Literature DB >> 27810160

Immature oocyte retrieval and in vitro oocyte maturation at different phases of the menstrual cycle in women with cancer who require urgent gonadotoxic treatment.

Helene Creux1, Patricia Monnier2, Weon-Young Son3, Togas Tulandi3, William Buckett3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and the efficacy of in vitro maturation (IVM) when immature oocyte collection was performed in the early follicular, late follicular, or luteal phases in women with cancer who require urgent chemotherapy.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENT(S): One-hundred and sixty-four women with cancer undergoing IVM treatment for fertility preservation. INTERVENTION(S): Oocyte retrieval, IVM, cryopreservation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Medians (interquartile range) of oocytes collected, maturation rates after 48 hours of culture, and metaphase II oocytes cryopreserved. RESULT(S): The analysis included a total of 192 cycles grouped into early follicular phase (n = 46), late follicular phase (n = 107), or luteal phase (n = 39). Embryo cryopreservation was performed in 82 cycles, and oocyte cryopreservation in 105 cycles. Between the early follicular, late follicular, and luteal phases, no statistically significant differences were found in the number of oocytes collected (8.5 [4-15.8], 8 [5-14], and 7 [4-9], respectively), the maturation rates after 48 hours of culture (53.5% [39.8-77], 58% [44-82], and 50% [33-67], respectively), or the number of oocytes cryopreserved (3 [0-7.3], 3 [0-7], and 3 [1-5.5], respectively). Similarly, the fertilization rates (77 [62.8-92.5], 75 [60-100], and 63.5 [50-75], respectively) and number of embryos cryopreserved (3 [2-5.8], 3 [0.5-5], and 2 [1-3], respectively) were not statistically significantly different among the groups. CONCLUSION(S): Our study confirms the feasibility of IVM collection at any time during the menstrual cycle. Treatment with IVM is an alternative method when chemotherapy cannot be delayed or ovarian stimulation is contraindicated. The long-term outcomes remain to be studied.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; fertility preservation; in vitro maturation; luteal phase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27810160     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  14 in total

1.  Thirteen years' experience in fertility preservation for cancer patients after in vitro fertilization and in vitro maturation treatments.

Authors:  Helene Creux; Patricia Monnier; Weon-Young Son; William Buckett
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Assessing the practice of LuPOR for poor responders: a prospective study evaluating follicular fluid cfDNA levels during natural IVF cycles.

Authors:  Sfakianoudis Konstantinos; Tsioulou Petroula; Maziotis Evangelos; Giannelou Polina; Glava Argyro; Grigoriadis Sokratis; Rapani Anna; Nezos Andrianos; Pantou Agni; Koutsilieris Michael; Pantos Konstantinos; Mastorakos George; Simopoulou Mara
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Outcomes of ovarian stimulation and fertility preservation in breast cancer patients with different hormonal receptor profiles.

Authors:  Jacques Balayla; Togas Tulandi; William Buckett; Hananel Holzer; Naama Steiner; Guy Shrem; Alexander Volodarsky-Perel
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  What is the true place of a double stimulation and double oocyte retrieval in the same cycle for patients diagnosed with poor ovarian reserve? A systematic review including a meta-analytical approach.

Authors:  Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Konstantinos Pantos; Sokratis Grigoriadis; Anna Rapani; Evangelos Maziotis; Petroula Tsioulou; Polina Giannelou; Adamantia Kontogeorgi; Agni Pantou; Nikolaos Vlahos; Michael Koutsilieris; Mara Simopoulou
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Decreased pregnancy and live birth rates after vitrification of in vitro matured oocytes.

Authors:  Yoni Cohen; Alexandra St-Onge-St-Hilaire; Samer Tannus; Grace Younes; Michael H Dahan; William Buckett; Weon-Young Son
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  What Are the Live Birth and Multiple Pregnancy Rates When 1 Versus 2 Low-Quality Blastocysts Are Transferred in a Cryopreserved Cycle? a Retrospective Cohort Study, Stratified for Age, Embryo Quality, and Oocyte Donor Cycles.

Authors:  Suha Arab; Ahmad Badegiesh; Sarah Aldhaheri; Weon-Young Son; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 7.  In vitro maturation of human immature oocytes for fertility preservation and research material.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Shirasawa; Yukihiro Terada
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2017-06-18

8.  Fertility Preservation in Female Patients with Breast Cancer - a Current Overview.

Authors:  Veronika Guenther; Ibrahim Alkatout; Wiebe Junkers; Dirk Bauerschlag; Nicolai Maass; Soeren von Otte
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Vitrification has detrimental effects on maturation, viability, and subcellular quality of oocytes post IVM in cancerous women: An experimental study.

Authors:  Mehdi Mohsenzadeh; Nasim Tabibnejad; Mahboubeh Vatanparast; Fatemeh Anbari; Mohammad Ali Khalili; Mojgan Karimi-Zarchi
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2019-05-05

Review 10.  The Improvement and Clinical Application of Human Oocyte In Vitro Maturation (IVM).

Authors:  Xueqi Gong; Hemei Li; Yiqing Zhao
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.