Jennifer L Wolff1, Yue Guan2, Cynthia M Boyd3, Judith Vick4, Halima Amjad5, David L Roth6, Laura N Gitlin7, Debra L Roter8. 1. Department of Health Policy and Management and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 North Broadway, Room 692, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States; Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Mason F. Lord Center Tower, Baltimore, MD 21224-2734, United States; Center on Aging and Health, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 2024 E. Monument Street, Suite 2-700, Baltimore, MD 21205-2223, United States; Center for Innovative Care in Aging, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 N. Wolfe Street, Suite 316, Baltimore, MD 21205-2110, United States. Electronic address: jwolff2@jhu.edu. 2. Program in Personalized & Genomic Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 685 W. Baltimore St., MSTF 3-14D, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States. Electronic address: yguan@medicine.umaryland.edu. 3. Department of Health Policy and Management and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 North Broadway, Room 692, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States; Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Mason F. Lord Center Tower, Baltimore, MD 21224-2734, United States; Center on Aging and Health, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 2024 E. Monument Street, Suite 2-700, Baltimore, MD 21205-2223, United States; Center for Innovative Care in Aging, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 N. Wolfe Street, Suite 316, Baltimore, MD 21205-2110, United States. Electronic address: cyboyd@jhmi.edu. 4. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Edward D. Miller Research Building, 733 North Broadway, Suite 137, Baltimore, MD 21205-2196, United States. 5. Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Mason F. Lord Center Tower, Baltimore, MD 21224-2734, United States; Center on Aging and Health, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 2024 E. Monument Street, Suite 2-700, Baltimore, MD 21205-2223, United States; Center for Innovative Care in Aging, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 N. Wolfe Street, Suite 316, Baltimore, MD 21205-2110, United States. Electronic address: hamjad1@jhmi.edu. 6. Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Mason F. Lord Center Tower, Baltimore, MD 21224-2734, United States; Center on Aging and Health, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 2024 E. Monument Street, Suite 2-700, Baltimore, MD 21205-2223, United States; Center for Innovative Care in Aging, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 N. Wolfe Street, Suite 316, Baltimore, MD 21205-2110, United States. Electronic address: droth@jhu.edu. 7. Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Mason F. Lord Center Tower, Baltimore, MD 21224-2734, United States; Center on Aging and Health, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 2024 E. Monument Street, Suite 2-700, Baltimore, MD 21205-2223, United States; Center for Innovative Care in Aging, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 N. Wolfe Street, Suite 316, Baltimore, MD 21205-2110, United States. Electronic address: lgitlin1@jhu.edu. 8. Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 North Broadway, Room 750, Baltimore, MD 21205205, United States. Electronic address: droter@jhsph.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Older adults commonly involve family (broadly defined) in their care. We examined communication behaviors of family companions during older adults' primary care visits, including whether these behaviors vary with respect to how older adults manage their health, preferences for involving family in medical decision-making, and ratings of companion helpfulness. METHODS: Analysis of audio-taped primary care visits of older patients who were accompanied by a family companion (n=30 dyads) and linked patient surveys. RESULTS: Family companions predominantly facilitated doctor and patient information exchange. More than half of companion communication behaviors were directed at improving doctor understanding of the patient. Companions were more verbally active during visits of patients who delegated the management of their health to others than visits of patients who co-managed or self-managed their health. Companions were rated as more helpful by patients who preferred active involvement of family in medical decision-making. CONCLUSION: Family companion participation and helpfulness in primary care communication varies by patients' preferences for involving family in medical decision-making and approach to manage their health. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Research to examine the effects of clarifying patient and family companion expectations for primary care visits could inform strategies to improve the patient-centeredness of medical communication.
OBJECTIVE: Older adults commonly involve family (broadly defined) in their care. We examined communication behaviors of family companions during older adults' primary care visits, including whether these behaviors vary with respect to how older adults manage their health, preferences for involving family in medical decision-making, and ratings of companion helpfulness. METHODS: Analysis of audio-taped primary care visits of older patients who were accompanied by a family companion (n=30 dyads) and linked patient surveys. RESULTS: Family companions predominantly facilitated doctor and patient information exchange. More than half of companion communication behaviors were directed at improving doctor understanding of the patient. Companions were more verbally active during visits of patients who delegated the management of their health to others than visits of patients who co-managed or self-managed their health. Companions were rated as more helpful by patients who preferred active involvement of family in medical decision-making. CONCLUSION: Family companion participation and helpfulness in primary care communication varies by patients' preferences for involving family in medical decision-making and approach to manage their health. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Research to examine the effects of clarifying patient and family companion expectations for primary care visits could inform strategies to improve the patient-centeredness of medical communication.
Authors: Gabriela S Hobbs; Mary Beth Landrum; Neeraj K Arora; Patricia A Ganz; Michelle van Ryn; Jane C Weeks; Jennifer W Mack; Nancy L Keating Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Annette M O'Connor; John E Wennberg; France Legare; Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas; Benjamin W Moulton; Karen R Sepucha; Andrea G Sodano; Jaime S King Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2007 May-Jun Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Erin R Giovannetti; Lisa Reider; Jennifer L Wolff; Kevin D Frick; Chad Boult; Don Steinwachs; Cynthia M Boyd Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2013-08-26 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: Margaret L Longacre; Marcin Chwistek; Molly Collins; Michelle Odelberg; Mark Siemon; Cynthia Keleher; Carolyn Y Fang Journal: Cancer Care Res Online Date: 2021-12
Authors: Katherine Treiman; Elissa C Kranzler; Rebecca Moultrie; Laura Arena; Nicole Mack; Erica Fortune; Reese Garcia; Richard L Street Journal: J Patient Exp Date: 2022-04-21
Authors: Joan M Griffin; Catherine Riffin; Lauren R Bangerter; Karen Schaepe; Rachel D Havyer Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 3.734