N.S., not significant; FC, functional connectivity-based on Pearson correlation; pFC, partial-correlation functional connectivity. Values in the op − 1d, op + 1d, op + 7d, and op + 3m indicate mean and SDs.