Literature DB >> 27812814

[Robotics in the operating room : Out of the niche into widespread application].

J Kirchberg1, T Mees2, J Weitz2.   

Abstract

In the last few years robotic surgery has progressed from being confined to a small niche to a widespread application in routine visceral surgery; however, evidence for superiority of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopy from randomized studies with a sufficient number of patients is still lacking in most fields of visceral surgery. For complex operations that necessitate an extensive reconstruction phase, such as pancreatectomy, gastrectomy and esophagectomy, there is a potential benefit for the permanent and justified use of robotic surgery. Even in operations where delicate nerve preparation and radical surgical resection are simultaneously necessary, such as rectal resection, robotic surgery may provide certain benefits. In the long term there is a great potential for the integration of innovative techniques, such as navigation or other medical imaging procedures into robotic surgery, which can currently only partially be estimated. Care must be taken to avoid premature euphoria; however, due to the assumed great potential there is an urgent need for randomized studies to evaluate the possible benefits of robotic surgical techniques in visceral surgery in order to generate evidence for the welfare of patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automatic data processing; Medical device; Robotic surgical procedures; Standardization; Visceral surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27812814     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-016-0313-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  49 in total

1.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy: technique and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; Chung Ngai Tang; Michael K W Li
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 6.071

2.  Use, cost, complications, and mortality of robotic versus nonrobotic general surgery procedures based on a nationwide database.

Authors:  Muhammad Salman; Theodore Bell; Jennifer Martin; Kalpesh Bhuva; Rod Grim; Vanita Ahuja
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  [First national survey on use of robotics for visceral surgery in Germany].

Authors:  H J Kissler; A Bauschke; U Settmacher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Randomized clinical trial of standard laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  W A Draaisma; J P Ruurda; R C H Scheffer; R K J Simmermacher; H G Gooszen; H G Rijnhart-de Jong; E Buskens; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Robotic right colon resection: evaluation of first 50 consecutive cases for malignant disease.

Authors:  Annibale D'Annibale; Graziano Pernazza; Emilio Morpurgo; Igor Monsellato; Vito Pende; Giorgio Lucandri; Barbara Termini; Camillo Orsini; Gianna Sovernigo
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008.

Authors:  Joseph F Buell; Daniel Cherqui; David A Geller; Nicholas O'Rourke; David Iannitti; Ibrahim Dagher; Alan J Koffron; Mark Thomas; Brice Gayet; Ho Seong Han; Go Wakabayashi; Giulio Belli; Hironori Kaneko; Chen-Guo Ker; Olivier Scatton; Alexis Laurent; Eddie K Abdalla; Prosanto Chaudhury; Erik Dutson; Clark Gamblin; Michael D'Angelica; David Nagorney; Giuliano Testa; Daniel Labow; Derrik Manas; Ronnie T Poon; Heidi Nelson; Robert Martin; Bryan Clary; Wright C Pinson; John Martinie; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Robert Goldstein; Sasan Roayaie; David Barlet; Joseph Espat; Michael Abecassis; Myrddin Rees; Yuman Fong; Kelly M McMasters; Christoph Broelsch; Ron Busuttil; Jacques Belghiti; Steven Strasberg; Ravi S Chari
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  [Robotic Pancreatic Surgery].

Authors:  J Kirchberg; J Weitz
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 0.942

10.  Robotic versus Endoscopic Thyroidectomy for Thyroid Cancers: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Early Postoperative Outcomes and Surgical Learning Curves.

Authors:  Jandee Lee; Jong Ho Yun; Un Jong Choi; Sang-Wook Kang; Jong Ju Jeong; Woong Youn Chung
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 4.375

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Standardized access options for colorectal surgery with the da Vinci Xi system].

Authors:  D Perez; A Woestemeier; T Ghadban; H Stein; M Gomez-Ruiz; J R Izbicki; B Soh Min
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Minimally invasive robotic versus conventional open living donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Ulrich Pein; Matthias Girndt; Silke Markau; Annekathrin Fritz; Alberto Breda; Michael Stöckle; Nasreldin Mohammed; Felix Kawan; Andre Schumann; Paolo Fornara; Karl Weigand
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 4.226

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.