Literature DB >> 17058295

Randomized clinical trial of standard laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

W A Draaisma1, J P Ruurda, R C H Scheffer, R K J Simmermacher, H G Gooszen, H G Rijnhart-de Jong, E Buskens, I A M J Broeders.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic systems for minimally invasive surgery may be of added value during extensive dissection and suturing in confined spaces, such as laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF). The purpose of this trial was to compare standard LNF with robot-assisted Nissen fundoplication (RNF).
METHODS: Between 2003 and 2005, 50 patients with confirmed refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were assigned to LNF (25) or RNF (25). Patients who had undergone previous antireflux surgery were excluded. Independent assessment of dysphagia, regurgitation, heartburn and general well-being was performed before and 6 months after surgery using questionnaires. Objective outcome was studied 6 months after surgery by oesophageal manometry, 24-h pH monitoring, barium oesophagram series and upper endoscopy.
RESULTS: Operating time, blood loss, postoperative pain scores, hospital stay and complication rates did not differ significantly between the two groups. Reoperation rates were the same (one incisional hernia after LNF and one patient with repeat Nissen after RNF because of persistent dysphagia). Postoperative self-rated change in reflux symptoms and quality of life improved equally in both groups. The reduction in oesophageal acid exposure, increase in lower oesophageal sphincter tone and mucosal healing were comparable in both groups at follow-up.
CONCLUSION: RNF yielded similar subjective and objective results to LNF in this study. Therefore no additive value of robotic systems for this procedure was detected up to 6 months after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17058295     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  31 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; William W Hope; Geoffrey P Kohn; Patrick R Reardon; William S Richardson; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Robotic general surgery: current practice, evidence, and perspective.

Authors:  M Jung; P Morel; L Buehler; N C Buchs; M E Hagen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  The end of robot-assisted laparoscopy? A critical appraisal of scientific evidence on the use of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Jeroen Heemskerk; Nicole D Bouvy; Cor G M I Baeten
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Early robotic experience with paraesophageal hernia repair and Nissen fundoplication: short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Ward J Dunnican; T Paul Singh; Gloria G Guptill; Michael G Doorly; Ashar Ata
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-03-29

5.  Role of robotic-assisted surgery in benign esophageal diseases.

Authors:  Shireesh Saurabh; Eric Unger; Julie Grossman; Francisco Couto; Namrata Singh; David Scott Lind; Lucian Panait; Andres Castellanos
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-08-15

6.  Robot-assisted gastroesophageal surgery: usefulness and limitations.

Authors:  Ismael Diez Del Val; Cándido Martinez Blazquez; Carlos Loureiro Gonzalez; Jose Maria Vitores Lopez; Valentin Sierra Esteban; Julen Barrenetxea Asua; Izaskun Del Hoyo Aretxabala; Patricia Perez de Villarreal; Jose Esteban Bilbao Axpe; Jaime Jesus Mendez Martin
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-09-14

7.  European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery.

Authors:  Amir Szold; Roberto Bergamaschi; Ivo Broeders; Jenny Dankelman; Antonello Forgione; Thomas Langø; Andreas Melzer; Yoav Mintz; Salvador Morales-Conde; Michael Rhodes; Richard Satava; Chung-Ngai Tang; Ramon Vilallonga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  SAGES TAVAC safety and effectiveness analysis: da Vinci ® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA).

Authors:  Shawn Tsuda; Dmitry Oleynikov; Jon Gould; Dan Azagury; Bryan Sandler; Matthew Hutter; Sharona Ross; Eric Haas; Fred Brody; Richard Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Morbidity and mortality in complex robot-assisted hiatal hernia surgery: 7-year experience in a high-volume center.

Authors:  Alexander C Mertens; Rob C Tolboom; Hana Zavrtanik; Werner A Draaisma; Ivo A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Robotic kidney implantation for kidney transplantation: initial experience.

Authors:  Monika E Hagen; Francois Pugin; Pascal Bucher; Jean Fasel; Sheraz Markar; Philippe Morel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-10-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.