| Literature DB >> 27819753 |
Salvador Vilar Correia Lima1, Marcilio Romero Machado2, Flávia Cristina Morone Pinto1, Mariana Montenegro de Melo Lira3, Amanda Vasconcelos de Albuquerque4, Eugênio Soares Lustosa2, Jaiurte Gomes Martins da Silva1, Olávio Campos5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To validate the application of the bacterial cellulose (BC) membrane as a protecting bar-rier to the urethra.Entities:
Keywords: Biocompatible Materials; Urethra; Urinary Incontinence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 27819753 PMCID: PMC5433374 DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0271
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Braz J Urol ISSN: 1677-5538 Impact factor: 1.541
Figure 1The urethral wall was measured in the lamina propria to the outer limit of the muscular layer according with the image. The area was divided in four quadrants to obtain the average of 20 measurements for each animal, making up 5 measurements in each of them.
Urethral Wall and Urothelium Height.
| Wall Height (mm) | Sham | Bacterial Cellulose | Silicone | BC + Sil. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Follow-up | 4 montds | 8 montds | 4 montds | 8 montds | 4 montds | 8 montds | 4 montds | 8 montds |
| Urethral | 0.40±0.07 | 0.51±0.15 | 0.51±0.08 | 0.53±0.10 b | 0.58±0.12 | 0.41±0.10 | 0.50±0.14 | 0.37±0.11 d,f |
| Urothelium | 0.041±0.003 | 0.045±0.001 | 0.041±0.003 | 0.030±0.001 a,b | 0.034±0.002 | 0.051±0.002 | 0.024±0.001d,e,f | 0.033±0.003 d,e,f |
Values expressed as Mean±SD. Student's t test significant if p≤0.05, to aBC≠Sham; bBC≠Silicone; cSilicone≠Sham; dBC≠BC+Sil.; eSilicone≠BC+Sil; fBC+Sil.≠Sham.
NA=Not applicable, BC=Bacterial Cellulose; Sil.=Silicone. Urethral wall p-value b=0.0249; d=0.0020; f=0.0414.
Urothelium height p-value at 4 months: b=0.058; d=0.0009; e=0.0103; f=0.0037 and at 8 months: a=0.0001; b<0.0001; d=0.3446; e=0.0020; f=0.0108.
Density of Blood Vessels in the implant area.
| Density (µm2) | Sham | Bacterial Cellulose | Silicone | BC + Sil. | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||
| Follow-up | 4 months | 8 months | 4 months | 8 months | 4 months | 8 months | 4 months | 8 months | ||
|
| ||||||||||
| BC | Sil. | BC | Sil. | |||||||
| Vasculogenesis | 1.90±0.36 | 2.27±0.43 | 4.44±0.57a,b | 4.93±0.13b | 0.53±0.34 | 1.60±0.55c | 5.76±0.12f | 0.68±0.37 d,e,f | 2.48±0.10f | 1.04±0.43 d,e,f |
Values expressed as Mean±SD. Mann Whitney test, significant if p≤0.05, to aBC≠Sham; bBC≠Silicone; cSilicone≠Sham; dBC≠BC+Sil.; eSilicone≠BC+Sil; fBC+Sil.≠Sham.
NA=Not applicable. BC: Bacterial Cellulose; Sil.: Silicone. Vasculogenesis p-value at 4 months: a0.0159; b0.0357; f0.0159 for BC; d0.0079; e0.0357; f0.0032 for Sil. and at 8 months: b0.0571; c0.0286; f0.0159 for BC and d0.0357; e0.0159; f0.0317 for Sil.
The intensity of the inflammatory reaction.
| Scores (%) | Sham | BC | Sil | BC + Sil. | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||
| Follow-up (months) | 4 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 4 months | 8 months | ||
|
| ||||||||||
| BC | Sil. | BC | Sil. | |||||||
|
| 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 100 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 100 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 20 | 100 | 33 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 20 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 0 | 80 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| p value | a0.0044 b0.0154 | a0.0143 b0.0455 | f0.0076 | f<0.0001 | f0.0078 | f<0.0001 | ||||
Values expressed as percentage (%). Chi-square test, significant if p≤0.05, to aBC≠Sham; bBC≠Silicone; cSilicone≠Sham; dBC≠BC+Sil.; eSilicone≠BC+Sil; fBC+Sil.≠Sham. NA=Not applicable. BC= Bacterial Cellulose; Sil.= Silicone.
Figure 2Photomicrography of the implant-tissue interface. A) Bacterial Cellulose group and B) Silicone group after 8 months. (∆) BC) (∆) Area where the silicon implant had occupied; (→) Blood Vessels; (→) vascular congestion; (→) inflammatory cells. Staining with hematoxylin and eosin. Note: Silicone implants did not resist the histological processing, for that reason the area appears as an empty space.
Figure 3Rats urethra photomicrograph cross section showing bacterial cellulose plus silicon implant after 4 months (A) and after 8 months (B). (∆) Area where the silicon implant had occupied; (∆) bacterial cellulose implants. Staining with hematoxylin and eosin (10X). Note: Silicone implants did not resist the histological processing, for that reason the area appears as an empty space
Deposition of the Collagen in Periurethral area.
| Scores (%) | Sham | BC | Sil | BC + Sil. | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||
| Follow-up (months) | 4 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 4 months | 8 months | ||
|
| ||||||||||
| BC | Sil. | BC | Sil. | |||||||
|
| NA | NA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 |
|
| 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Values expressed as percentage (%). Chi-square test, significant if p≤0.05, to aBC≠Sham; bBC≠Silicone; cSilicone≠Sham; dBC≠BC+Sil.; eSilicone≠BC+Sil; fBC+Sil.≠Sham. NA=Not applicable. BC: Bacterial Cellulose; Sil: Silicone.
Figure 4Photomicrography of collagen deposition in bacterial cellulose implants (A) and silicone implants (B), both after 8 months. Masson’s Trichrome Staining Protocol for Collagen Fibers (20X). *Thick collagen fibers. Note: Silicone implants did not resist the histological processing, for that reason the area appears as an empty space