Literature DB >> 34554308

Displaced three and four part proximal humeral fractures: prospective controlled randomized open-label two-arm study comparing intramedullary nailing and locking plate.

Patrick Boyer1, Camille Couffignal2, Mohammad Bahman3, Guy Mylle4, Marc-Antoine Rousseau1, Ruben Dukan5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was (1) to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures using either IMN or LP (2) and to report complications related to each technique.
METHODS: A prospective controlled randomized open-label two-arm study was performed. Ninety-nine consecutive adult patients with a 3- and 4-part displaced acute proximal humeral fractures were randomized to be treated with IMN (n = 49) or LP (n = 50). Constant, ASES and SST scores were recorded by the surgeon. Range of motion was evaluated. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess shoulder pain. Complications and revision surgeries were reported.
RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were analyzed, nine were lost, and five died during the follow-up period. The mean age was 73.7 years (± 13.3,, and the mean follow-up was 66 months (± 13.5). At last follow-up, VAS was lower in the IMN group (0.9 (± 1.1) vs. 1.9 (± 1.7), p = 0.001). The median Constant score was significantly higher in the IMN group (81.6 (± 10.9) points) vs. in the LP group (75.6 (± 19.5) points) (p = 0.043), and ASES score was also significantly higher in the IMN group (86.3 (± 9.5) vs. 75.2 (± 19.6), p = 0.001). There was no difference in the range of motion or SST scores between the two groups. Complications were seen higher in the LP group (9 (21%) vs. 22 (52%), p = 0.003). Revision surgery was higher in the LP group (37% vs. 21%).
CONCLUSION: Satisfactory results were accomplished in both groups according to the reported clinical outcomes. Complication and revision rates were higher in LP group.
© 2021. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fracture; Humerus; Nail; Necrosis; Plate

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34554308     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05217-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  26 in total

1.  Complex fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly--outcome and complications after locking plate fixation.

Authors:  B Schliemann; J Siemoneit; Ch Theisen; C Kösters; A Weimann; M J Raschke
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2012-05

2.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute fractures in the elderly: is it worth reattaching the tuberosities?

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Tjarco D Alta; Lauryl Decroocq; François Sirveaux; Philippe Clavert; Luc Favard; Mikaël Chelli
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 3.  Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review.

Authors:  Charles M Court-Brown; Ben Caesar
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Surgical Technique for Open Reduction-Internal Fixation of an Unstable Displaced 3-Part Proximal Humeral Fracture Using a Proximal Humeral Locking Plate.

Authors:  Wichan Kanchanatawan; Sunikom Suppauksorn; Thanapon Chobpenthai; Worawit Densiri-Aksorn; Warongporn Pongpinyopap; Gem Dorjiee
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-06-19

5.  Fixation of 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus: Can we identify radiological criteria that support locking plates or IM nailing? Comparative, retrospective study of 107 cases.

Authors:  F Gadea; L Favard; P Boileau; C Cuny; T d'Ollone; D Saragaglia; F Sirveaux
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.256

6.  Burden of proximal humerus fractures in the French National Hospital Database.

Authors:  M Maravic; K Briot; C Roux
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.256

7.  Research Pearls: The Significance of Statistics and Perils of Pooling. Part 1: Clinical Versus Statistical Significance.

Authors:  Joshua D Harris; Jefferson C Brand; Mark P Cote; Scott C Faucett; Aman Dhawan
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Surgical vs nonsurgical treatment of adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: the PROFHER randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Amar Rangan; Helen Handoll; Stephen Brealey; Laura Jefferson; Ada Keding; Belen Corbacho Martin; Lorna Goodchild; Ling-Hsiang Chuang; Catherine Hewitt; David Torgerson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures managed in a trauma center.

Authors:  A Roux; L Decroocq; S El Batti; N Bonnevialle; G Moineau; C Trojani; P Boileau; F de Peretti
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.256

10.  Mid-term results of a less-invasive locking plate fixation method for proximal humeral fractures: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Benjamin Bockmann; Benjamin Buecking; Daniel Franz; Ralph Zettl; Steffen Ruchholtz; Juliane Mohr
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults.

Authors:  Helen Hg Handoll; Joanne Elliott; Theis M Thillemann; Patricia Aluko; Stig Brorson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-06-21

Review 2.  Different treatments for 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly patients: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jiale Guo; Caiju Peng; Ziyan Hu; Yehai Li
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.