F Gadea1, L Favard2, P Boileau3, C Cuny4, T d'Ollone3, D Saragaglia5, F Sirveaux6. 1. Département d'orthopédie-traumatologie I, hôpital Trousseau, université François-Rabelais de Tours, avenue de la République, 37044 Tours cedex 9, France. Electronic address: gadea.f@gmail.com. 2. Département d'orthopédie-traumatologie I, hôpital Trousseau, université François-Rabelais de Tours, avenue de la République, 37044 Tours cedex 9, France. 3. Département de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologie du sport, hôpital de L'Archet, université de Nice-Sophia-Antipolis, 151, route de Saint-Antoine-de-Ginestière, 06202 Nice, France. 4. Département de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologie, hôpital Bon-Secours, CHR Metz, 57038 Metz cedex, France. 5. Service de chirurgie orthopédique et de traumatologie du sport, hôpital Sud, CHU de Grenoble, 38434 Échirolles cedex, France. 6. Centre chirurgical Émile-Gallé, 49, rue Hermite, 54000 Nancy, France.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: No objective criteria exist to help surgeons choose between IM nailing and plate fixation for 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus. The goal of this study was to identify radiological criteria that would make one technique a better choice than the other. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a comparative, multicentre, retrospective study of 54 cases of antegrade nailing and 53 cases of plating performed between 1st January 2009 and 31 December 2011 for 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus. All patients had a minimum radiological and clinical follow-up of 18 months. The functional outcomes were evaluated using the weighted Constant score; a poor result was defined as a weighted Constant score<70%. The following radiological criteria were evaluated during the preoperative assessment and at the last follow-up: initial displacement and reduction of humeral head and tuberosities; morphology of the medial column (i.e. calcar comminution, posteromedial hinge, size of metaphyseal head extension); occurrence of avascular necrosis (AVN). RESULTS: After an average follow-up of 42 months, the weighted Constant scores and rate of poor outcomes were 77% and 48% in the nail group and 81% and 38% in the plate group, respectively (ns). The humeral head was reduced into an anatomical position, valgus or varus in 57%, 30% and 13% of cases in the nail group, and 58%, 29% and 13% in the plate group, respectively. The tuberosities healed in an anatomical position in 72% of nail cases and 70% of plate cases (ns). Only the presence of a medial hinge preoperatively had an effect on the functional outcomes in the nail and plate groups: the weighted Constant scores (P=0.05) and rate of poor outcomes (P=0.02) were 82% and 52% in the nail group and 97% and 9% in the plate group, respectively. The complication rates were comparable: the rates of AVN and articular screw penetration were 17% and 11% in the nail group, and 15% and 11% in the plate group, respectively. The surgical revision rate was 18.5% in the nail group and 30% in the plate group. CONCLUSION: If the medial hinge is preserved, we recommend locking plate fixation. In other cases, either technique can be used as long as the general rules of internal fixation are applied: reduction of the tuberosities, varus correction and stabilization of the calcar area. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study. Copyright Â
INTRODUCTION: No objective criteria exist to help surgeons choose between IM nailing and plate fixation for 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus. The goal of this study was to identify radiological criteria that would make one technique a better choice than the other. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a comparative, multicentre, retrospective study of 54 cases of antegrade nailing and 53 cases of plating performed between 1st January 2009 and 31 December 2011 for 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus. All patients had a minimum radiological and clinical follow-up of 18 months. The functional outcomes were evaluated using the weighted Constant score; a poor result was defined as a weighted Constant score<70%. The following radiological criteria were evaluated during the preoperative assessment and at the last follow-up: initial displacement and reduction of humeral head and tuberosities; morphology of the medial column (i.e. calcar comminution, posteromedial hinge, size of metaphyseal head extension); occurrence of avascular necrosis (AVN). RESULTS: After an average follow-up of 42 months, the weighted Constant scores and rate of poor outcomes were 77% and 48% in the nail group and 81% and 38% in the plate group, respectively (ns). The humeral head was reduced into an anatomical position, valgus or varus in 57%, 30% and 13% of cases in the nail group, and 58%, 29% and 13% in the plate group, respectively. The tuberosities healed in an anatomical position in 72% of nail cases and 70% of plate cases (ns). Only the presence of a medial hinge preoperatively had an effect on the functional outcomes in the nail and plate groups: the weighted Constant scores (P=0.05) and rate of poor outcomes (P=0.02) were 82% and 52% in the nail group and 97% and 9% in the plate group, respectively. The complication rates were comparable: the rates of AVN and articular screw penetration were 17% and 11% in the nail group, and 15% and 11% in the plate group, respectively. The surgical revision rate was 18.5% in the nail group and 30% in the plate group. CONCLUSION: If the medial hinge is preserved, we recommend locking plate fixation. In other cases, either technique can be used as long as the general rules of internal fixation are applied: reduction of the tuberosities, varus correction and stabilization of the calcar area. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study. Copyright Â
Authors: Sjur Oppebøen; Annette K B Wikerøy; Hendrik F S Fuglesang; Filip C Dolatowski; Per-Henrik Randsborg Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 2.359