BACKGROUND: Older adults are commonly accompanied to routine medical visits. Whether and how family companion behaviours relate to visit processes is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To examine family companion behaviours in relation to older adults' medical visit processes. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational study of 78 accompanied primary care patients ages 65 and older. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medical visit communication (coded using RIAS), patient verbal activity (as a proportion of visit statements) and visit duration (in min), from audio recordings. RESULTS: Companions' facilitation of patient involvement was associated with greater patient question asking (P = 0.017) and orienting statements, less passive agreement (P = 0.004) and social talk (P = 0.013) and visits that were 3.4 min longer (P = 0.025). Facilitation of patient understanding was associated with less physician question asking (P = 0.004), visits that were 3.0 min longer (P = 0.031), and lower patient verbal activity (30.3% vs. 36.9% of visit statements; P = 0.028). Facilitation of doctor understanding was associated with greater patient biomedical information giving (P = 0.049). Autonomy detracting behaviours were not associated with visit duration but were associated with lower levels of patient verbal activity (36.3% vs. 29.1% of visit statements; P = 0.041). When companions assumed more behaviours, medical visits were incrementally longer (16.1, 19.5, 21.7 min, corresponding to 0-1, 2-4 and 5+ behaviours; P < 0.001 both contrasts), and patients were less verbally active (35.6%, 33.9%, 27.1% of visit statements; P = 0.09 and P = 0.009, respectively). DISCUSSION: Behaviours assumed by patients' companions were associated with visit communication, patient verbal activity and visit duration. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to capitalize on family companions' presence may benefit medical visit processes.
BACKGROUND: Older adults are commonly accompanied to routine medical visits. Whether and how family companion behaviours relate to visit processes is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To examine family companion behaviours in relation to older adults' medical visit processes. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational study of 78 accompanied primary care patients ages 65 and older. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medical visit communication (coded using RIAS), patient verbal activity (as a proportion of visit statements) and visit duration (in min), from audio recordings. RESULTS: Companions' facilitation of patient involvement was associated with greater patient question asking (P = 0.017) and orienting statements, less passive agreement (P = 0.004) and social talk (P = 0.013) and visits that were 3.4 min longer (P = 0.025). Facilitation of patient understanding was associated with less physician question asking (P = 0.004), visits that were 3.0 min longer (P = 0.031), and lower patient verbal activity (30.3% vs. 36.9% of visit statements; P = 0.028). Facilitation of doctor understanding was associated with greater patient biomedical information giving (P = 0.049). Autonomy detracting behaviours were not associated with visit duration but were associated with lower levels of patient verbal activity (36.3% vs. 29.1% of visit statements; P = 0.041). When companions assumed more behaviours, medical visits were incrementally longer (16.1, 19.5, 21.7 min, corresponding to 0-1, 2-4 and 5+ behaviours; P < 0.001 both contrasts), and patients were less verbally active (35.6%, 33.9%, 27.1% of visit statements; P = 0.09 and P = 0.009, respectively). DISCUSSION: Behaviours assumed by patients' companions were associated with visit communication, patient verbal activity and visit duration. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to capitalize on family companions' presence may benefit medical visit processes.
Authors: France Légaré; Dawn Stacey; Sophie Pouliot; François-Pierre Gauvin; Sophie Desroches; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Sandy Dunn; Glyn Elwyn; Dominick Frosch; Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Margaret B Harrison; Pierre Pluye; Ian D Graham Journal: J Interprof Care Date: 2010-08-26 Impact factor: 2.338
Authors: Jennifer L Wolff; Yue Guan; Cynthia M Boyd; Judith Vick; Halima Amjad; David L Roth; Laura N Gitlin; Debra L Roter Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2016-10-25
Authors: Mathilde Mastebroek; Jenneken Naaldenberg; Francine A van den Driessen Mareeuw; Geraline L Leusink; Antoine Lm Lagro-Janssen; Henny Mj van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Crystal W Cené; Beth Haymore; Jeffrey P Laux; Feng-Chang Lin; Dana Carthron; Debra Roter; Lisa A Cooper; Patricia P Chang; Brian C Jensen; Paula F Miller; Giselle Corbie-Smith Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2016-09-03
Authors: Margaret L Longacre; Marcin Chwistek; Molly Collins; Michelle Odelberg; Mark Siemon; Cynthia Keleher; Carolyn Y Fang Journal: Cancer Care Res Online Date: 2021-12