| Literature DB >> 27812461 |
Alexander M Schenzel1, Christopher Klein2, Kai Rist3, Norbert Moszner3, Christopher Barner-Kowollik1.
Abstract
Here, the development of an adhesive is reported - generated via free radical polymerization - which can be degraded upon thermal impact within minutes. The degradation is based on a stimuli responsive moiety (SRM) that is incorporated into the network. The selected SRM is a hetero Diels-Alder (HDA) moiety that features three key properties. First, the adhesive can be degraded at relatively low temperatures (≈80 °C), second the degradation occurs very rapidly (less than 3 min), and third, the degradation of the network can readily be analyzed and quantified due to its self-reporting nature. The new reversible self-reporting adhesion system is characterized in detail starting from molecular studies of the retro HDA reaction. Moreover, the mechanical properties of the network, as well as the adhesion forces, are investigated in detail and compared to common methacrylate-based systems, demonstrating a significant decrease in mechanic stability at elevated temperatures. The current study thus represents a significant advance of the current state of the art for debonding on demand adhesives, making the system interesting for several fields of application including dental adhesives.Entities:
Keywords: degradable networks; hetero Diels–Alder chemistry; polymer chemistry; self‐reporting materials
Year: 2016 PMID: 27812461 PMCID: PMC5067662 DOI: 10.1002/advs.201500361
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Figure 1A self‐reporting degradable polymeric network including spectroscopic and visual analysis. a) Schematic display of the degradation of the network upon heating. b) Display of the retro HDA reaction that occurs upon heating and the defined structures of the DiHDA‐core and ‐linker (the DiHDA‐core was used for temperature dependent studies in solution in order to avoid any self‐polymerization). The self‐reporting nature stems from the generated dithioester formed upon heating. c) HT‐NMR spectroscopic analysis of the DiHDA‐core in toluene‐d8 at 25, 70, 100, and 120 °C. d) Evidence of the color change upon heating at 25 °C (0%*), 70 °C (34%*), 100 °C (93%*), and 120 °C (100%*). e) UV–Vis spectroscopic analysis of the DiHDA‐core in solution and a cured network of the DiHDA‐linker (99.8% DiHDA‐linker + 0.2% Ivocerin) between 25 and 140 °C.** f) Kinetic investigation of the retro HDA reaction of a cured network of the DiHDA‐linker (99.8% DiHDA‐linker + 0.2% Ivocerin) at 100 °C. *Amount of retro HDA product. **The intensity of the maxima at 330 nm (DiHDA‐core) and 535 nm (DiHDA‐linker) is observed at a given temperature and correlated to the extent of the retro HDA reaction. For the DiHDA‐core, the absorption at 330 nm was chosen as the absorption at 535 nm was weak, due to poor solubility.
Figure 2Analysis of the mechanical network properties. a) Comparison of the storage modulus (G′) of a degradable network (99.8% DiHDA‐linker + 0.2% Ivocerin) and a typical nondegradable polymeric network (99.8% UDMA + 0.2% Ivocerin) for the temperature range of 25–130 °C. b) Comparison of G′ of a degradable copolymer network (iBoMA + 0.2 equation DiHDA‐linker) and a typical nondegradable copolymer network (iBoMA + 0.2 equation D3MA*) for the temperature range of 30–130 °C. c) Display of a degradable network (99.8% DiHDA‐linker + 0.2% Ivocerin). At ambient temperature, the network is rigid and cannot be bend (i). At 100 °C, the network can easily be bended by using tweezers (ii) and cut into pieces (iii). * 1,10‐Decandiol dimethacrylate.
Figure 3Analysis of the adhesion strength. a) Display of the employed test abutment and crown (for detailed information, refer to the Supporting Information). b) Display of the experimental setup for the pull‐off tests. A water bath was used for temperature control. c) Comparison of the pull‐off forces of a dental model adhesive comonomer system (nBMA + 0.2 equation bisGMA*) and a mixture including the designed DiHDA‐linker (nBMA + 0.2 equation DiHDA‐linker) at 23 and 80 °C (left part) as well as the calculated differences between the ratios of the pull‐off forces at 23 and 80 °C for both systems (right part). For exact values, refer to the Supporting Information. * Bisphenol‐A‐glycidyl methacrylate.