| Literature DB >> 27818488 |
Ruoyun Xie1, Ying Xu2, Shuixiu Fan3, Yanfeng Song3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) brings major health issues for women, affecting 40% of postmenopausal women, and directly affects bladder and bowel function, as well as quality of life. In light of the projected growth in demand for care for pelvic floor disorders, determining the etiology and progression of POP has important public health implications. MATERIAL AND METHODS Uterosacral ligaments (USLs) samples of POP patients and normal controls were enrolled for RNA-Seq, and functional annotation analysis and Protein-Protein interaction (PPI) networks construction were performed for differentially expressed genes (DEGs). RESULTS A total of 81 DEGs were identified between POP and normal control, and distinctly classify all samples into normal and POP group by hierarchical clustering. Sixty-six DEGs demonstrated the same expression pattern among the POP samples with different stages. For those DEGs, canonical Wnt receptor signaling pathway was the most significantly enriched GO term (P value=3.33E-07), and neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction was the most significantly enriched pathway (P value=1.24E-03). In The PPI networks of 81 dysregulated genes, significant hub proteins contained TOP2A (Degree=54), KCNA5 (Degree=22) and PLA2G2A (Degree=19), suggesting their important role in the development of POP. CONCLUSIONS This RNA-seq analysis identified a POP signature of 81 genes, and some ECM-related genes, including COMP, NDP, and SNAI2 might participate in the pathology of POP and be applied as potential therapeutic targets.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27818488 PMCID: PMC5110227 DOI: 10.12659/msm.900224
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
RNA-Seq results.
| Sample | Total reads | Mapped reads | Uniq reads | Mapped rate | Uniq rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 1.89E+07 | 1.73E+07 | 1.64E+07 | 91.58% | 86.65% |
| Stage II | 2.19E+07 | 2.01E+07 | 1.90E+07 | 91.78% | 86.89% |
| Stage III | 2.10E+07 | 1.93E+07 | 1.82E+07 | 91.57% | 86.58% |
| Stage IV | 2.25E+07 | 2.04E+07 | 1.94E+07 | 90.94% | 86.21% |
Figure 1The heat map of significantly up- or down-regulated genes in the stage II, III, and IV in comparison with the normal USLs.
Figure 2A,BGO analysis of DEGs in terms of biological processes in POP stage II and stage III. (A) Stage II; (B) Stage III.
Figure 3The PPI networks of 81 dysregulated genes in USLs tissues of POP.