OBJECTIVE: To compare outcome in Essential Tremor (ET) patients who have undergone either thalamotomy or Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the thalamus. BACKGROUND: Although both thalamotomy and thalamic DBS are effective surgical treatments of tremor, it is not known if one procedure is superior to the other. DESIGN/ METHODS: Thirty-five ET patients underwent thalamotomy between 1994-1998. Data on 18 patients were excluded. The remaining 17 patients were matched for age, sex, side of surgery, and tremor severity to 17 ET patients who underwent thalamic DBS. There were nine men and eight women in each group. The mean age of the thalamotomy group was 74.4 years and that of the thalamic DBS group was 73.1 years. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between any efficacy outcome variables comparing thalamotomy to DBS of the thalamus at baseline or follow-up visits. The surgical complications were higher for the thalamotomy group as compared to the DBS group. However, a larger number of DBS patients underwent repeat surgeries due to problems with the device and the leads. CONCLUSION: Although the efficacy is similar for thalamotomy and DBS of the thalamus for ET, thalamotomy is associated with a higher complication rate. DBS of the thalamus should be the procedure of choice for the surgical treatment of ET in most cases.
OBJECTIVE: To compare outcome in Essential Tremor (ET) patients who have undergone either thalamotomy or Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the thalamus. BACKGROUND: Although both thalamotomy and thalamic DBS are effective surgical treatments of tremor, it is not known if one procedure is superior to the other. DESIGN/ METHODS: Thirty-five ET patients underwent thalamotomy between 1994-1998. Data on 18 patients were excluded. The remaining 17 patients were matched for age, sex, side of surgery, and tremor severity to 17 ET patients who underwent thalamic DBS. There were nine men and eight women in each group. The mean age of the thalamotomy group was 74.4 years and that of the thalamic DBS group was 73.1 years. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between any efficacy outcome variables comparing thalamotomy to DBS of the thalamus at baseline or follow-up visits. The surgical complications were higher for the thalamotomy group as compared to the DBS group. However, a larger number of DBS patients underwent repeat surgeries due to problems with the device and the leads. CONCLUSION: Although the efficacy is similar for thalamotomy and DBS of the thalamus for ET, thalamotomy is associated with a higher complication rate. DBS of the thalamus should be the procedure of choice for the surgical treatment of ET in most cases.
Authors: Terence Verla; Andrew Marky; Harrison Farber; Frank W Petraglia; John Gallis; Yuliya Lokhnygina; Beth Parente; Patrick Hickey; Dennis A Turner; Shivanand P Lad Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2015-02-07 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Atchar Sudhyadhom; Frank J Bova; Kelly D Foote; Christian A Rosado; Lindsey Kirsch-Darrow; Michael S Okun Journal: Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 5.081
Authors: Aaron E Bond; Binit B Shah; Diane S Huss; Robert F Dallapiazza; Amy Warren; Madaline B Harrison; Scott A Sperling; Xin-Qun Wang; Ryder Gwinn; Jennie Witt; Susie Ro; W Jeffrey Elias Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Tristan M Stani; Kim J Burchiel; Melanie J Hart; David P Lenar; Valerie C Anderson Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2009-10-21 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Matthew F DiFrancesco; Casey H Halpern; Howard H Hurtig; Gordon H Baltuch; Gregory G Heuer Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Kelly E Lyons; Rajesh Pahwa; Cynthia L Comella; Mahmood S Eisa; Rodger J Elble; Stanley Fahn; Joseph Jankovic; Jorge L Juncos; William C Koller; William G Ondo; Kapil D Sethi; Matthew B Stern; Caroline M Tanner; Ron Tintner; Ray L Watts Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2003 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Mario Zappia; Alberto Albanese; Elisa Bruno; Carlo Colosimo; Graziella Filippini; Paolo Martinelli; Alessandra Nicoletti; Graziella Quattrocchi; Giovanni Abbruzzese; Alfredo Berardelli; Roberta Allegra; Maria Stella Aniello; Antonio E Elia; Davide Martino; Daniela Murgia; Marina Picillo; Giovanna Squintani Journal: J Neurol Date: 2012-08-11 Impact factor: 4.849